We won so it’s not an “excuse” but REFS.

#56
#56
Gotta say that Banks and his defense were much more problematic than the refs in this one. Instead of looking for external causes for our issues, perhaps we should look within? I'd start with Banks and the defensive staff and players along with the man that assembled this coaching staff

Until he feels heat Heupel won’t change a thing. He is the most passive coach I can remember. It shows with the refs, too. Refs respect someone who is on them a lot. Heupel will simply not expend the energy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: heupelsroutetree
#59
#59
Until he feels heat Heupel won’t change a thing. He is the most passive coach I can remember. It shows with the refs, too. Refs respect someone who is on them a lot. Heupel will simply not expend the energy.

Brother I’m not sure what you saw. My child read Heups lips and started giggling.
 
#70
#70
Incompetence from an officiating crew is one thing, but malfeasance is a far worse problem that should be dealt with by the SEC.
But it won't be because Stankey either doesn't care or is sinister enough to actually enjoy the chaos it creates.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mpfvol and I4Vols
#73
#73
Incompetence from an officiating crew is one thing, but malfeasance is a far worse problem that should be dealt with by the SEC.
But it won't be because Stankey either doesn't care or is sinister enough to actually enjoy the chaos it creates.

68747470733a2f2f73332e616d617a6f6e6177732e636f6d2f776174747061642d6d656469612d736572766963652f53746f7279496d6167652f556555452d7267656257396d59513d3d2d3731343737303133322e313539323039643466646331346262353335323831313739323931372e676966
 
Advertisement



Back
Top