jakez4ut
Patience... It's what's for dinner
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2005
- Messages
- 72,535
- Likes
- 133,081
Florida should beat Miami by at least two touchdowns this season. The 'Canes will be improved this year, ready to compete for an ACC title next year, and will have sufficient talent and experience to have National Title aspirations '10. The ACC is certainly deeper than the Big East was, but if the "U" is taking care of their own backyard in recruiting in the manner they should, it won't matter.Hat, how far away from being nationally competitive is Miami? Florida ought to beat them this year, but I've thought that in the past and been hugely disappointed. I do think Florida ought to be able to handle them this year, I really do.
But in two years?
Is Miami on its way back or is this fleeting excitement down there?
P.S. I won't ask you what you think of them being in the ACC as a factor against long-term success. But if you care to comment ....
Actually, I think the North may be deeper than the South in the Big XII. See Kansas State's victories over Texas the last two years and Colorado's '07 win over Oklahoma.i knew they were bad.....i just can't fathom a Nebraska team that was THAT bad on defense......
i guess the good news is they're in the big 12 north....the road back shouldn't be as long as some others.....
i would say that applied to Kansas more so than Mizzou.....for last year......
Mizzou and Illinois played each other last year didn't they? and if memory serves.......mizzou won?Ask Ohio State about Illinois.
i can't put long term faith in KSU or Colorado....both teams have been really bad recently....to me it'd be like saying the same of KY and VAndy because of recent success against LSU, GA and TN.....Actually, I think the North may be deeper than the South in the Big XII. See Kansas State's victories over Texas the last two years and Colorado's '07 win over Oklahoma.
Florida should beat Miami by at least two touchdowns this season. The 'Canes will be improved this year, ready to compete for an ACC title next year, and will have sufficient talent and experience to have National Title aspirations '10. The ACC is certainly deeper than the Big East was, but if the "U" is taking care of their own backyard in recruiting in the manner they should, it won't matter.
Yeah, Missouri won a game played in St. Louis on a 99 yard fumble return, with Juice Williams missing a substantial portion of the game. I bet the Illini are petrified.Or, something more relevant - ask Illinois about Missouri.
Not to mention the fact that we're dealing with different teams than were on the field last year...
Name the last time Baylor or Oklahoma State beat anyone of consequence.Mizzou and Illinois played each other last year didn't they? and if memory serves.......mizzou won?
i can't put long term faith in KSU or Colorado....both teams have been really bad recently....to me it'd be like saying the same of KY and VAndy because of recent success against LSU, GA and TN.....
the phrase "sh*t happens" comes to mind.....![]()
VegasInsider.com: Odds for top teams to win BCS Championship
Southern California 3/1 3/1
Florida 6/1 5/1
Oklahoma 6/1 6/1
Georgia 10/1 8/1
Ohio State 8/1 8/1
Missouri 10/1 10/1
Texas 10/1 10/1
West Virginia 15/1 15/1
Clemson 20/1 20/1
Auburn 25/1 20/1
Virginia Tech 22/1 22/1
Kansas 25/1 25/1
Louisiana State 15/1 25/1
Tennessee 30/1 30/1
You've got to remember that they are not saying that these other teams with lower odds are better than UT. They are saying that they have a better chance to win the BCS.
Big difference.
Yeah, Missouri won a game played in St. Louis on a 99 yard fumble return, with Juice Williams missing a substantial portion of the game. I bet the Illini are petrified.