BigVolFan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 653
- Likes
- 56
and you don't believe they couldn't afford to pay his buyout do youUCLA got humiliated because they couldn't afford to pay Rick's buyout and they're trying to save face
UCLA Basketball Forum
Let’s pay the janitor $100k to coach and have we can all have fun, amirite?
I think the not being able to afford the buyout has been thrown out there to save face. Why in the world would you even attempt to talk to the guys they have offered if you cant afford the buyout......all of them have a higher buyout than CRB.I think it was a combination of Rick Barnes wanting to stay,him wanting a raise and UCLA not being able to afford the buyout because they're paying Jim Mora Jr's and Steve Alford's buyouts
so u rather us be mediocre so ticket prices stay low? Wow, do u feel that way towards football too? I'm sure Clemson fans hate their ticket prices...damn championships...Awesome? I get your meaning, but I have to shake my head when people rejoice because we're spending even more money for a coach. I guess since fans don't receive a bill directly for his services it's lost the impact. When fans see seat prices go up, concessions go up, parking go up, etc, I hope they don't whine about it. Rejoice that we've now got to spend 4.7 million for a guy to coach a bunch of kids to play basketball. My word. It's akin to paying taxes. The fact that we don't have to write a check at the end of the year but instead the govt takes a bite every paycheck makes it something most folks ignore. They rejoice when they get a refund thinking it's free money from the govt. Pay that bill at the end of the year or better yet, in Nov right before elections and they'd damned well feel differently. Sorry for the rant. Again, not a slam on you. Just crazy that we wear spending that much money for a coach as something like a badge of honor. Like "we're UT. We pay top dollar for our coaching staffs". Just strikes me as a little...well...insane.
UCLA got humiliated because they couldn't afford to pay Rick's buyout and they're trying to save faceUCLA posters on Bruinzone say that Calipari and Barnes should pay them a commission for getting them raises
UCLA Basketball Forum
Lawdy, UCLA needs to pay someone 6 mil to develop them a web forum. That was hard to read. Makes me appreciate Freak all the more.....UCLA got humiliated because they couldn't afford to pay Rick's buyout and they're trying to save faceUCLA posters on Bruinzone say that Calipari and Barnes should pay them a commission for getting them raises
UCLA Basketball Forum
Awesome? I get your meaning, but I have to shake my head when people rejoice because we're spending even more money for a coach. I guess since fans don't receive a bill directly for his services it's lost the impact. When fans see seat prices go up, concessions go up, parking go up, etc, I hope they don't whine about it. Rejoice that we've now got to spend 4.7 million for a guy to coach a bunch of kids to play basketball. My word. It's akin to paying taxes. The fact that we don't have to write a check at the end of the year but instead the govt takes a bite every paycheck makes it something most folks ignore. They rejoice when they get a refund thinking it's free money from the govt. Pay that bill at the end of the year or better yet, in Nov right before elections and they'd damned well feel differently. Sorry for the rant. Again, not a slam on you. Just crazy that we wear spending that much money for a coach as something like a badge of honor. Like "we're UT. We pay top dollar for our coaching staffs". Just strikes me as a little...well...insane.
There you go. You just answered your own question. We could have let him walk and start over, or we could invest heavily and show our commitment to basketball, not only to Rick Barnes and his staff, but to whoever his replacement will be in the next decade. We also ensured ourselves that his salary likely won’t need to be radically renegotiated going forward thru retirement. He basically just capped himself, so the only potential negotiation should revolve around number of years on his deal, which as long as he is winning, should stay in the 4-5 year range.Again, I guess it's just the notion that fans are happy about having to spend MORE money for a something. We really had no choice but to make an offer he could not refuse otherwise we risk losing all the positivity surrounding what we've accomplished over the last 2 years. It did give us stability...I hope...and instills confidence on the recruiting front that he's going to remain a Vol until retirement...again...I hope.
Really hope it turns out to be a worthy investment.
It just keeps getting more insane really, because you can bet the football coaches are watching this, and they know how much more they bring in than bball. Bama and LSU still have to hire their coaching replacements, so we could see more big money tossed around. A Jimbo contract will be the standard going forward for football coach hires.Awesome? I get your meaning, but I have to shake my head when people rejoice because we're spending even more money for a coach. I guess since fans don't receive a bill directly for his services it's lost the impact. When fans see seat prices go up, concessions go up, parking go up, etc, I hope they don't whine about it. Rejoice that we've now got to spend 4.7 million for a guy to coach a bunch of kids to play basketball. My word. It's akin to paying taxes. The fact that we don't have to write a check at the end of the year but instead the govt takes a bite every paycheck makes it something most folks ignore. They rejoice when they get a refund thinking it's free money from the govt. Pay that bill at the end of the year or better yet, in Nov right before elections and they'd damned well feel differently. Sorry for the rant. Again, not a slam on you. Just crazy that we wear spending that much money for a coach as something like a badge of honor. Like "we're UT. We pay top dollar for our coaching staffs". Just strikes me as a little...well...insane.
Awesome? I get your meaning, but I have to shake my head when people rejoice because we're spending even more money for a coach. I guess since fans don't receive a bill directly for his services it's lost the impact. When fans see seat prices go up, concessions go up, parking go up, etc, I hope they don't whine about it. Rejoice that we've now got to spend 4.7 million for a guy to coach a bunch of kids to play basketball. My word. It's akin to paying taxes. The fact that we don't have to write a check at the end of the year but instead the govt takes a bite every paycheck makes it something most folks ignore. They rejoice when they get a refund thinking it's free money from the govt. Pay that bill at the end of the year or better yet, in Nov right before elections and they'd damned well feel differently. Sorry for the rant. Again, not a slam on you. Just crazy that we wear spending that much money for a coach as something like a badge of honor. Like "we're UT. We pay top dollar for our coaching staffs". Just strikes me as a little...well...insane.
You can b!tch and moan all you want, but UT has lagged in coaches’ salaries in all sports ... until Fulmer stepped in.
In football, we are finally catching up in coordinator compensation. And, whether you agree with paying Barnes or not, we are making a statement about men’s basketball.
To be the best you have to attract top shelf coaches. You only do that by paying top shelf salaries. UT is finally making a statement that it is in it to win.
UCLA got humiliated because they couldn't afford to pay Rick's buyout and they're trying to save faceUCLA posters on Bruinzone say that Calipari and Barnes should pay them a commission for getting them raises
UCLA Basketball Forum