Yeah....I know many here will disagree but the Tim Banks thing was something I didn't agree with. Most of the complaints I heard were from people who generally seem to have sustained and engrained grass is greener idiocy syndrome. I think Tim Banks was fantastic. He's a great teaching coach and players do and will get better under him. He understands how to develope players, he just made players better. But cause the armchairs are all about schemes here we are. I think I'd be more upset if it wasn't Jim Knowles. Clearly he's proven. BUT I think you have to have the talant and IQ already there and recruited when you start complex schemes, I hope we have the defensive players ready for it, and chances are there will be a learning curve. Some might miss Tim first season. Jim will have to either simplify a bit until his players skill up, or if they startout where he left out some players may get lost. (i.e. Are our players ready for Buckeye's top level complexity) I hope I am wrong, and others know better. Tim banks is going to end up a big time D coach somewhere. He is part of the reason i just stopped following the news as it was all just pissing me off. I was for keeping him based on the players we had. If Jim is able to immediately take our current talant and and start playing chess though I will be happily wrong. Dunno about the rest.