SamRebel35
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2009
- Messages
- 15,815
- Likes
- 12,908
On healthcare Trump missed a great opportunity to say that Biden would offer gov't healthcare to people here illegally and how that shows that Joe will not stand up to the far left in his party. I wish he'd done that. Why they haven't hammered Joe more on that issue I have no idea
That's a hit or miss answer. A hit if you are arguing to the base. If addressing the country which includes hordes of libs and undecideds, then you are probably going to fall into the the humanity trap (why we have an obligation to care for all humanity) which can easily make it a miss if you don't get to control the discussion, and a dud even if you do. Just one of those things better left alone when your are dealing with a large segment for whom rational thought is just a sentiment. It's the problem when we elect leaders based on ad campaigns rather than well documented (written) plans of action. However, in doing it this way all candidates have more flexibility after the election, and campaign promises mean nothing.
The other version is Sophisticated Wild A** Guess. But being an engineer I can appreciate the “scientific” slant as well.Better known as a SWAG - scientific wild ass guess. Something along the philosophy of hand grenades and horseshoes but implying so much more.
So in other words they are smart.The other version is Sophisticated Wild A** Guess. But being an engineer I can appreciate the “scientific” slant as well.
Too bad the words “science” and “scientist” have become so politicized and are used so pejoratively e.g. in the public health or climate debates.
Edit: case in point: both of my kids, one who just graduated from Georgetown and the other a junior at Rice, are both still scared sh!tless by all the fearmongering around Covid, and when we try to talk some sense into them they fall back on “ the science”...
So in other words they are smart.
Smart people listen to science.
Many Conservatives are not smart so they hate science.
The undecided voters are the releunctant Trump voters. They don't want Biden at all but Trump keeps turning them off. If they haven't voted yet, last night only helped Trump. It didn't help Biden.
The other version is Sophisticated Wild A** Guess. But being an engineer I can appreciate the “scientific” slant as well.
Too bad the words “science” and “scientist” have become so politicized and are used so pejoratively e.g. in the public health or climate debates.
Edit: case in point: both of my kids, one who just graduated from Georgetown and the other a junior at Rice, are both still scared sh!tless by all the fearmongering around Covid, and when we try to talk some sense into them they fall back on “ the science”...
That is an inconvenient truth.It seems that outside engineering and some things like classical physics that "science" has become nothing more that supposition supported by statistics. And I've said it here many times the statistics are generally fixed by setting boundary conditions. Want to prove the earth is warming - just pick the right start and end points.
It seems that outside engineering and some things like classical physics that "science" has become nothing more that supposition supported by statistics. And I've said it here many times the statistics are generally fixed by setting boundary conditions. Want to prove the earth is warming - just pick the right start and end points.
