I would prefer a back-loaded schedule. Build confidence early, and then you can have a very special season if you steal the tough ones at the end.
Even if you start well on a front-loaded schedule, the pressure only builds to maintain your position as the season goes on.
I would prefer a back-loaded schedule. Build confidence early, and then you can have a very special season if you steal the tough ones at the end.
Even if you start well on a front-loaded schedule, the pressure only builds to maintain your position as the season goes on.
Kentucky has a back loaded schedule almost every year. Seems like they don't know what kind of team they have until late October every year. They even gave stoops a raise half way through last year and then he dropped 7 in a row (I think). Gotta be tough to be a cat fan and think you're good and find out you're not 1/2 way through the season.
Nah - they know they're not good before then.
Can't decide if I like our schedule set-up or not.
Stings when we play the heavy front loaded part but
leaves a good feeling in the off season as we roll through the back end.
I guess it's better to roll at the end before the longr off season.
Our offensive numbers have been decent all year.
That's not saying that Debord hasn't made mistakes on a calls but him "sucking" has been greatly over exaggerated.
But honestly OC's and DC's make easy targets.
...4th in the SEC vs the conference in total O only 6.4 ypg behind MSU for 3rd. They're 3rd in scoring O at 30.2 ppg, 2nd in rushing ypg, and 6th in passing O.
IMO, this is VERY good not only for the team's prospects for winning out but also recruiting.
UT could finish higher if they play well in these last 4 games. They need to roll Vandy like Houston did.
It is going to depend on Jones... I know... I default there. But hear me out. Some coaches are better with the unknowns of an early season than others. I think that was a key advantage for Spurrier vs Fulmer. Jones had a slow start to begin this season. He tipped us off with that bit about not really knowing your team until 3 or 4 games in. He'll have to be better than that to beat McElwain.
BUT.... there shouldn't be any problem knowing his team next year. It will be almost the same guys on O and many of the same on D.
It is going to depend on Jones... I know... I default there. But hear me out. Some coaches are better with the unknowns of an early season than others. I think that was a key advantage for Spurrier vs Fulmer. Jones had a slow start to begin this season. He tipped us off with that bit about not really knowing your team until 3 or 4 games in. He'll have to be better than that to beat McElwain.
BUT.... there shouldn't be any problem knowing his team next year. It will be almost the same guys on O and many of the same on D.
Every team complains about scheduling when they lose.
Worked out fine in 98. Even that year, though, Arky was an unexpected landmine in a heretofore soft part of the schedule.
Just play them one at a time.
I would prefer a back-loaded schedule. Build confidence early, and then you can have a very special season if you steal the tough ones at the end.
Even if you start well on a front-loaded schedule, the pressure only builds to maintain your position as the season goes on.