I never took the SAT, but from what I understand there are essays that are graded. Those are subjective. I think it is BS to have a 'perfect' score on anything that is subjective and that it is legitimate. That's why figure skating and gymnastics in the Olympics should be exhibition sports only. Bigger, faster, stronger. period.
/rant.
Oh, and no professionals.
/now I am done
No. I went back to school and finished with a 3.997 in my major and something right around 3 overall. Got a stellar LSAT score, letters from 3 federal judges and boom. Got into Memphis. I was wait listed by UT (only 2 schools I applied to) UT let me in a week before school started, but I had already signed a lease and moved to Memphis.
Well done CWV.
This change coupled with tons of people coming out of high school with inflated grades over 4.0 just doesn't make sense to me. I love how everyone cheers this using the reasoning that "people are not able to test well" which hurts them. I don't think I have really met someone who is actually above intelligent that "doesn't test well". Most seem to not test well because they don't know the information.
How do you decide to give scholarships, if everyone has the same GPA of 4.5 on a 4.0 scale? Essays? What about the good testers that don't write well.
Edit: I do like that they might eventually bust up the monopolies created by the testing organizations. The two tests are only given by those two organizations.
I didn't have the ACT score to get into BYU out of HS, but I transferred there and saw all these kids who had scored 30+ on the ACT struggle in intro to econ. ST's serve a purpose, but I would be surprised if it's the best method for achieving that purpose.
You normalize those grades. Divide the inflated GPA by whatever the ridiculous top number is and then multiply by 4. If students can get a 5 then the new number is the inflated GPA X 4/5. Maybe if high skools playing the stupid game realize the jig is up they'll go back to GPA norms.
The Valedictorian in my high school took the easiest path offered. It was controversial way back then.I used to think this way, but if two students graduate high school with straight As... Student A takes all general curriculum courses (no honors or AP) and Student B takes a significant number of higher level courses there should be a way to easily differentiate between the two and the weighted grades do just that.
I know tons.. smart people usually are high achievers unless they are bored
I used to think this way, but if two students graduate high school with straight As... Student A takes all general curriculum courses (no honors or AP) and Student B takes a significant number of higher level courses there should be a way to easily differentiate between the two and the weighted grades do just that.
No. I went back to school and finished with a 3.997 in my major and something right around 3 overall. Got a stellar LSAT score, letters from 3 federal judges and boom. Got into Memphis. I was wait listed by UT (only 2 schools I applied to) UT let me in a week before school started, but I had already signed a lease and moved to Memphis.
Which is a major reason we need to dump the "teach to the middle" routine in schools and group kids according to scholastic ability. We need the smarter kids challenging each other to complete with third world countries like India. Equality equals mediocrity when it comes to education.
I did something similar but with a better GPA. Quit in my Jr year at UT and enlisted in the Army (in 1967). Going back to school a few years later was a lot harder because it amounted to actually trying to do something rather than simply surviving a rite of passage.
..."Applications to the College set a new record this year, with 30,369 students from diverse backgrounds submitting applications.
The total represents a 20 percent increase over last years figure of 25,307, continuing a longstanding trend of growing interest in the distinctive intellectual environment that the College offers.
University leaders said the growth in undergraduate applications stems from continuing efforts to enhance student life and provide more avenues for students to pursue their academic and career goals...sic..
Admissions to the University of Chicago is highly selective. The middle 50% band of SAT scores for the undergraduate class of 2019, excluding the writing section, was 14501550,[157] the average MCAT score for entering students in the Pritzker School of Medicine in 2011 was 36,[158] and the median LSAT score for entering students in the Law School in 2015 was 171.[159] For the class of 2022, the College of the University of Chicago had an acceptance rate of 7.2%, the lowest in the college's history and among the lowest in the country.[160]
One problem with your approach is bored smart underachieving kids being relegated to classes that will never pique their interest or challenge them, and getting stuck there year after year.
Evidently, CWV may fall into that category. How would his life be different if he had been fully engaged in high school and college and been able to enter the law school of his choice. And, upon graduating, have a job at a high paying prestigious firm waiting on him. One thing I know, he wouldn't have time for the VN PF, that's for sure.
Thankyou for your service AM64.
Amen. Getting back into the rigor of the university mechanical engineering environment after being out for Vietnam then working while taking community college classes was a slap in the face for me. In high school I was more interested in who I was asking on a date than any class. I did my homework in study hall and played some kind pickup game or whatever afterward. Rarely did I take a book out of the school. I made Bs and As and that was all I cared about. I took the ACT as a junior and remember only that it wasn't bad, so I didn't try to improve it as a senior...but I scored high enough to get in to UT, that was all I cared about.
I would have done so much better in high school and college if I had somehow been emotionally engaged in at least 7-12 grades.
By the way, Chicago, one of America's most is not wanting for applicants. With a total undergrad enrollment of just under 7,000, there were OVER 30,000 applicant's for what freshman slots were available of that number.
So, no, this categorically IS NOT a "money thing" as some have suggested.
Really? You have evidence of this?
I had a 3.2 in high school and scored 33 on my ACT. I spent 4 years in college achieving a mighty 1.999 with 100+ credit hours that led nowhere. I believe that high scholastic achievement is a better indicator of continued success than a standardized test. I am downright gifted when it comes to standardized tests, but I am unmotivated unless I am engaged.
I used to think this way, but if two students graduate high school with straight As... Student A takes all general curriculum courses (no honors or AP) and Student B takes a significant number of higher level courses there should be a way to easily differentiate between the two and the weighted grades do just that.
The Valedictorian in my high school took the easiest path offered. It was controversial way back then.