Zimmerman Trial

[rockytop9808]

If GZ is convicted of anything no one in FL will ever be safe from prosecution while defending their selves.

No one will be safe from anything. The state has clearly shown they are willing to employ people who come into cases with horrible biases. They've given a giant "f*** you" to burden of proof and innocence until proven guilty.

 

[hog88]

No one will be safe from anything. The state has clearly shown they are willing to employ people who come into cases with horrible biases. They've given a giant "f*** you" to burden of proof and innocence until proven guilty.

It does make the state look bad. It would be a travesty for the jury to come back with a guilty verdict.

 

[UTVOLKeith]

please stop this stupid bickering so we can get this thread back on track.

OK well I definitely think child applies

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Zebras eat snickers.

Don't violate my liberty while i roof my house

:lolabove:

 

[rockytop9808]

OK well I definitely think child applies

Then you're an idiot who hasn't followed anything.

 

[rockytop9808]

It does make the state look bad. It would be a travesty for the jury to come back with a guilty verdict.

The judge is trying to push the jury towards a verdict. It's insane.

 

[hog88]

The judge is trying to push the jury towards a verdict. It's insane.

I can't see any guilty verdict standing an appeal but even so that would mean GZ would be in prison for years before any appeal is heard.

 

[YorkVol]

OK well I definitely think child applies

so you agree with adding the 3rd degree murder based on felony child abuse charge being added at the last minute?

 

[BearCat204]

OK well I definitely think child applies

Shocking...............you've been completely clueless on everything else, why change now

 

[rockytop9808]

I can't see any guilty verdict standing an appeal but even so that would mean GZ would be in prison for years before any appeal is heard.

Which is why as soon as this trial is over this judge should be incarcerated.

 

[UTVOLKeith]

It does make the state look bad.

You have to be kidding.

The state should never have brought charges when they knew their witnesses were liars.

Worse is the state should be held with treason for coaching them to lie...especially bao
.
I hate that *****

 

[rockytop9808]

You have to be kidding.

The state should never have brought charges when they knew their witnesses were liars.

Worse is the state should be held with treason for coaching them to lie...especially bao
.
I hate that *****

What?

 

[Obsessed]

:lolabove:

Speaking in code to Keith.

 

[UTVOLKeith]

What?

Bao

The medical examiner

The expert

That never treated Zimmerman nor autopised Martin.

 

[rockytop9808]

Bao

The medical examiner

The expert

That never treated Zimmerman nor autopised Martin.

...

 

[PKT_VOL]

3rd degree has no bearing in the case and it springed on the defense last moment despite it being well written with case precedents in the prosecution's jury instructions. In other words, they intentionally surprised the defense about this last second.

 

[PKT_VOL]

The prosecution should not be allowed to have overlapping options. They tried this as a second degree murder case. Everything which incorporates second degree murder should be off the table; 3rd degree, manslaughter, aggravated assault, etc should be thrown out. It is BS to try one thing and let the jury convict on another.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Speaking in code to Keith.

yes indeed. :loco: I thought you were. classic!!

 

[rockytop9808]

The prosecution should not be allowed to have overlapping options. They tried this as a second degree murder case. Everything which incorporates second degree murder should be off the table; 3rd degree, manslaughter, aggravated assault, etc should be thrown out. It is BS to try one thing and let the jury convict on another.

It's a deliberate abuse of a person's rights is what it is.

 

[VOLinthaNATI]

The prosecution should not be allowed to have overlapping options. They tried this as a second degree murder case. Everything which incorporates second degree murder should be off the table; 3rd degree, manslaughter, aggravated assault, etc should be thrown out. It is BS to try one thing and let the jury convict on another.

State is now trying to save face and obviously the Judge is doing the same. It's unfortunate but the Judge knows she'd be destroyed/threatened unmercifully if she only let the 2nd Murder charge be the single charge allowed.

 

[BearCat204]

The prosecution should not be allowed to have overlapping options. They tried this as a second degree murder case. Everything which incorporates second degree murder should be off the table; 3rd degree, manslaughter, aggravated assault, etc should be thrown out. It is BS to try one thing and let the jury convict on another.

Not only is it BS, its unconstitutional and should be criminal

 

[Obsessed]

It's a deliberate abuse of a person's rights is what it is.

So they are allowed to throw it all against the wall and see what sticks?

 

[PKT_VOL]

So they are allowed to throw it all against the wall and see what sticks?

Yep.

 

[YorkVol]

is it common for jury instructions to be written this way?

 

[rockytop9808]

So they are allowed to throw it all against the wall and see what sticks?

Apparently.

I'm infuriated. Now I understand why this case is important- it's gone from a regular murder trial to a statement on the rampant abuses of our government and its corrupt cronies.