FranklinVFL
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2008
- Messages
- 5,556
- Likes
- 9,481
Phil needs to be in his office doing his job as Athletic Director, not out at football practice every day. I'm sure there are other things that need attention other than football.
Many of you will disagree because football is king (it is), and have blinders on blocking out everything else. However some of us are alum that want UT to perform well in every sport with a competent administration to handle it.
I'm worried about the athletic department under Fulmer, and its why I didn't want him hired in the first place over a guy like Blackburn who loved UT but also knew administration and how to handle it.
Well, we have a small sample size right now, but we have seen:
Pros:
1. Hiring a proven winner as head FB coach
2. Expanding funds available for the FB staff and I believe additional analyst and off-field support positions
3. Getting Barnes a raise and wxtension
Cons:
1. Warwick extension
What else is there in the Pro/Con to support or deny his ability as AD?
