So you like Norvell, a guy who is WINNING with your other choice's recruits, over a guy who instantly got Purdue bowl-eligible in one season after 4 straight years of steaming garbage?
Give me a break.
My point with Saban was just that you CANNOT base everything about the potential of a coach on his first season. To me, it shows potential that he improved Purdue as much as he did in Year 1, not that he IS the next Saban. My point is that Saban still had to take his lumps regardless of how good he is/was in 2007 because of the state of the program.