It's fair because its a good record against bad teams. Strong supporters will says it great, his detractors will says its meaningless, those of us in the middle think its a part to be considered.
Yes, if he uses big east talent against SEC talent, he's going to lose most games. That's not the point. He's turned around a program that was going dead, even in the big east.
You give him SEC talent, what could he do? I'd imagine good things.
Yeah, but it would be the same thing for almost any big time coach out of conference. What would Meyer's Utah team had done? What would Chris Petersen have done in the SEC with his team?
You got to look at what translates. Charlie Strong has proven to be an elite DC in the SEC. Charlie Strong has proven to be an elite recruiter in the SEC. Charlie Strong took over a trainwreck and won.
Charlie Strong isn't a very good head coach, and he's a horrible recruiter.
After Dooley gets his walking papers, Tennessee should look elsewhere for its next football coach....Charlie Strong is not the answer. :yes:
This year, he has beat everyone who they asked him to play...what more do you want?
I dont think that Charlie is the best coach out there. However, I do think he might be the best coach who will actually come to Knoxville in 20 days from today.
The guy went 7-6 two years in a row (in the Big Easy) and I get it, he's 9-0 right now. But please, seriously look at the teams Louisville has played this year. Look at who remains on their schedule.
2012 Louisville Cardinals football team - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
CDD would be 9-0 playing that schedule too. Not a single ranked opponent. I'm not saying keep CDD, but I don't get why people think Strong will come here and do any better.
He is on my list also; the list of coaches I don't think can do as well at Tennessee as Dooley has done.