The great unknown is whether the Big 12 offenses are really just insanely good, or the Big 12 defenses so awful they make it seem that way.
I don't know the answer.
This is simple... Sam Bradford *Passing Stats* Attempts: 442 - Completed: 302 -- Yards Passing: 4464 -- TD:48 -- Int.:6
Rushing Attempts:40 -- Rushing Yards: 65 -- Rushing TD: 5
Tim Tebow *Passing Stats* Attempts: 268 - Completed: 174 -- Yards Passing: 2515 -- TD:28 -- Int.:2
Rushing Attempts:154 -- Rushing Yards: 564 -- Rushing TD: 12
For me it's a clear choice... Bradford has basically doubled the amount of passing attempts that Tebow has... If Tebow's passing attempts was what Bradford's are he would have even more passing yards and tds that Bradford does. Tebow's ability to rush and score is also another huge factor in my decision. His overall athletic ability is far more superior. He means more to his team than Bradford means to his.
Let me bust your logic for a second.
Your point pretty much seems to be that Tebow has a higher average yards per attempt and higher attempts per TD. You are incorrect.
Completion Percentage
Bradford - 68.3%
Tebow - 64.9%
Yards Per Attempt
Bradford - 10.1
Tebow - 9.4
Attempts per TD
Bradford - 9.21
Tebow - 9.57
QB Rating
Bradford - 186.29
Tebow - 176.74
Rushing Attempts Per TD
Bradford - 8
Tebow - 12.8
While Tebow's stats are nothing to laugh at, in a vaccuum (which is how you based your comparison), Bradford is better in every single meaningful QB category.
In that vacuum, if Tebow had the same number of attempts as Bradford and Bradford rushed as many times as Tebow, Bradford would have 16 more completions, 302 more passing yards, 2 more passing TDs and 7 more rushing TDs.