Voter ID Law Struck Down in PA

[YorkVol]

I couldn't find the previous thread on this. But the photo ID law was struck down today. Judge says showing your ID is an unnecessary burden to voting.

Voter ID law struck down by Pa. judge who says it's unreasonable burden to vote | PennLive.com

Mods, merge in the other thread if you want.

 

[utvolpj]

Judge says showing your ID is an unnecessary burden to voting.

if that's true then registration seems to also fit. Can't wait to see the "we trust you - just show up and vote"

 

[lawgator1]

I think you are missing the second point, which is that the state was unable to justify why it was necessary. That's ultimately the problem.

 

[FLVOL69]

This just reinforces what is common knowledge... Democrats are to ****ing stupid and lazy to obtain a photo id.

 

[hog88]

I think you are missing the second point, which is that the state was unable to justify why it was necessary. That's ultimately the problem.

How do they justify requiring residents to present photo identification to buy booze?

 

[Grand Vol]

I think you are missing the second point, which is that the state was unable to justify why it was necessary. That's ultimately the problem.

Do you think official government issued photo ID should be required to be able to vote?

 

[tim]

How do they justify requiring residents to present photo identification to buy booze?

They pass that out on voting day. No ID required.

 

[lawgator1]

How do they justify requiring residents to present photo identification to buy booze?

You have to be 21 to buy.

Also, buying booze isn't a fundamental right.

 

[FLVOL69]

You have to be 21 to buy.

Also, buying booze isn't a fundamental right.

Sure it is ...

 

[Obsessed]

You have to be 21 to buy.

Also, buying booze isn't a fundamental right.

Link to voting being a right?

 

[lawgator1]

Do you think official government issued photo ID should be required to be able to vote?

I think the GOP sees the requirement as a way to suppress voters who are typically Dems.

 

[govols/cc]

I think you are missing the second point, which is that the state was unable to justify why it was necessary. That's ultimately the problem.

Lets just start making up our social security numbers. That'll help after you muck one up. It's odd how some are too damn lazy to go get an ID & use lame ass excuses yet will find a way to jump in a line a mile long for free money or anything free.

 

[utvolpj]

I think the GOP sees the requirement as a way to suppress voters who are typically Dems.

so Dem voters don't drink, smoke, drive, cash checks, apply for jobs, rent apartments, buy homes, etc?

 

[govols/cc]

I think the GOP sees the requirement as a way to suppress voters who are typically Dems.

I think dems see it as a way to hinder their vote buying & country demise mission.

 

[tim]

I think the GOP sees the requirement as a way to suppress voters who are typically Dems.

Link? I think Dems see this as a way to call GOP'ers racist.....no I dont have a link.

 

[lawgator1]

Link to voting being a right?

Transcript of the Constitution of the United States - Official Text

 

[lawgator1]

I think dems see it as a way to hinder their vote buying & country demise mission.

The amount of voting fraud is infinitesimal.

 

[tim]

The amount of voting fraud is infinitesimal.

Who investigates it? Who reports it? Exxxactly.

 

[govols/cc]

The amount of voting fraud is infinitesimal.

What about food stamp & disability fraud?

 

[tim]

What about food stamp & disability fraud?

Who investigates/reports it? Exxxactly.

 

[Obsessed]

Transcript of the Constitution of the United States - Official Text

Scholars and courts often note that the Constitution nowhere says, "All individuals have the right to vote." It simply rules out specific limitations on "the right to vote." A right not guaranteed in affirmative terms isn't really a "right" in a fundamental sense, this reading suggests.

 

[utvolpj]

Transcript of the Constitution of the United States - Official Text

2nd amendment listed in your link?

 

[lawgator1]

2nd amendment listed in your link?

I think people in well regulated militias should have them. Like the National Guard. Or any official state militia.

 

[hndog609]

I think people in well regulated militias should have them. Like the National Guard. Or any official state militia.

Heller got it right and for the right reasons. Deal with it.

 

[govols/cc]

I think people in well regulated militias should have them. Like the National Guard. Or any official state militia.

I think able bodied people should have to work for food & money. Oh yea thanks for showing how you like to pick & choose what part of the constitution you want to live by.