Zimmerman Trial

#526
#526
notabed22 said:
That's what I said, isn't it?
Click to expand...

So, if you were on this jury, and the judge gave her pre-deliberation instructions that any reasonable doubt should result in acquital, you would ignore those instructions?

You would sentence a man to what would likely be the bulk of his natural life in prison even though you did not believe that the case against him was sufficiently proven?

That's really scary.
 
#527
#527
notabed22 said:
Follow works too; doesn't remotely change the fact that Zimmerman chased Trayvon.



You seem to forget that my willingness to help you in any situation would be influenced negatively by your ownership of a firearm.
Click to expand...

I don't own any firearms.
 
#528
#528
RollinVol said:
I really think notabed has to be trolling hard just to see the answers he/it gets
Click to expand...

I get it. Sometimes, when people post things with which I do not agree, I feel like I'm being trolled too. When you consider how many people disagree with me, you can understand how these feelings almost become overwhelming.

Then, as it turns out, I remember that people with different opinions aren't actually "trolls." Probably because I understand how the internet works or something... who knows.
 
#529
#529
I've found some of notabed22's movie reviews..

Forrest Gump: Some mentally handicapped guy fathers a normal kid.

The Godfather: Some old dude dies.

Schindlers List: It's black and white with some red coat.

Star Wars: They're in space

The Wizard of OZ: Something about a road.

The Usual Suspects: Kevin Spacey walks normal at the end, wtf?

Gone with the Wind: Dude keeps playing a piano.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#532
#532
bamawriter said:
So, if you were on this jury, and the judge gave her pre-deliberation instructions that any reasonable doubt should result in acquital, you would ignore those instructions?

You would sentence a man to what would likely be the bulk of his natural life in prison even though you did not believe that the case against him was sufficiently proven?

That's really scary.
Click to expand...

Yes, I would.

YorkVol said:
I don't own any firearms.
Click to expand...

Then there's a chance I'd be willing to help you out!

Also, though, still a high chance I wouldn't. I'm pretty self-centered and I'd likely find some reason to dislike you. Heck, I might find many reasons and/or motivations to not assist you or anyone else in a time of need unless I stood to gain something from it.

So, yea, I agree with your choice not to waste the phone call on me. Smart decision.
 
#534
#534
Why does everyone act as if this is the first thread that he has shown his junior league level trolling skills? LG is a true troll......he can actually present enough of a case to get you to follow for at least a page or so. Not is like Barry, Barry opens his mouth, it is BS, Not pushes a key on the keyboard, it is BS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#535
#535
notabed22 said:
Follow works too; doesn't remotely change the fact that Zimmerman chased Trayvon.
Click to expand...

You used chase as in "chased down". There is no evidence to support that definition of chase and it is distinct from the concept of following.

As a larger point, your characterization that GZ chased down and shot TM is simply not supported by any of the evidence presented so far and is in fact contradicted. Attempting to find an interpretation of the word chase doesn't change the accuracy of your characterization.
 
#536
#536
notabed22 said:
Yes, I would.
Click to expand...

so you don't believe in the US judicial system at all? I can't understand how you could be so scared in your life that you would put someone away that is likely innocent of the charges.
 
#537
#537
There are no words for the level of stupid this guy is. So close minded. Obviously something against people with guns. Therefore I can only hope that he will be in a event where he wished he had one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#538
#538
volinbham said:
You used chase as in "chased down". There is no evidence to support that definition of chase and it is distinct from the concept of following.

As a larger point, your characterization that GZ chased down and shot TM is simply not supported by any of the evidence presented so far and is in fact contradicted. Attempting to find an interpretation of the word chase doesn't change the accuracy of your characterization.
Click to expand...

Even if one were to accept the notion that "chase" and "follow" are interchangable terms, the bigger issue is the fact that he's competely omitting what happened between Zimmerman chasing/following Martin and Zimmerman shooting martin.

Twist the English language however you want, but to say that Zimmerman "chased Martin down and shot him" is a falsehood by way of omission.
 
Last edited:
#539
#539
volinbham said:
You used chase as in "chased down". There is no evidence to support that definition of chase and it is distinct from the concept of following.

As a larger point, your characterization that GZ chased down and shot TM is simply not supported by any of the evidence presented so far and is in fact contradicted. Attempting to find an interpretation of the word chase doesn't change the accuracy of your characterization.
Click to expand...

This.

There's no stopping anybody from believing anything. It's much more likely he's trolling. One would have to be utterly ignorant of the evidence to be actually taking his stance and I don't thing that's the case.
 
#540
#540
82_VOL_83 said:
Why does everyone act as if this is the first thread that he has shown his junior league level trolling skills? LG is a true troll......he can actually present enough of a case to get you to follow for at least a page or so. Not is like Barry, Barry opens his mouth, it is BS, Not pushes a key on the keyboard, it is BS.
Click to expand...

Again, I'm sorry that the middle school debate team on which you undoubtedly struggled didn't prepare you for the reality that not everyone shares your opinions.

Also, for the record, you need to stay at least somewhat consistent. Don't try to make jokes regarding my gender and then refer to me properly as a "he;" it doesn't make any sense. Granted, the jokes aren't very good to begin with, but it would at least help your cause.

volinbham said:
You used chase as in "chased down". There is no evidence to support that definition of chase and it is distinct from the concept of following.

As a larger point, your characterization that GZ chased down and shot TM is simply not supported by any of the evidence presented so far and is in fact contradicted. Attempting to find an interpretation of the word chase doesn't change the accuracy of your characterization.
Click to expand...

I'm curious as to where your evidence that Trayvon chased down and shot Zimmerman is sourced. Oh, wait, the opposite happened.

utvolpj said:
so you don't believe in the US judicial system at all? I can't understand how you could be so scared in your life that you would put someone away that is likely innocent of the charges.
Click to expand...

He's not "likely" innocent; the evidence as presented thus far doesn't indicate his guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, though.
 
#542
#542
notabed22 said:
Yes, I would.



Then there's a chance I'd be willing to help you out!

Also, though, still a high chance I wouldn't. I'm pretty self-centered and I'd likely find some reason to dislike you. Heck, I might find many reasons and/or motivations to not assist you or anyone else in a time of need unless I stood to gain something from it.

So, yea, I agree with your choice not to waste the phone call on me. Smart decision.
Click to expand...

And, not to forget to add the fact you don't own a gun and, I would assume, would be incapable of defending me in any other way...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#543
#543
notabed22 said:
He's not "likely" innocent; the evidence as presented thus far doesn't indicate his guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, though.
Click to expand...

yet you would still convict. Are you against the US judicial system or would you simply lie about his guilt?
 
#544
#544
notabed22 said:
I'm curious as to where your evidence that Trayvon chased down and shot Zimmerman is sourced. Oh, wait, the opposite happened.
Click to expand...

I don't believe anyone, let alone bham, has suggested that "Martin chased down and shot Zimmerman."


He's not "likely" innocent; the evidence as presented thus far doesn't indicate his guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, though.
Click to expand...

Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is supposed to be the standard in criminal trials. Why would you choose to convict Zimmerman despite your admitted reasonable doubt?
 
#548
#548
volfanngaytorland said:
I'm sure there are. I always get out so I haven't had the joy of witnessing that just yet :)
Click to expand...

because of a technicality I didn't get picked but I sat in through the process 3 times. Some of these people would make even notabed look intelligent
 
#550
#550
notabed22 said:
Again, I'm sorry that the middle school debate team on which you undoubtedly struggled didn't prepare you for the reality that not everyone shares your opinions.

Also, for the record, you need to stay at least somewhat consistent. Don't try to make jokes regarding my gender and then refer to me properly as a "he;" it doesn't make any sense. Granted, the jokes aren't very good to begin with, but it would at least help your cause.
Click to expand...

:eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol:

Nice attempt at sophomoric ridicule. Obviously above me because it had no effect what so ever.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top