TheBigOne10
FU Money
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2011
- Messages
- 20,438
- Likes
- 60,222
My prediction is that the university won't reinstate VP before January. The real question is whether he will be back for spring practice next year...
that may very well be the case. and though it might look like it goes against what i've been posting in this thread, i hope that's the case. i just don't think we can go blindly in to the night and expect everything to be warm and fuzzy now.It makes sense to me, I just feel you may be over-analyzing it a little bit. To 90% of the people out there, the verbiage used will be taken as "he is innocent", and his reinstatement will be expected.
that may very well be the case. and though it might look like it goes against what i've been posting in this thread, i hope that's the case. i just don't think we can go blindly in to the night and expect everything to be warm and fuzzy now.
does he DESERVE to be reinstated, yes. Sadly though, i don't think that sentiment will be shared by everyone, for all the reasons i've outlined.
Recruiters from other schools will tear this program apart if that is true. They will out there telling kids, " Look at what UT did to Von Pearson. You don't want to go there."
While I agree that it's BS if he's innocent of everything, but exactly what rights of his were violated?
i seriously don't get why everyone is so excited. "insufficient evidence" just means they couldn't find enough proof to prosecute. it doesn't mean that nothing happened, and he's completely innocent of all accusations.
there's a bigger picture folks.
Really? So our judicial system is flawed huh? Yes it does mean nothing happened. So what's the bigger picture? Quit with the political correctness bs. Maybe the girl lied. When it doesn't go your way there is always a "what if."
gimmie a break, please.........you're fooling yourself if you think it's that simple.
One that comes to mind immediately is the fact that all Americans are supposed to have the right to a speedy trial. Implied in that is the length of an "investigation" into the facts or lack thereof concerning accusations made. It should never, EVER, take four months to gather "facts" in a case like this and four months emphatically IS NOT SPEEDY by any reasonable measure.
Also, all Americans are supposed to have the right to be considered innocent [meaning that they are not supposed to be PENALIZED prematurely, which Mr. Pearson most assuredly has been] until proven guilty.
what? no.
i think i've spelled out my concern. and it has nothing to do with the actual process of the investigation. i've said, the process worked. he will not be charged, and there wasn't enough evidence to do so. that in and of itself is not a bad thing, and i'm happy for Von, that this can be put behind him. and we should all be glad that the process did work itself out. that shouldn't be lost here.
my questioning here is only involving the perception of the football program and university regarding reinstating Von. and i've said several times, that it may just simply be verbiage used by the DA.
i just think it's a bit naive of us to look at this situation and not think that there won't be those that will look at us unfavorably given the 121 investigations currently going on, the incidents in the NFL, the incidents at FSU and the recent incidents we've had at UT.
i don't think it's a stretch to say that given all these factors, how the university and program responds to this news will get some attention.
make sense?
