esarmstrong
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2011
- Messages
- 4,519
- Likes
- 5,065
There is too much talent on that team especially on the offensive side of the ball to be sitting at 3-5. You'd think they would luck up and win one against Fla, UGA, Miss St or USCjr. But, no.
There is too much talent on that team especially on the offensive side of the ball to be sitting at 3-5. You'd think they would luck up and win one against Fla, UGA, Miss St or USCjr. But, no.
Sucks, but we've been within a possession in all of those games except Florida, which looked good with 15 minutes left ... i know, "moral victories" but we lost to Kentucky last year for goodness sakes ... expectations should be quelled for the D to make a scheme change
D is right there too ... replace Moore with Coleman and we win 2 of those 4 at least
Flame on, Go Vols
I blame that one a the OC and HC for that, poor playcalling. How many times have we seen 3rd and short and we run chuck it deep?? Not to mention the overall philosophy, Chaney is a pass-happy coordinator, period. He always has been and he has to force himself to stick with the run game. That's why we let Florida get away. But what do i know...
I was with you until the "D is right there too". The D sucks. There is no excuse for that abortion of a defense out there right now. It's embarrassing. If Wilcox were still here, I'd say that they're sitting at 6-2 instead of 3-5.
Progress has been made, but they're still losing. Next year will not be better if Dooley is kept with a tougher schedule and losing a lot of talent off the offensive side of the ball.
Agree that without the scheme change, we're 7-1 or 6-2 ... just posted that in another thread ... would you disagree that we're 1 or 2 players away, in the secondary specifically, from having a much improved record?
IF we get Gruden, I'm all for it, but we still have to play Bama, Oregon, and the Gators all away next year ... no matter who the coach is, that's a tough break
Agree that without the scheme change, we're 7-1 or 6-2 ... just posted that in another thread ... would you disagree that we're 1 or 2 players away, in the secondary specifically, from having a much improved record?
IF we get Gruden, I'm all for it, but we still have to play Bama, Oregon, and the Gators all away next year ... no matter who the coach is, that's a tough break
I think if Wilcox was still here, we'd be 6-2, 5-3 at worst. He was smart enough to be able to hide his weaknesses at times. We are slow at LB and specifically at the safety spot in covering the pass. Our safeties are getting flat out torched. Our Lb's can't cover the slant for anything. We miss Randolph and Lanier, but I think this team won't see much of an improvement next year in their record and they'll be playing a tougher schedule. There are 3 losses pretty much already built in no matter who is coach.
Further verifcation of the fact that he is making a strong case for being a draft pick some day. Since the Georgia game he has been our most consistent reciever and today he was our brightest spot on an otherwise not-so-good day for UT.
Discuss, if you please: