BeardedVol
Not-Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2012
- Messages
- 13,589
- Likes
- 26,664
Lol one game?
Honestly BOT, one would think that by now you'd have at least learned to do a cursory internet search before posting.
SMH.
Ole miss went 5-5 by not caring about defenes, and Nick Saban is still playing defense in spite of the game being titled towards offense.Defense is irrelevant in college football now though. That’s what most say. So who cares how many yards a team gives up? Bama gave up almost 700 to Ole Miss last year.
Personally, I think it was strategic and a value assessment. For $7 or $8 million... maybe more... UT might have been able to bring in one of the handful of "big names" mentioned. They would have wanted guaranteed years and a HUGE buyout. And honestly, if Heupel's chance of succeeding and eventually competing in the top of the SEC is 20%... that big name gets you maybe 30% considering the starting point.Good post but your last line is the one that really matters.
Our coaching search was yet another example of how far we've fallen as a program. Heupel was literally the best we could get. Despite that, he's still a huge improvement over Pruitt.
If given the choice of ANY coach, I wouldn't have picked Heupel. If given the choice between Heupel and Pruitt, I'll pick Josh all day long. Thanks to Fulmer's buffoonery, those were essentially our 2 options and, once again, I'll be cautiously optimistic that we've finally hired someone at least marginally decent. 6-7 wins, actually scoring some points against Bama, UF, UGA and running a clean program is a huge step in the right direction at this point and I think Heupel can at least deliver that much.
The answer is he is wrong. I just went to look at the box scores from each game from UCF's website and came up with 337.15, which is far closer to the 344-346 the other two sites had in comparison to the 433.7 number that the NCAA came up with. My only guess they either don't count negative plays against the offense, or they do count yardage "gained" on penalty plays. Like throwing a 50 yard pass but getting called for holding, yet still counting the yardage.cfbstats.com - 2019 National Team Leaders
Someone is wrong. It isn't necessarily either of us.
ESPN seems to agree with my source:
2019 College Football Team Total Defense Stats | ESPN
Uncle Greazy.Lmao why yall mad im just telling yall what they be saying.
Just wanted to validate that Brandon was one of my favorite receivers. I trusted that he would catch the ball when thrown to him.Lmao Its a different vibe at UCF. Brandon is a captain and a starter.. UCF wr's are better and a top 5 QB. No need for yapping.
We just fired a “defensive guru”. Maybe it is time for some track meets. At least watching us won’t be like going to the dentist. Aren’t we all ready to have some fun watching Tn football? How long has that been? I remember bb teams from O’Neill that were brutal to watch. These last few football years have been miserable to watch. I propose having some fun and winning later.
UCF quarterback Quadry Jones discusses NIL, playing for Josh Heupel and Jeff Lebby.
Quadry Jones discusses NIL, playing for Josh Heupel and Jeff Lebby
That's not quite a fair statement based on 2020. It might be true but it isn't proven. In his 3 years at UCF, they allowed 434 ypg, 346 ypg, and 492 ypg. You could try to argue that he was making improvement then struggled in the Covid year. You could say that 492 is actually representative. But there isn't enough there to establish a trend.
A more important stat tends a little more favorable and supportive of the idea that last year was the anomaly. His scoring D stats over those three years were 22.7 ppg, 23.0 ppg, and 33.2 ppg.
My point is that you can spin it negative or spin it positive... or you can accept it for what it is, realize he will be the HC regardless, and hope for the best.
In 2018 Josh heupel’s defense gave up close to what UCF gave up under Scott frost’s final year…… in 2019…. That defense gave up less yards per game then Alabama….. 2020 is a throw out year due to covid….. it doesn’t seem like the UCF defense was that bad.Ole miss went 5-5 by not caring about defenes, and Nick Saban is still playing defense in spite of the game being titled towards offense.
That's what Alabama gave up each game.
Franklin was alleged to have wanted a $90 million, fully guaranteed contract. And you’d still have to put up with James Franklin, if you decided to pay it.Personally, I think it was strategic and a value assessment. For $7 or $8 million... maybe more... UT might have been able to bring in one of the handful of "big names" mentioned. They would have wanted guaranteed years and a HUGE buyout. And honestly, if Heupel's chance of succeeding and eventually competing in the top of the SEC is 20%... that big name gets you maybe 30% considering the starting point.
If Heupel works out, White looks brilliant. If he doesn't then Heupel is comparatively cheap to dump in 3 or 4 years when UT will be in a better position financially and probably program stability to make a run at a "name" coach.
Uncle Greazy.
I just want to say I understand WHY you resent Heupel. He recruited your nephew to transfer to UCF and sold him on putting up big stats and getting his name on a NFL radar by deciding to do that.
Only to leave...and not only leave, but to do to the school that he recruited Brandon away from. That's really tough man.
Brandon will have a similar year as he's had at UT. Malzahn is not a big passing game guy.
I'm sorry for Brandon.
Agreed. If the NCAA penalties are as manageable as rumored then that might be sooner rather than later.Franklin was alleged to have wanted a $90 million, fully guaranteed contract. And you’d still have to put up with James Franklin, if you decided to pay it.
I hate that it’s 23 years since our last SEC championship. But Kentucky had the horses to have beaten us 4 years in a row. We just lost 6 straight SEC games by 10+ points. We will be on probation. Fact is that we have to get firmly in the middle of the pack before a great coach will want the job. Jimbo Fisher jumped to an 8-4 program, not one with a losing record since 2007.
I’m no sunshine pumper but CJH may be a more mature version of Kiffin. And if so, he’ll be the best coach we’ve had since Fulmer. Start there.Agreed. If the NCAA penalties are as manageable as rumored then that might be sooner rather than later.
In the meantime, you take a chance with a guy with some things going for him. AD White knows Heupel so there's already a working rapport. Heupel is a high character guy unlikely to make your NCAA issues worse. He comes in preaching culture which hopefully means that if he must be replaced the next guy won't have to deal with those issues.
On the football side, he's supposedly one of the better O minds in CFB. At minimum, he's producing some pretty obscene stats which have only gotten better as he had more freedom to do what he wanted. The word coming from recruits and players is that they like and respect him and his staff. He seems to be on the front end of innovation when it comes to the portal. UT has lost players many likely due to the investigation. UT has been able to get what looks like quality players to replace them. Personally, I am surprised at how positive the "buzz" has been from recruits after visiting UT and the new staff. If not for the NCAA cloud, they might have shocked a lot of people in recruiting.
I'm a person who has learned through experience that good leadership and a positive culture where guys trust, believe in, and support one another is a powerful talent multiplier. I can't go into the throes of woe over the guys who are gone because I don't know what part they played in the toxic, corrupt culture that existed. I do know that I have fired guys who were among the most talented and experienced and even respected (by some) in my business largely for being a negative influence on culture. Every single time... the team got better. A lot better. People whose talent had been underestimated became leaders and great performers. So... I am neither optimistic or pessimistic. I am choosing to "HOPE".