After introducing items which the police had booked into evidence, the prosecution called a witness who helped its case. She testified that she heard running "from left to right" outside her apartment before the shooting. That would place Zimmerman and Martin further inside the two rows of buildings than the scene of the shooting, indicating that Zimmerman had pursued Martin farther than expected. When asked about what she had heard, she just popped out with the bombshell testimony, which was not included in any of her written statements. She got wide-eyed with a scared look on her face, so I thought she was very aware of what she had just done. Her testimony was a little conflicted. She claimed to the defense that she did not remember if she had made that disclosure in her previous statements; she even looked through her written statements to see if she had said anything about which direction they were going, but when the prosecutor told her that they had never asked her about the direction, she immediately agreed with him. The defense should have objected, because the prosecutor was leading, putting words in her mouth. The testimony raised the question of prosecutor misconduct, and to me that is what it looked like, but the defense was not able to do much besides make the situation look very strange, as it was.