Why all the 5* misses?

Let's look at the math to help us think this through.

First, we can say that--with a rare, rare exception once every several years--all 5* recruits will end up at Power 5 programs.

Next, let's narrow that down a bit. Because there are 69 (was 65, but it grew by four recently) Power 5 universities, including a significant group who have no real chance at a 5* recruit in an average year. I counted 27 of those.* That leaves 42 universities realistically competing for 32 high-octane recruits. So on average, just under one 5* each.

But we know the riches aren't divided evenly. A typical class looks about like this: 4 (or 5) to one school, 3 (or 4) to the next, then 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1.

That's roughly 15 to 20 programs splitting up the 32 lads. Of course, some programs are in the "have" group one year, and the "have not" the next; there's a sort of churn among the 42 universities with a real shot at a top tier recruit.

So conclusion 1: it's nice to usually be in the group that gets at least 1 (and we usually do).

Conclusion 2, our next step forward is to join the Clemson-FSU-USC-LSU tier, by averaging 2 each year. Once we're there, we can leap into the most elite recruiting group of all, those few programs who typically get 3 or 4 each year (these days, just Bama, UGa, and Ohio St).

Go Vols!



* The 27 are: Arizona, Boston College, BYU. Cincinnati, Duke, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa State, Houston, Kansas, Kansas State, Louisville, Maryland, Minnesota, Northwestern, Purdue, Rutgers, Southern Miss, Texas Tech, UCF, Utah, Vanderbilt, Virginia, Wake Forest, and Washington State. Most of these are included because they have never signed a 5* (including, surprisingly, Texas Tech and Wash St). A few have (like Rutgers), but that's clearly one of those quirks that shouldn't be expected to repeat on an average year.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: KTrain
I submit this photo of a 5* misses as my contribution to this thread

RackMultipart.3507.0_original.jpg

This deserves the full image!

1690729995203.png
 
If you listen to CJH in interviews, he talks about recruiting to the culture at UT. While a 5* is an elite athlete physically, his attitude may not fit the culture. Also known as, more trouble than they are worth. I am not saying that is every case but it for sure is in some cases. JMHO Sort of like a girl you met is a 9.5 looks-wise. But, after you get to know her she is a 7 with all things considered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Al Orange
This deserves the full image!

View attachment 566479
I personally never understood the googly attraction.

Her jawline is heavy, her eyes are too far apart, her posture is slouchy, her blonde hair clearly comes from a bottle (the roots tell the tale). I mean, sure, perky boobs, but there are an awful lot of those in the world.

All in all, she's fairly attractive. But if she's a Florida 10, I gotta say, I think a Florida 10 is roughly a Tennessee 7.

Go Vols!
 
I personally never understood the googly attraction.

Her jawline is heavy, her eyes are too far apart, her posture is slouchy, her blonde hair clearly comes from a bottle (the roots tell the tale). I mean, sure, perky boobs, but there are an awful lot of those in the world.

All in all, she's fairly attractive. But if she's a Florida 10, I gotta say, I think a Florida 10 is roughly a Tennessee 7.

Go Vols!
Lane, don't you have a fall camp to prepare for?
 
Here’s a question. We have Butch or Pruitt as coach and land 4 5* players. Heupel lands 4 4* players. Which group of * players get better and play better?
Exactly. And people seem to forget heupel is still building the program. When it becomes clear to everybody that we are here to stay, the big fish will start to jump on board.
 
Here’s a question. We have Butch or Pruitt as coach and land 4 5* players. Heupel lands 4 4* players. Which group of * players get better and play better?

Depends on how accurate the star givers are each and every year. How many 5 stars get replaced by 4 stars in the first two rounds of the draft?

Last year 8 5 stars, 12 4 stars, and 9 3 stars and 3 others taken in first round. Where were the other 24 5 stars?

Could not find 2 nd round summary.

Late bloomers obviously use the college years. 5 stars are still the best bet BUT…..
 
More 5 stars with offers from UGA and Alabama are choosing other schools this year then in the past decade, I'd imagine when this class is all said in done we will be in good standing, NIL and playoff expansion yas only just started to rebalance and distribute talent
Plus beginning in 2024, they don’t have to go to Ga or Alabama to have a shot to make NC playoffs.
 
You have to create an NFL pipeline. Winning helps to get NFL scouts to notice more, buy in the hype of players, etc..
It doesn’t happen over night, but if we start to put more players in the NFL year after year, those 5 star recruits will definitely pay attention.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gog1

Advertisement



Back
Top