War in Ukraine

Targeting apartment buildings doesn't have the same economic impact as having your petroleum processing infrastructure destroyed when you have a war economy that is maintained by your ability to process and export fossil fuels.
dean-supernatural.gif

That is beside the point. That is a stupid strawman from a very insane person. The Ukraine would have been out of energy years ago if they did, why do you think their grid is only recently been targeted at scale by the Russians? No, that would have not changed the war. The Ukraine continues to this day to buy through third parties Russian energy products in various form.

Your comments on F-14s is literally so stupid its hard to even comment, that isn't how any of this works.

YOU LOST and yes you are vested in this and you lost, what you have described is idiotic if not insane. What you even wanting to give them does not even exist at scale and no amounts of missiles the U.S. has would have made any difference.

image.gif


YOu said that Russia was about to economically collapse years ago you nut, rinsing and repeating stuff isn't going to change anything... you lost.

I love the "we" part. 😂

War in Ukraine

We're one step closer to Russia having to retreat from Ukraine, and Putin getting chucked out of a window as Russia breaks up into 7 different countries due to an economic collapse?

War in Ukraine

Fortunately for Ukraine, it's not 600,000 combat troops. You have to remember, Russia's entire logistics system, is literally human-powered. They don't even use fork trucks most of the time, as their munitions and are not packaged in a way that a fork truck can be utilized to move them, and as such pretty much every box has to be moved by hands.


Russia is going to lose the war because they don't have fork lifts. Gold, Jerry, Gold.
 
Last edited:
Again, why destroy Russia’s petroleum facilities when we could just eliminate the market for their products by forcing our allies to quit buying them?

Da Pootin is going to die for the 8th time from cancer, and Beard is going to predict if the U.S. would just just give them F-14s, F-16s, Abram tanks, Hmars, (insert next wonder weapon) the Ukrainians would win. Apparently all the Ukrainians needed were some fork lifts.

Why don't you just listen to him?

😂
 
Last edited:
https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https://preview.redd.it/ua-pov-according-to-ukrainian-publication-censor-trump-has-v0-zn2dvsi8xx3g1.jpeg?width=1080&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=1b99d6c5b0ce828a3a41586cf936727cb4cdca83

Kind of how it looks to a degree. My take is work off the 28 part plan, which is kind of idiotic in nature and just keep scratching the players that don't want to play. Europe has no real incentive to stop the war unless its a Russia collapse, and the Ukraine leadership has no incentive to stop the war because the Ukraine will lose all funding and the leadership will be hunted down by their own people.

Easiest way out at this point without sanctioning Europe and the Ukraine is to start normal relations with Russia and unfreeze the Russian assets for either partial payment or joint economic benefit. The rest will eventually just work itself out if not very quickly. The U.S than goes from being on the losing team to either on the side lines or the winning team. The winning team are the good guys and will write the history.

Timing is ticking on the Russia assets so if Trump wants to turn this loser into an even hand, time is probably of importance, or the U.S. will be on the side of the losing bad guys yet again.
 
A lot of great points from both sides, you can either escalate or deescalate. Can't be done without US involvement. Only problem with that is Trump has no idea how to accomplish either and will choose his way to do it which will be a lose-lose for the US.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol
A lot of great points from both sides, you can either escalate or deescalate. Can't be done without US involvement. Only problem with that is Trump has no idea how to accomplish either and will choose his way to do it which will be a lose-lose for the US.

Or neither i.e. steady as she goes. The U.S. can either elect to try and salvage any funds it has wasted in this fiasco or not.

lose-lose for the US

The U.S. is on the loser side of the equation and has been since the beginning. The U.S. can possibly negotiate a path to the winning side but that is limited in nature, and time wise probably limited as well. Exclude the Europeans and the Ukrainians from the discussion and the U.S. can become a non-loser or on the winning side of the equation.

 
Or neither i.e. steady as she goes. The U.S. can either elect to try and salvage any funds it has wasted in this fiasco or not.



The U.S. is on the loser side of the equation and has been since the beginning. The U.S. can possibly negotiate a path to the winning side but that is limited in nature, and time wise probably limited as well. Exclude the Europeans and the Ukrainians from the discussion and the U.S. can become a non-loser or on the winning side of the equation.


Wasting funds seems to be the goal here with deployments and the Argentina Bailout as Americans get drained of resources by high costs, special projects, health care, and chasing wild geese. See a lot going out but nothing coming in. Add to it troop deployments and snap. Robinhood in reverse poor taking it in the shorts. Social security talks, defense budget decreasing. Amateurs and a govt ran business with the plan of a man that recorded several bankruptcies and grifted millions. Real win with a group of people in over their heads. One can understand why Europeans don't Trust the US. Throws out the bone of doing away with income tax and then spends that money on his projects. Tariffs are taxes. Trump will say anything to get a vote and deliver on 20% of the time.
 
Wasting funds seems to be the goal here with deployments and the Argentina Bailout as Americans get drained of resources by high costs, special projects, health care, and chasing wild geese. See a lot going out but nothing coming in. Add to it troop deployments and snap. Robinhood in reverse poor taking it in the shorts. Social security talks, defense budget decreasing. Amateurs and a govt ran business with the plan of a man that recorded several bankruptcies and grifted millions. Real win with a group of people in over their heads. One can understand why Europeans don't Trust the US. Throws out the bone of doing away with income tax and then spends that money on his projects. Tariffs are taxes. Trump will say anything to get a vote and deliver on 20% of the time.

A President that delivers at 20% is GOAT. For me, its pretty simple... keep us out of all these unnecessary wars/conflicts and deport the illegals, the rest nobody is going to fix.

One can understand why Europeans don't Trust the US.

We're not their friends and they're not our friends. Any illusion as to that has now been exposed. I do feel bad to a degree for the Ukrainians, but being used as a pawn actually requires one to allow themselves to be put in that position. Either way, I don't have any solution for them that one is going to like.

> the U.S. can maybe salvage part of its sake or the history???? tick tock on this though
> Europe is a loser
> Ukraine is a loser
> Russia will be the winner that writes the history unless something drastically changes... although it came at its own expense

Nothing has really changed since late 2022 or early 2023, the most likely path is just playing out. As I mentioned long ago, the end result might be the total elimination of a whole large county at scale -> not sure it has ever happened quite like this in all of recorded history.
 
Last edited:
A President that delivers at 20% is GOAT. For me, its pretty simple... keep us out of all these unnecessary wars/conflicts and deport the illegals, the rest nobody is going to fix.



We're not their friends and they're not our friends. Any illusion as to that has now been exposed. I do feel bad to a degree for the Ukrainians, but being used as a pawn actually requires one to allow themselves to be put in that position. Either way, I don't have any solution for them that one is going to like.

> the U.S. can maybe salvage part of its sake or the history
> Europe is a loser
> Ukraine is a loser
> Russia will be the winner that writes the history unless something drastically changes... although it came at its own expense

Nothing has really changed since late 2022 or early 2023, the most likely path is just playing out.
Greatest of All Time in his and your mind evidently. We can live and survive as isolationist, but that will never happen because of immigration of the past. Europe is a loser in what aspect? As far as Ukraine is concerned they were a loser before and nothing has changed except the Russia invasion and claims so Nothing is new here. Who is left to stand up to Russia with Trump in Russia's Putin's back pocket. China sits by and watches as they damage the markets and cause Trump to weaken his stance on Tariffs with them and other areas of concern, Taiwan. His plan is taking a chunk out of the American purse. 20% is a failing grade.
 
That is beside the point. That is a stupid strawman from a very insane person. The Ukraine would have been out of energy years ago if they did, why do you think their grid is only recently been targeted at scale by the Russians? No, that would have not changed the war. The Ukraine continues to this day to buy through third parties Russian energy products in various form.

Your comments on F-14s is literally so stupid its hard to even comment, that isn't how any of this works.

YOU LOST and yes you are vested in this and you lost, what you have described is idiotic if not insane. What you even wanting to give them does not even exist at scale and no amounts of missiles the U.S. has would have made any difference.

image.gif


YOu said that Russia was about to economically collapse years ago you nut, rinsing and repeating stuff isn't going to change anything... you lost.

I love the "we" part. 😂

War in Ukraine



War in Ukraine




Russia is going to lose the war because they don't have fork lifts. Gold, Jerry, Gold.
Lol, you couldn't come up with an actual response, so you decided make a stream of consciousness post in your frustration?

Russia targets Ukrainian civilians, Ukraine targets Russian oil infrastructure. One of these is militarily affective, there other is not.



If Ukraine had more long range munitions, Russia's petroleum processing industry would cease to exist as the only economic engine left to fund their war economy, given the damage that Ukraine is currently doing, just with their own home-grown drones.


The reality of this seems to be a struggle for you, and made you very emotional for some reason.

giphy.gif
 
Lol, you couldn't come up with an actual response, so you decided make a stream of consciousness post in your frustration?

Russia targets Ukrainian civilians, Ukraine targets Russian oil infrastructure. One of these is militarily affective, there other is not.



If Ukraine had more long range munitions, Russia's petroleum processing industry would cease to exist as the only economic engine left to fund their war economy, given the damage that Ukraine is currently doing, just with their own home-grown drones.


The reality of this seems to be a struggle for you, and made you very emotional for some reason.

giphy.gif

1. you never proposed what you are claiming now you are proposing... you wanted F-14s, and abrams
2. even if you did, just because you impact some infrastructure doesn't mean jack to the conflict... its like saying you take out energy here that cuba can defeat the U.S.
3. the problem was never energy or weapons... there are no wonder weapons

I propose we give the Ukraine cotton candy as that will have about the same impact.

You are making up insane stuff from top to bottom, YOU LOST. I told you for years why your position was not going to yield much. Why would I need tissue, you are the one crying here. You lost. All of your comments from F-14s to tanks to Russia's economy is toast are just insane takes.

86a76a4c-6c92-4b1e-afca-cad30f91ed64_text.gif


Maybe stick to your mom's basement because at the end of the day that might be your top potential. These are not bad takes, they're insane takes.
 
Last edited:
Greatest of All Time in his and your mind evidently. We can live and survive as isolationist, but that will never happen because of immigration of the past. Europe is a loser in what aspect? As far as Ukraine is concerned they were a loser before and nothing has changed except the Russia invasion and claims so Nothing is new here. Who is left to stand up to Russia with Trump in Russia's Putin's back pocket. China sits by and watches as they damage the markets and cause Trump to weaken his stance on Tariffs with them and other areas of concern, Taiwan. His plan is taking a chunk out of the American purse. 20% is a failing grade.
I never said he was but if any president hits 20% he would be. You claimed the 20%, not me.

20% is a failing grade.

That would be the greatest president of all time by a long shot.
 
1. you never proposed what you are claiming now you are proposing... you wanted F-14s, and abrams
2. even if you did, just because you impact some infrastructure doesn't mean jack to the conflict... its like saying you take out energy here that cuba can defeat the U.S.
3. the problem was never energy or weapons... there are no wonder weapons

I propose we give the Ukraine cotton candy as that will have about the same impact.

You are making up insane stuff from top to bottom, YOU LOST. I told you for years why your position was not going to yield much Why would I need tissue, you are the one crying here. You lost. All of your comments from F-14s to tanks to Russia's economy is toast are just insane takes.

86a76a4c-6c92-4b1e-afca-cad30f91ed64_text.gif


Sti
Lol why are you fixating on a (false) claim that I said Ukraine should be given F-14s?

F-14s haven't been in service in 20 years.
 
Wasting funds seems to be the goal here with deployments and the Argentina Bailout as Americans get drained of resources by high costs, special projects, health care, and chasing wild geese. See a lot going out but nothing coming in. Add to it troop deployments and snap. Robinhood in reverse poor taking it in the shorts. Social security talks, defense budget decreasing. Amateurs and a govt ran business with the plan of a man that recorded several bankruptcies and grifted millions. Real win with a group of people in over their heads. One can understand why Europeans don't Trust the US. Throws out the bone of doing away with income tax and then spends that money on his projects. Tariffs are taxes. Trump will say anything to get a vote and deliver on 20% of the time.

When did this happen? Pretty sure we're topping close to $1T in defense spending in the BBB.
 
Lol why are you fixating on a (false) claim that I said Ukraine should be given F-14s?

F-14s haven't been in service in 20 years.

I posted it on the last page. You are correct they really haven't been used in 20 years regardless if its F-14s, F-16s, F-22s, Abrams (which is what you were also saying), or your wonder weapons -> the chances YOU didn't lose was very close to 0%. There isn't any 3d chess going on. Look, everyone is wrong from time to time, or not exact.... I have a few things in the thread which I would say could have been more accurate in timing. Regardless, most of what you are putting thread is beyond idiotic, it's clearly mentality unstable. Russians aren't going to win because they don't have forklifts. Stay in your mom's basement and play video games, because the only other place you would fit is a facility. Most of the loonies left this thread years ago, but apparently not the most damaged ones.

They LOST, and no you didn't say all the things you are claiming now, you are making up **** to cover up your insane takes.

They LOST, which means you LOST because you are invested. Personally, I don't really care per se who "wins" but I just want my money not to be involved in this insane **** show which has been the U.S. foreign policy for 60 years.

The Ukraine is well on its ways to being completely taken off the map for doing what you have suggested in this thread. Bravo. 👏👏👏
 
Last edited:
I posted it on the last page. You are correct they really haven't been used in 20 years regardless if its F-14s, F-16s, F-22s, Abrams (which is what you were also saying), or your wonder weapons -> the chances YOU didn't lose was very close to 0%. There isn't any 3d chess going on. Look, everyone is wrong from time to time, or not exact.... I have a few things in the thread which I would say could have been more accurate in timing. Regardless, most of what you are putting thread is beyond idiotic, it's clearly mentality unstable. Russians aren't going to win because they don't have forklifts. Stay in your mom's basement and play video games, because the only other place you would fit is a facility. Most of the loonies left this thread years ago, but apparently not the most damaged ones.

They LOST, and no you didn't say all the things you are claiming now, you are making up **** to cover up your insane takes.

They LOST, which means you LOST because you are invested. Personally, I don't really care per se who "wins" but I just want my money not to be involved in this insane **** show which has been the U.S. foreign policy for 60 years.

The Ukraine is well on its ways to being completely taken off the map for doing what you have suggested in this thread. Bravo. 👏👏👏
Lol, it suddenly "doesn't matter" because you're wrong.

Which seems to be the standard response from you these days when your (moronic) proclamations don't stand up to reality.

1764422309959.png
1000005937.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: jvol1
Lol, it suddenly "doesn't matter" because you're wrong.

Which seems to be the standard response from you these days when your (moronic) proclamations don't stand up to reality.

View attachment 793570
View attachment 793572
The read between the lines on this is that russia has lost too much and cant keep up the offensive. They're just looking for a way to salvage anything from this moronic invasion that they can. Trump seems prone to play into giving the russians a deal that will set them up for some sort of future war. If Russia wants peace all they have to do is stop attacking.
 
The read between the lines on this is that russia has lost too much and cant keep up the offensive. They're just looking for a way to salvage anything from this moronic invasion that they can. Trump seems prone to play into giving the russians a deal that will set them up for some sort of future war. If Russia wants peace all they have to do is stop attacking.

Russia can, but not without taking more men out of their already fragile war economy, and sending them to die.

The military itself and the military industrial complex are already competing for the same bodies, and both are necessary to keep up offensive operations.

"Rob Peter to pay Paul" in order to get more troops for the meat assaults, and you don't have enough workers to keep up munitions and drone production. All the while both the military and war production are having to pay workers more to compete with each other.

It's why Russia is trying to get more North Koreans, and is even tapping Africa for mercenaries.

Trump is trying to bail Russia out because Witkoff is convinced that he can get billions for himself and Trump by forcing Ukraine to capitulate to Putin. People like Trump and Witkoff are wholly unable to imagine that Putin won't be swayed by billions in business deals, because they would sell their own children into slavery for that kind of money; Putin doesn't care about money, just power.
 
Russia can, but not without taking more men out of their already fragile war economy, and sending them to die.

The military itself and the military industrial complex are already competing for the same bodies, and both are necessary to keep up offensive operations.

"Rob Peter to pay Paul" in order to get more troops for the meat assaults, and you don't have enough workers to keep up munitions and drone production. All the while both the military and war production are having to pay workers more to compete with each other.

It's why Russia is trying to get more North Koreans, and is even tapping Africa for mercenaries.

Trump is trying to bail Russia out because Witkoff is convinced that he can get billions for himself and Trump by forcing Ukraine to capitulate to Putin. People like Trump and Witkoff are wholly unable to imagine that Putin won't be swayed by billions in business deals, because they would sell their own children into slavery for that kind of money; Putin doesn't care about money, just power.

If the Ukraine is winning there is no way to force the Ukraine to do anything. This is literally just insanity post to insanity post.

Yes, the Russian economy is so bad you have been calling for it to collapse for three years. Apparently, the Ukraine is almost done and they'll have to stop speaking Russian in Moscow soon.

giphy.gif


Some serious mental health problems with an overlap of serious TDS, complete void of reality.
 
Last edited:
I wonder how much of this is true:
The WSJ link: https://www.wsj.com/world/russia/russia-u-s-peace-business-ties-4db9b290?mod=hp_lead_pos7
 
A President that delivers at 20% is GOAT. For me, its pretty simple... keep us out of all these unnecessary wars/conflicts and deport the illegals, the rest nobody is going to fix.



We're not their friends and they're not our friends. Any illusion as to that has now been exposed. I do feel bad to a degree for the Ukrainians, but being used as a pawn actually requires one to allow themselves to be put in that position. Either way, I don't have any solution for them that one is going to like.

> the U.S. can maybe salvage part of its sake or the history???? tick tock on this though
> Europe is a loser
> Ukraine is a loser
> Russia will be the winner that writes the history unless something drastically changes... although it came at its own expense

Nothing has really changed since late 2022 or early 2023, the most likely path is just playing out. As I mentioned long ago, the end result might be the total elimination of a whole large county at scale -> not sure it has ever happened quite like this in all of recorded history.
You threw a number out there and if 20% is all that you need to name him a GOAT then you have some serious rethinking to do. A 20% is reserved for ditch diggers and garbage collectors. Some mentality deranged could score that on a aptitude. If that is your standard which it appears to be then you have low standards.
Avoids Conflicts, turmoil. Trump creates it everyday he speaks. Avoids Conflicts? He creates conflicts every time he opens his mouth. Argentina?, Republicans and Democrats? Trump loves the chaos and confusion. He is looking for a conflict every turn. Talk is cheap and Trump knows it but he uses threatening remarks to obtain people and countries to go at each other and watches. We don't have a leader we have a puppet master pulling strings and grifting America.
 
You threw a number out there and if 20% is all that you need to name him a GOAT then you have some serious rethinking to do. A 20% is reserved for ditch diggers and garbage collectors. Some mentality deranged could score that on a aptitude. If that is your standard which it appears to be then you have low standards.
Avoids Conflicts, turmoil. Trump creates it everyday he speaks. Avoids Conflicts? He creates conflicts every time he opens his mouth. Argentina?, Republicans and Democrats? Trump loves the chaos and confusion. He is looking for a conflict every turn. Talk is cheap and Trump knows it but he uses threatening remarks to obtain people and countries to go at each other and watches. We don't have a leader we have a puppet master pulling strings and grifting America.

You threw out the 20% number which I have already pointed out.

As far as the reality, 20% is a wet dream buddy, which is why I don't vote.

Wasting funds seems to be the goal here with deployments and the Argentina Bailout as Americans get drained of resources by high costs, special projects, health care, and chasing wild geese. See a lot going out but nothing coming in. Add to it troop deployments and snap. Robinhood in reverse poor taking it in the shorts. Social security talks, defense budget decreasing. Amateurs and a govt ran business with the plan of a man that recorded several bankruptcies and grifted millions. Real win with a group of people in over their heads. One can understand why Europeans don't Trust the US. Throws out the bone of doing away with income tax and then spends that money on his projects. Tariffs are taxes. >>>>> Trump will say anything to get a vote and deliver on 20% of the time.<<<<<<<
 
You threw out the 20% number which I have already pointed out.

As far as the reality, 20% is a wet dream buddy, which is why I don't vote.

Reread your post and 20% still appears to be your standard. Thank you for not voting, but I can understand why you did not vote this last election.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top