Tucker Carlson Obsession Thread (merged)

#2,376
#2,376
luthervol said:
My question was simple.
When you look at Trump, Tucker, and MTG laughing as the spectators chant "Let's go Brandon", do you feel more of a sense of pride or shame?
Click to expand...

When your woke, middle school library has pornographic books available for children to check out, do you feel a sense of pride or shame?
 
#2,377
#2,377
Vol737 said:
You must have missed it as I already stated my position. It’s a simple answer, neither. They were laughing at the moment. Big friggin deal. It was and still is meaningless. Do you have more of a sense of pride or shame when Obama said “never underestimate Joe’s ability to f*** things up!” I mean, if you want to get into minutiae and whataboutisms…. well, okay. To me, they’re both a big nothing burger, other than being pretty funny. This isn’t hard, Looth.
Click to expand...
I didn't miss it, already added your tally to the neither column.
I had more of sense of pride (since I'm more than willing to pick one) when Obama said that. Thought it was pretty funny.
 
#2,378
#2,378
VolStrom said:
When your woke, middle school library has pornographic books available for children to check out, do you feel a sense of pride or shame?
Click to expand...
I would view that as shameful. Luckily, it's not the case for any school library.
I also find the fact that you think it is the case shameful.
 
#2,379
#2,379
luthervol said:
I would view that as shameful. Luckily, it's not the case for any school library.
I also find the fact that you think it is the case shameful.
Click to expand...

Don't you ever see parents trying to read passages from the books to the school board and being shut down for it? I don't make things up dude.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franklin Pierce
#2,380
#2,380
 
#2,381
#2,381
VolStrom said:
Don't you ever see parents trying to read passages from the books to the school board and being shut down for it? I don't make things up dude.
Click to expand...
I haven't ever seen that, and I do not believe it is an issue. No more so than some people going nuts over the word "damn" being said in Gone With the Wind being an issue.
 
#2,382
#2,382
VolStrom said:
Here are some examples

Florida School Board Bars Dad From Reading ‘Pornography’ Book Allegedly Available To Kids

More Texas Parents Find Pornographic Books in Their Children’s School Libraries - Texas Scorecard

Concerned Parents Read Aloud from Pornographic Books at Indiana School Board Meeting

Parent Who Exposed Pornographic Library Books Sues After School Bans Him From Property - Washington Free Beacon
Click to expand...
I read all four articles. If a parent has a concern about a book, they should be allowed to voice that concern. That seems to have been the case in all 4 instances. Some of their concerns were idiotic and a couple of the concerns approached being legitimate.
 
#2,383
#2,383
utvolpj said:
I was referencing Tuckers integrity since he's held up as a standard around here.
Click to expand...
He is? The only 'standard' I see TC being held up as is the league leader in ratings. I don't see many people lauding him as anything other than what he is.. an entertainer.
 
#2,384
#2,384
luthervol said:
I read all four articles. If a parent has a concern about a book, they should be allowed to voice that concern. That seems to have been the case in all 4 instances. Some of their concerns were idiotic and a couple of the concerns approached being legitimate.
Click to expand...
So I was right, and you were wrong since you said this stuff never happens when you called me shameful?
 
#2,385
#2,385
VolStrom said:
So I was right, and you were wrong since you said this stuff never happens when you called me shameful?
Click to expand...
Not really. The term "pornographic" doesn't apply to any of the instances.
If you think it is truly even remotely a significant issue, you have been intentionally mislead.
 
#2,386
#2,386
luthervol said:
I didn't miss it, already added your tally to the neither column.
I had more of sense of pride (since I'm more than willing to pick one) when Obama said that. Thought it was pretty funny.
Click to expand...

Good. Then you understand my point.
 
#2,387
#2,387
WATCH: Joy Behar says she supports free college — but not for future Tucker Carlsons

The ladies of The View collectively expressed their support for forgiving all student debt on Tuesday, telling viewers that large amounts of debt are even following people all the way to their earthly demise.

"It goes with you to the grave," co-host Whoopi Goldberg said of the "crippling student debt."

Co-host Joy Behar, however, felt the government may need to take a more strategic approach.

"I think that we need to target it a little bit," she claimed. "I dont wanna subsidize somebody who's going to go to college, no debt, and then become a hedge funder or Steve Bannon or Tucker Carlson."

WATCH: Joy Behar says she supports free college — but not for future Tucker Carlsons
 
#2,389
#2,389
Vol737 said:
You must have missed it as I already stated my position. It’s a simple answer, neither. They were laughing at the moment. Big friggin deal. It was and still is meaningless. Do you have more of a sense of pride or shame when Obama said “never underestimate Joe’s ability to f*** things up!” I mean, if you want to get into minutiae and whataboutisms…. well, okay. To me, they’re both a big nothing burger, other than being pretty funny. This isn’t hard, Looth.
Click to expand...

He's taking it hard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol737
#2,392
#2,392
Franklin Pierce said:
WATCH: Joy Behar says she supports free college — but not for future Tucker Carlsons

The ladies of The View collectively expressed their support for forgiving all student debt on Tuesday, telling viewers that large amounts of debt are even following people all the way to their earthly demise.

"It goes with you to the grave," co-host Whoopi Goldberg said of the "crippling student debt."

Co-host Joy Behar, however, felt the government may need to take a more strategic approach.

"I think that we need to target it a little bit," she claimed. "I dont wanna subsidize somebody who's going to go to college, no debt, and then become a hedge funder or Steve Bannon or Tucker Carlson."

WATCH: Joy Behar says she supports free college — but not for future Tucker Carlsons
Click to expand...

Lol I missed this .. so the elite , privileged white liberal wants the government to pick and chose who gets help based on their ideology? I swear you democrats just can’t help yourselves when it comes to prejudice can you ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol, UT_Dutchman, StarRaider and 3 others
#2,393
#2,393
0nelilreb said:
Lol I missed this .. so the elite , privileged white liberal wants the government to pick and chose who gets help based on their ideology? I swear you democrats just can’t help yourselves when it comes to prejudice can you ?
Click to expand...

This is the mindset of what we are facing..No compromise whatsoever with these anti American fascists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, StarRaider and Franklin Pierce
#2,394
#2,394
Orangeburst said:
This is the mindset of what we are facing..No compromise whatsoever with these anti American fascists.
Click to expand...

That show has the dumbest cast of chicken heads I’ve ever seen . Their ignorance sometimes doesnt even seem believable . I love it when they cluck about “ the fringe “ or the “ right wingers “ then follow it up with statements like this one showing their desire for authoritarian control / intentional prejudice in our government towards certain groups .
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, StarRaider and Orangeburst
#2,395
#2,395
0nelilreb said:
That show has the dumbest cast of chicken heads I’ve ever seen . Their ignorance sometimes doesnt even seem believable . I love it when they cluck about “ the fringe “ or the “ right wingers “ then follow it up with statements like this one showing their desire for authoritarian control / intentional prejudice in our government towards certain groups .
Click to expand...

So mind numbing that they either believe what they say,,or just for ratings. Maybe the IRS will send a dozen auditors at each one off their princess lives.
****ing fat and ugly pigs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#2,397
#2,397
0nelilreb said:
Lol I missed this .. so the elite , privileged white liberal wants the government to pick and chose who gets help based on their ideology? I swear you democrats just can’t help yourselves when it comes to prejudice can you ?
Click to expand...

Is there any doubt if today's white libs were in Germany in the 1930's they'd just throw their own bodies in the ditches and use their hands to shovel dirt on themselves?
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider and 0nelilreb
#2,399
#2,399
NYC man accused of Threatening Fox News Anchors Avoids Prosecution — Twice

A New York City man who allegedly sent hundreds of online threats to three Fox News broadcasters and their families has been given a pass by federal prosecutors — twice, The Post has learned.

Jeffrey Rodriguez was arrested in 2021 and charged by the feds in a six-count complaint with cyberstalking and threatening interstate communications for the vile missives, in which he repeatedly said he would kill the anchors and called them “Nazis,” according to court records.

fox-news-threat-suspect-slide-feds-01.jpg

Rodriguez was arrested and given a six-count complaint with cyberstalking and threatening interstate communications in 2021.

Instead of seeking a trial or plea deal, Manhattan federal prosecutors inked a deferred prosecution agreement with Rodriguez in May, agreeing not to proceed with the case if he followed a number of rules for one year, including making no social media posts about anyone who works at the network. The agreement also requires him to participate in mental health treatment.

Rodriguez violated the terms earlier this month with a post on Instagram that tagged one of the victims in the case, Assistant US Attorney Madison Smyser wrote in a letter filed in the case Wednesday.

But rather than rip up the agreement, prosecutors agreed to let Rodriguez slide, requesting that Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses only “admonish” and warn him at a conference Thursday.

NYC man accused of threatening Fox News anchors avoids prosecution twice
 
#2,400
#2,400
Franklin Pierce said:
NYC man accused of Threatening Fox News Anchors Avoids Prosecution — Twice

A New York City man who allegedly sent hundreds of online threats to three Fox News broadcasters and their families has been given a pass by federal prosecutors — twice, The Post has learned.

Jeffrey Rodriguez was arrested in 2021 and charged by the feds in a six-count complaint with cyberstalking and threatening interstate communications for the vile missives, in which he repeatedly said he would kill the anchors and called them “Nazis,” according to court records.

fox-news-threat-suspect-slide-feds-01.jpg

Rodriguez was arrested and given a six-count complaint with cyberstalking and threatening interstate communications in 2021.

Instead of seeking a trial or plea deal, Manhattan federal prosecutors inked a deferred prosecution agreement with Rodriguez in May, agreeing not to proceed with the case if he followed a number of rules for one year, including making no social media posts about anyone who works at the network. The agreement also requires him to participate in mental health treatment.

Rodriguez violated the terms earlier this month with a post on Instagram that tagged one of the victims in the case, Assistant US Attorney Madison Smyser wrote in a letter filed in the case Wednesday.

But rather than rip up the agreement, prosecutors agreed to let Rodriguez slide, requesting that Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses only “admonish” and warn him at a conference Thursday.

NYC man accused of threatening Fox News anchors avoids prosecution twice
Click to expand...

These people never learn. You gotta be a psycho to threaten television personalities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top