R481967
R.I.P. Jazzy
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2008
- Messages
- 1,608
- Likes
- 773
I agree, 100%. What do we have to lose? Our offense is predicated around the run. Even down by 2 scores, there isn't enough confidence to throw the ball down the field. That being the case, I'm sure Stephens can hand off as well as Crompton. Let's see if he can avoid freezing up or staring down receivers when he passes
I don't see too many people on here claiming Stephens is the answer, I see a whole lot of people wanting to see Stephens get the opportunity to see if he may be the answer.
You should try using theOriginally Posted by Wimberlake
Yes. Teague was 10 yards behind the secondary and Crompton overthrew him by 10 yards. High school quarterbacks make that throw regularly....
actually it was a double move and teague splited a tad and the ball was in the air before he came out of his hitch. Crompton did however throw it to flat, needed a bit of air under it.!
Will some of the armchair QB's and receivers answer this question for me? Why is it, with only a few exceptions (pass dropped by BB and pass overthrown to Teague), that for the most part our receivers are never that open? Is it the routes they run, the play calling, the receivers aren't pushing off, or Crompton never finds the open receiver?
Please treat this as a serious question and not another opportunity to blame Crompton, unless you truly believe that is the case. With the exception of a couple of routes, even our completed passes are to receivers who take a hit shortly after making the catch. However, OH was able to produce wide open pass routes against our secondary... and in other collegiate games receivers on other teams are catching passes with the nearest defender 10 yards away. Again, with only a few exceptions, our receivers don't seem to be getting that open.
Dude, you need to reevaluate your priorities and/or get a life. Seeing a college kid walking onto a sport's field REALLY has that much effect on your life?
I take it you're older than 22 or 23? Someone your age should really have a better grasp on what's really important in this life, and should understand that this is just a game, played by people you don't know, and you'll still be living, breathing, and functioning come Sunday.
That is all...
Stephen's QB rating was worse than Crompton's QB rating... last season by itself.
:lolabove:truth! :worship:
Kiffin better watch out with his defense of this clown... I think we all know Kiffin's goal is to show recruits, "Look we're a QB away from a great season, come to UT!!" And that's exactly why he's not playing Nick, if Nick looks good, it might scare off a Scroggins because these QB's want to come in and start, not sit on the bench behind Stephens.
IMO, Stephens should transfer. I don't think CLK has been upfront with him at all.... How could it have been a "tough" decision to start JC over NS if when JC has shown he's inept and CLK still won't give NS a shot?
Yes, because things worked out so well in 2005 when Fulmer started yanking QBs in and out based on who had screwed up the most recently, right? The only thing worse than terrible QB play is terrible QB play plus a team-dividing QB controversy.
I love how half the guys who happily sat through a decade of coaching incompetence are already taking shots at the new guy four weeks in.
For God's sake man. Crompton leading the offense turned the ball over in FOUR CONSECUTIVE trips on the field against UCLA. Leaving Crompton in cost us that game, plain and simple. How many more games will CLK lose to stubbornly leave Crompton in?
Crompton must have some nekkid pics of Layla or something. Crompton should have had the headset on after the first play of the second half.
As for the Fulmer comment, I was as big a critic of his coaching as anyone - I just left out the classless name calling that is so popular on here. Despite his faults I supported him as the coach of UT, just like I do Kiffin. I'll defend Kiffin as the coach of UT just as hard as I'll criticize his coaching decision to keep Crompton in the UCLA game.