Everybody knows that Tennessee spends more money on recruiting than anybody else. It is honestly not a big deal.
... or it wasn't when we were pulling Top 5 classes. The results need to catch up with the process (of spending hand over fist).
Location is a factor, but Vanderbilt is also located in Tennessee, has no athletic tradition to speak of, also had a losing record last year, likely spends a small fraction of UT's budget, and is at present well ahead of UT in the Rivals 2013 team rankings. I'd think UT should be able to swing classes in the 20s for much cheaper if that's the route they choose.
When adding cars, suits, jobs for girlfriends...bama beats us.
When adding payment to players, Clemson takes the crown.
Screw the negavol. This is a positive. You have to concentrate on your weakness. Our weakness has been a dearth of talent so to solve it, you have to go to the ends of the earth to get great players. You need a big budget when you have a lot less instate talent than your competitors. Way to go Dooley.