BeecherVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2008
- Messages
- 39,116
- Likes
- 14,439
That's what happens when you blow the SEC East and a Sugar Bowl bid by losing to Will Muschamp and Derek Mason.
Saban tier:
Nick Saban
Elite tier (the rest of the active coaches with NCs):
Urban Meyer
Jimbo Fisher
Dabo Swinney
Bob Stoops (although he's probably closer to "Very Good," I'm including him because having a NC is so rare among active coaches now)
Very good tier:
David Shaw
Jim Harbaugh
Gary Patterson
Chris Petersen
Bobby Petrino
Good tier:
About 30 coaches who are basically interchangeable, including Butch Jones
A year ago, I would've said no way....thought he was definitely one of the top 20 or 25 coaches in college ball.
Then Vandy and South Carolina happened. Heaping those on top of a few questionable in-game decisions that came before, and a bit of public relations foot-in-mouth disease, and now...just not sure.
This season should tell the tale, one way or the other.
Just curious, which wins put Harbaugh in "very good" in your opinion?
agreed. he's not bottom 10-12. he's not top 10-12.
judged more harshly for the losses to USCe and Vandy, then praised for the wins over VT, FL and UGA.
it's off season fodder. do with it what you will.
he's an average coach in an average division. put him in the high 30's/low 40's and call it a day.
He went 11-1 in back to back seasons at San Diego. He then took Stanford from absolutely nothing to 11-1 in his final season. He won as a 40 point dog against USC in 2007 (his first season at Stanford). He took the 49ers, who were a dumpster fire, took them to the Super Bowl, and they went back to the dumpster fire. He took over at Michigan, which had its second worse 2 year stretch in its history and led them to Top 10 rankings.
I don't like the antics but the results are there
When was Clawson ever our head coach? Just for good measure, the hypothetical answer is no, since his hiring/massive failure went a long way toward ending Fulmer's career. Either way, it's a weird question that has nothing to do with how good/bad a head coach Jones is.
Yeah. There are several guys ahead of him that don't deserve to be. I didn't see anyone in the short list below him that's better than him.
http://www.cbssports.com/college-fo...ach-rankings-power-five-coaches-ranked-65-26/
52 Volunteers
Butch Jones (33 2016 ranking): A Champion of Life, but not a champion of our rankings. Still, in my opinion, this is a pretty steep drop considering all the injuries Tennessee dealt with last year. Raised expectations will do that, though.
I'm not the biggest Butch cheerleader but it's crazy that he's behind a guy such as Ed Orgeron.
Let me know if you think this ranking is too high, too low, or just right. Without seeing the Top 25, I'd have Butch in the 25-35 range for Power 5 coaches.
When a Big 10 guy does the list, you get results like this..
Butch Jones is 3-0 against the Big 10 West while at UT yet he is ranked behind every Big 10 West coach on the list except for Lovie Smith. He is way behind 3 guys that got blown the F out by UT.
I would say about 40-50 range, and bottom 2 or 3 in the SEC. I love Tennessee football, but I'm definitely not a fan of Lyle.
edit: and I want to add that he would be very high on the list of over-paid coaches in college football based on his pathetic record against top 25 opponents at 4.11 mil.
Saban tier:
Nick Saban
Elite tier (the rest of the active coaches with NCs):
Urban Meyer
Jimbo Fisher
Dabo Swinney
Bob Stoops (although he's probably closer to "Very Good," I'm including him because having a NC is so rare among active coaches now)
Very good tier:
David Shaw
Jim Harbaugh
Gary Patterson
Chris Petersen
Bobby Petrino
Good tier:
About 30 coaches who are basically interchangeable, including Butch Jones
There are 65 Power 5 schools. There are ONLY 12 that have won 9+ games the last two years (Clemson, FSU, Utah, UF, Tennessee, Ohio St, Michigan, WI, Bama, Oklahoma, Ok State, Stanford). I'm not saying this stat should completely overshadow the Game/Program/PR management issues that have been well documented but it should prove that 52 is too low.
The bad losses trump the good wins imo because the bad losses ultimately defined the outcome of the season. Then throw in the high/fair expectations that he fell short of and there you go, the more harsh ranking rather than the forgiving one.