ThreatLevelVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2011
- Messages
- 1,400
- Likes
- 909
Do we really think that keeping a coach who has been fired effective at the end of the year is putting all his time into game planning for the next game? There is a reason that firings are effective immediately due to usual quality of work after termination.
And how do you know this? Are you implying the team isn't going to play for Butch but would ball for one of the assistants? I've not seen "quit" from this team. They simply aren't very good, but I'm not seeing a lack of effort.
In your opinion, why is it imperative that we fire Butch immediately (during the season) as opposed to the end of the year? In other words, what does Tennessee gain in that scenario?
Let's just say I'm curious for research purposes.
Discuss.
Freak, what about my assertion that everyone in the AD is slightly more intelligent than a half eaten ham sandwich? I will hang up and listen.
So you think letting Jones coach a few more games rather than an assistant, that's accepting failure?The acceptance of failure is more embarrassing than the failure itself.
See the posts above. I don't believe Jones finishing the season limits Tennessee from reaching out and discussing the job with other candidates or their representatives.You cannot hire for a position that is not vacant.
For one, it gives recruits a definitive yes no answer on if we are keeping Butch. It also allows other recruits Butch didnt pursue to rethink Tennessee once new coach has been named.
Frankly, it matters because with Butch we arent getting to 6-6. With an interim we will.
You don't think Tennessee is working on a replacement already? What limitations do we have, whether he's still here or not?
You think recruiting improves with a vacant head coaching position?
Okay, I'll bite. How does firing Butch now affect the early signing period? Are you saying that recruits who committed to THIS STAFF, are more likely to sign during the early period if THIS STAFF is fired? Pleas explain.
You cannot hire for a position that is not vacant.
Fair enough. But assuming they are serious.....
I'm pretty sure recruits are already in a wait and see status or they'd be gone already.
This.
Good answer. Maybe the best I've read.
Exactly.
Why can't the plan be to let him finish the season and fire him? Hence the thread: what do we gain from firing him now?
It's really just the early signing period. Allow our current commits to get used to our next head coach so we don't lose out entirely on the December signing period.
In your opinion, why is it imperative that we fire Butch immediately (during the season) as opposed to the end of the year? In other words, what does Tennessee gain in that scenario?
Let's just say I'm curious for research purposes.
Discuss.
agreed. At this point, we're 30 days from the end of the season. People will lose their minds, but I don't see that it matters that much as long as they're working on the replacement and are ready to name him quickly.Effort isn't the problem. The team is still playing hard; they just aren't good. An interim isn't going to be able to change that.
I want Butch fired tonight as much as the next guy, but I will cheerfully admit that that's an emotional opinion based mostly on me wanting him out of my life as quickly as possible. Currie has a lot more things to think about. He was here in 2008 when we fired a coach in-season and lost to Wyoming later in the week.