- Joined
- Feb 2, 2005
- Messages
- 95,192
- Likes
- 68,113
The point is it should be a minor violation. Your firing you coach for inviting a couple of committed players to a team bbq at the coach's house.
Compare that to Cam Newton's dad trying to shop his son around to the highest bidder.
if it was just about the cookout then Bruce should have owned up to it and he would still be gainfully employed.
I really wish people would stop trying the "but what they did was worse" excuse for Bruce. UT tried to keep him but things just keep popping up that made that impossible
I'm pretty sure it wouldn't have been unless it was a dead period.
wish he would have just asked because I could have gotten him a huge grill to use for cheap