99gator
Congressman
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2009
- Messages
- 16,557
- Likes
- 20,220
I'm confused. Why is Brown being discussed when he never won a Heisman and finished 5th as said? Majors lost to Hornung and not Brown so the argument is should Majors have won it over Hornung. Majors finished ahead of Brown for whatever reason(s) so Brown is a moot point.
It's not a moot point.
His point is that Majors and Hornung had no business sniffing the Heisman. Jim Brown should have won. We know damn well why Brown didn't win.
And his point is absolutely correct. If one wants to claim Majors was screwed, you need to realize he needs to get in line behind Jim Brown.
Last edited: