Pruitt Will Do It
Old Fan Of The Vols
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2018
- Messages
- 2,716
- Likes
- 3,155
Rather change a diaperTrue ... and for all the valid criticism of Jones for choking away the Oklahoma and Florida games in 2015 and then Florida again last year... have you ever seen a team look as confused as we did at the end of the LSU game in 2010? That was awful coaching.
Granted, arguing over Dooley and Jones is like arguing over what's worse, changing a diaper or cleaning up vomit but still, one is definitely worse than the other.
I was talking purely as a coach of football. Even with his problems, Jones negotiated the political part of the job much better than Dooley. He had more energy and success in recruiting.By no means is this a defense of Jones, but I don't see how you can say this. Jones recruited significantly better than Dooley did. Jones did win some games of actual consequence while at UT (South Carolina '13, Georgia '15 and '16, Florida '16). Dooley never won anything of consequence at UT. Jones won 3 bowl games. Dooley only even made 1 bowl game.
I know that was a popular thing to say but IMO it isn't true. Dooley didn't recruit well at all and had pretty much quit by the end of his 2nd year. But he left Jones an NFL quality OL. There were some depth and talent holes but was also AJ, Maggitt, and a few others that were decent players. If you go back and look at what Dooley inherited from Kiffin… it wasn't good. There were no QB's.... none. Dooley iirc got Sims to come in and then replaced him with Bray a Fr in mid-season. Tauren Poole was basically the only RB left.Dooley inherited a mess... So did Jones.
Hunter's injury broke Dooley. He put all of his hopes in having a good year that year and using it for recruiting. Might not have worked... but he pretty much quit toward the end of that second season. There was a report that went around that he tried to get UT to terminate him before the 3rd year.
You must be talking about the VFL program or possibly his contributions to the design of the Anderson Training Center... but with that you also have to remember how much trouble the football team was collectively in, academically, at the end of Dooley's tenure. They were facing the possibility of NCAA sanctions as a result. Under Jones, they did recover. Tennessee's APR (Academic Progress Rate) is currently 972 (which is acceptable) ... when Dooley left in 2012, it was 924.Say what you want about Dooley, he laid a good off field foundation ... he was a good gap fill.. utad fault for the results
He talks about his time at Louisiana Tech as if it was a success. He was 17-20 in 3 seasons with a 12-12 record in the WAC. His best season was 8-5. His last two recruiting classes in '11 and '12 were a disaster. He didn't sign even one single offensive lineman in the class of '11. What does he mean nobody was listening to him? What did he ever say that was worth hearing? "Let's use 14 men on this goal line stand and see if we can get away with it?"
Sorry if this has been posted but if not, get a load of this crap: Derek Dooley reflects on what went wrong at Tennessee: “Very few people listened to me”
Freak can you install a like x 100 button pleaseWhat went wrong? Well lets see. First off, we fured a HOF coach who went 152-52. Then we hired a loser who had never coached college football, then got in trouble. Then we hire an even bigger loser who was more concerned with shower etiquette than actual coaching. Finally we hired a pop warner coach who drove the program into a ditch. Oh and how could I forget that we have an administraton who literally does whatever one big booster says.
But its just as easy and accurate to say that what went wrong with Tennessee is Jimmy Haslam.
Hunter's injury broke Dooley. He put all of his hopes in having a good year that year and using it for recruiting. Might not have worked... but he pretty much quit toward the end of that second season. There was a report that went around that he tried to get UT to terminate him before the 3rd year.
What went wrong:
He was a lazy and sucky recruiter.
He didn't have enough quality coaches though he did have Wilcox for a while, Chaney, Pittman and Gillespie.
He didn't recruit speed and he didn't inherit a lot either.
He didn't motivate the team and adequately address the discipline problems. If he did, we would have never lost to Kentucky or that god awful blown lead verses Mizzou.
A lot of this is true but he left an OL with 4/5 starters in their last year of eligibility and hadn’t signed one in his last recruiting class. He left Jones some players but team speed was pathetic to the point that Palardy ran the fastest time in that first pro day. And Kiffin left Dooley Simms and Bray (Kiffin, not Dooley landed both)...who both made NFL rosters. Dooley bequeathed Jones...Worley. Hard working, dedicated, good soldier, injury prone...Worley. Jones flipped that roster to the point that we were UNDERachieving in two seasons...no small feat. Jones failed...Dooley made it an art form.I was talking purely as a coach of football. Even with his problems, Jones negotiated the political part of the job much better than Dooley. He had more energy and success in recruiting.
I know that was a popular thing to say but IMO it isn't true. Dooley didn't recruit well at all and had pretty much quit by the end of his 2nd year. But he left Jones an NFL quality OL. There were some depth and talent holes but was also AJ, Maggitt, and a few others that were decent players. If you go back and look at what Dooley inherited from Kiffin… it wasn't good. There were no QB's.... none. Dooley iirc got Sims to come in and then replaced him with Bray a Fr in mid-season. Tauren Poole was basically the only RB left.
Neither guy inherited a good situation. Neither guy inherited a roster nearly as good as the one Pruitt inherits. But it has always been my opinion that Dooley had a much higher mountain to climb.