Post Your Voter Fraud Evidence Here

#3,901
#3,901
BowlBrother85 said:
^^^^ What Trump said several months BEFORE the 2016 and 2020 Presidential Elections had even been held. ^^^^

To a person of even average intelligence, that would indicate that Trump was just making a pre-emptive excuse in case he lost. To the Cult of Trump, however, they not only have to believe it .... they have to aggressively support and defend it.
Click to expand...
He said the Iowa Caucus was rigged in 2016…nothing is fair unless he wins
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
#3,902
#3,902
when Hillary lost, 2016 election was corrupt and unfair according to the Dems. Gore tried to overturn election in FLA in 2000. Seems when Dems lose only they can question the fairness of elections but Trump cannot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#3,903
#3,903
jmacvols1 said:
when Hillary lost, 2016 election was corrupt and unfair according to the Dems. Gore tried to overturn election in FLA in 2000. Seems when Dems lose only they can question the fairness of elections but Trump cannot.
Click to expand...

I think 2000 deserved a legitimate debate and recount given the tiny margin and circumstances in FL.

In 2016 and 2020, it's just sore losers....
 
  • Like
Reactions: GordonC and BowlBrother85
#3,904
#3,904
jmacvols1 said:
when Hillary lost, 2016 election was corrupt and unfair according to the Dems. Gore tried to overturn election in FLA in 2000. Seems when Dems lose only they can question the fairness of elections but Trump cannot.
Click to expand...
Hillary Clinton was also a sore loser in 2016. She had sour grapes. No doubt about it.

However, between the "fake elector scheme" and the riot at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, it should be evident that Trump and his followers did far more than just claim that the election was unfair. They took active measures, and even resorted to violence, in order to overturn the outcome.

Finally, you are leaving out an important detail about Al Gore .... Even though he lost the 2000 Presidential Election by less than 600 votes from one state (where his opponent's brother happened to be the Governor), Al Gore not only never said that the election was rigged ... as the sitting Vice President, Gore also presided over the formal certification of his own defeat by calling the electoral votes into roll.

I can't imagine the frogs that would have rained down from Republicans in Congress if Gore had tried to contend that he had the Constitutional authority to not count the electoral votes from the state of Florida - as Trump tried to pressure Pence into doing in Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania.
 
#3,905
#3,905
BigOrangeMojo said:
I think 2000 deserved a legitimate debate and recount given the tiny margin and circumstances in FL.

In 2016 and 2020, it's just sore losers....
Click to expand...
Indeed .... 2000 was truly a close election. Eventually, Gore did the right thing, however. He conceded defeat and presided over the formal certification of his defeat without incident.
 
#3,906
#3,906
jmacvols1 said:
when Hillary lost, 2016 election was corrupt and unfair according to the Dems. Gore tried to overturn election in FLA in 2000. Seems when Dems lose only they can question the fairness of elections but Trump cannot.
Click to expand...


Your post is absurd. Did Hillary act in '16 like the gangster did in '20? Did she run around the country blatantly lying for weeks? Start an insurrection? Help organize a slate of false state electors? Did she call a top state election official and try to bully him into committing felony vote fraud? Incite an attack on the Capitol that got people killed? Get real, Earl. You don't know what you're talking about.

Gore didn't try to overturn the election in 2000. That is a stupid lie. In fact, Gore was completely screwed by the Supreme Court when it wouldn't allow a recount in Florida, which was the source of all the controversy because of its "hanging chads."

The problem with rubes is that that they throw out nonsense to justify their political views---and are ok looking stupid in doing so.
 
#3,907
#3,907

Far-right group Project Veritas admits it had ‘no evidence’ of voter fraud in Pennsylvania​

Political agitator James O’Keefe and organization he once led had spread false claims of fraud at post office during 2020 election
 
#3,909
#3,909
Orangeburst said:

Hillary Clinton calls Donald Trump an ‘illegitimate president’​


I mean I could go on and on..
Click to expand...


Feel free...You won't get within light years of what the gangster did....as we all know.

Also, I believe, correct me if I'm wrong, that this Clinton comment was in reference to the Russian social-media bots that were a definite
factor in the campaign, not vote fraud.
 
#3,910
#3,910
turbovol said:
Your post is absurd. Did Hillary act in '16 like the gangster did in '20? Did she run around the country blatantly lying for weeks? Start an insurrection? Help organize a slate of false state electors? Did she call a top state election official and try to bully him into committing felony vote fraud? Incite an attack on the Capitol that got people killed? Get real, Earl. You don't know what you're talking about.

Gore didn't try to overturn the election in 2000. That is a stupid lie. In fact, Gore was completely screwed by the Supreme Court when it wouldn't allow a recount in Florida, which was the source of all the controversy because of its "hanging chads."

The problem with rubes is that that they throw out nonsense to justify their political views---and are ok looking stupid in doing so.
Click to expand...
Hillary CLinton did lie as she always does (Russian dossier) and Trump was proving there were irregularities in the 2020 election. According to Dems 2016 election was the most corrupt and 2020 was the most secure with the only changes being made from 2016 to 2020 were laws being illegally overturned by corrupt judges for the 2020 election ... drop boxes and mail in voting, etc.

oh, so Gored was "completely screwed" by a court for not having a recount in FLA but it was perfectly ok not to have recounts, audits, signature matching verifications, computer forensic, etc for Trump in states where irregularities were proven to exist.
 
#3,911
#3,911
BowlBrother85 said:
Hillary Clinton was also a sore loser in 2016. She had sour grapes. No doubt about it.

However, between the "fake elector scheme" and the riot at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, it should be evident that Trump and his followers did far more than just claim that the election was unfair. They took active measures, and even resorted to violence, in order to overturn the outcome.

Finally, you are leaving out an important detail about Al Gore .... Even though he lost the 2000 Presidential Election by less than 600 votes from one state (where his opponent's brother happened to be the Governor), Al Gore not only never said that the election was rigged ... as the sitting Vice President, Gore also presided over the formal certification of his own defeat by calling the electoral votes into roll.

I can't imagine the frogs that would have rained down from Republicans in Congress if Gore had tried to contend that he had the Constitutional authority to not count the electoral votes from the state of Florida - as Trump tried to pressure Pence into doing in Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania.
Click to expand...
Irregularites were proven to take place in the 2020 election and there was a right for people to protest a stolen election. There would have probably been no violence at the Capitol had the police not first agitated the peaceful crowd by firing tire gas and other things at the crowd to purposely stir up the crowd then open the doors to the Capitoal so the crowd could get inside. Of course there was plan b with the pipe bombs had plan a not worked in stirring the crowd up into something of a riot. And there were feds and antifa mixed in the crowd stirring the crowd up and antifa causing damage. Trump had NOTHING to do with this, he did tweet that people protest preacfully but that was erased from twitter. He even recomended the national guard be there and the mayor of DC agreed till she had ameeting woth pelosi then she changed her mind and did not want the guard to be a the capitol.

nypost.com

Two known Antifa members posed as pro-Trump to infiltrate Capitol riot: sources

At least two known Antifa members were spotted among the throngs of pro-Trump protesters at the Capitol on Wednesday, a law enforcement source told The Post. The Antifa members disguised themselves…
nypost.com nypost.com

It's ok for Gore to challenge an election but a crime if Trump does. Pence had a right NOT to certify the votes, that would be within the laws ofor him not to do so. There was election irregularties that took place and no state should have certified votes until thorough audits were done.
 
#3,912
#3,912
BigOrangeMojo said:
I think 2000 deserved a legitimate debate and recount given the tiny margin and circumstances in FL.

In 2016 and 2020, it's just sore losers....
Click to expand...
If there can be audits and recounts for Gore, there should equally be audits and recounts for Trump for irregularities were proven to exist in various states in 2020.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
#3,913
#3,913
jmacvols1 said:
If there can be audits and recounts for Gore, there should equally be audits and recounts for Trump for irregularities were proven to exist in various states in 2020.
Click to expand...

They did all that and Trump still lost. Bush in NM (2000) and Gore in FL (2000) lost by .0009%. Trump lost Michigan by 3%.

These aren't in the same universe statistically.
 
#3,915
#3,915
jmacvols1 said:
There was really nothing done in WIS, MI, PA, GA where problems were found.
Click to expand...

Any issues conclusively found were nowhere near within margin of victory.

These political parties have data scientists that drill down to the precinct level with tons of demographic information. They know immediately if something is off...
 
#3,916
#3,916
Trump lost because he underperformed in suburban districts (he did this nationwide) and because urban areas had greater turnout. The D/R split in urban voters didn't change, just more urban voters voted...
 
#3,917
#3,917
BigOrangeMojo said:
Any issues conclusively found were nowhere near within margin of victory.

These political parties have data scientists that drill down to the precinct level with tons of demographic information. They know immediately if something is off...
Click to expand...
There were no audits done, no forensic computer audits done in these states to prove all votes cast were legitimate.

Just a couple of weeks ago, a professor using a pen went into a voting machine in GA, bypassed passwords and made changes where audits could not even detect those changes.
 
#3,918
#3,918
BigOrangeMojo said:
Trump lost because he underperformed in suburban districts (he did this nationwide) and because urban areas had greater turnout. The D/R split in urban voters didn't change, just more urban voters voted...
Click to expand...
Trump supposedly lost for Biden got 81 millions votes and it has never been proven all those votes were legit.
 
#3,919
#3,919
jmacvols1 said:
There were no audits done, no forensic computer audits done in this states to porve all votes cast were legitimate.

Just a couple of weeks ago, a professor using a pen went into a voting machine in GA, bypassed passwords and made changes where audits could not even detect those changes.
Click to expand...

Trump lost. Nothing substantiated has proven anything different. He lost because typical R leaning suburban voters abandoned him....
 
#3,922
#3,922
If Trump did as well as Perdue in GA, he wins GA

If Trump did as well as lower quartile R in Maricopa AZ, he wins AZ.

The issues wasn't the election, the issue was with Trump...
 
#3,924
#3,924
Since Trump lost GA by changes in mostly red suburban districts, let me get this straight

A R led county commissioner appointed a R election official in a R led state. The R Secretary of State certifies the election. The R's part own data analysts do not spot any irregularities. All of the other Rs running in general election at same time outperform the guy who is claiming he was cheated.

So, did all these Rs decide to conspire against Trump or did the suburban trend that literally showed up nationwide for Trump also show up in GA?
 
#3,925
#3,925
BigOrangeMojo said:
Since Trump lost GA by changes in mostly red suburban districts, let me get this straight

A R led county commissioner appointed a R election official in a R led state. The R Secretary of State certifies the election. The R's part own data analysts do not spot any irregularities. All of the other Rs running in general election at same time outperform the guy who is claiming he was cheated.

So, did all these Rs decide to conspire against Trump or did the suburban trend that literally showed up nationwide for Trump also show up in GA?
Click to expand...
Uniparty at the national level. They don’t see R and D like you do. If you can’t see the Uniparty then you are in it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top