TrumPutinGate

[Velo Vol]

Still waiting for the Mueller report.

 

[0nelilreb]

Still waiting for the Mueller report.

Are you holding your breath ? It’s been really quiet around here since Friday without yours and ELs twatter updates . I see your getting your courage back

 

[Franklin Pierce]

 

[volinbham]

Still waiting for the Mueller report.

5 days and no report. What are they hiding????????

 

[theFallGuy]

 

[hog88]

View attachment 199552

Oh is this another lie he told under oath?

 

[Velo Vol]

What is Barr hiding?

 

[BigOrangeD]

 

[hog88]

What is Barr hiding?

Your brain.

 

[volinbham]

What is Barr hiding?

At this point I hope the summary is all that ever comes out just to watch you lose your mind.

 

[volinbham]

View attachment 199552

Non-issue - Barr hasn't released the report on Dems timeline so that's all that matters...

 

[Velo Vol]

We're waiting.

 

[Velo Vol]

What makes Barr a "special, special person"?

 

[volinbham]

We're waiting.

and you'll keep waiting

 

[BigOrangeD]

What makes Barr a "special, special person"?

Sore loser.

 

[DC_Vol]

We're waiting.

What are you guys going to do when the TrumPutin narrative completely unravels?

Oh wait, I think now I understand.

 

[volinbham]

What makes Barr a "special, special person"?

I have to admit; I didn't think you'd take this so hard. On the other hand you were heavily invested in the narrative relying on your Twitter sources so I guess it makes sense. I hope you'll be able to make peace with this eventually.

 

[volfanhill]

So if I understand Mueller says no collusion. But maybe some obstruction depending on how you look at it. So if Trump obstructed he did so over something that is nonexistent?

 

[theFallGuy]

Non-issue - Barr hasn't released the report on Dems timeline so that's all that matters...

the Dems have some nerve setting "timelines" after the shytshow we just watched

 

[BigOrangeD]

the Dems have some nerve setting "timelines" after the shytshow we just watched

Nothing like tons of delays and redactions, right?

 

[volinbham]

So if I understand Mueller says no collusion. But maybe some obstruction depending on how you look at it. So if Trump obstructed he did so over something that is nonexistent?

Yes and no. It's possible he obstructed to prevent them from finding something else but yes the potential crime that was the charge of the SC turned out not to be a crime. Barr offered this as one reason he ultimately didn't see a case for obstruction; it's also the one that anti-Trumpers are fixated on (including Comey) while they ignore the others.

Firing Comey? Within his rights and RR letter and Horowitz findings provide ample legit reasons for firing.

Asking for slack on Flynn? Comey testified he never felt any pressure to comply, the issue was never pressed and it was never asked again.

Publicly questioning the investigation (Witch Hunt; SC full of angry Democrats)? Can the accused not suggest the investigation into them is BS?

Per the Barr memo; Mueller laid out these things (more I'm sure) and provided arguments both why they may merit obstruction charges and why the don't merit obstruction charges. IOW - these are events lacking evidence of intent to hinder the investigation.

 

[Velo Vol]

Trump makes these two contradictory statements minutes apart and the Fox audience doesn't even blink.

 

[volinbham]

Trump makes these two contradictory statements minutes apart and the Fox audience doesn't even blink.

whatever it takes to cope - we understand; we'll be here after you heal

 

[Velo Vol]

whatever it takes to cope - we understand; we'll be here after you heal

Are you going to defend the double standard or just try to be cute?

 

[volinbham]

Are you going to defend the double standard or just try to be cute?

that's the double standard you are bent about? of all the double standards that's the one? It's worse than I thought.

Okay, let's take your Tweet source - Daniel argues that Trump is "extremely inaccurate" with the concept that you can't investigate legally unless there is a crime. In effect Daniel is endorsing Trump's claim that it's perfectly fine to investigate Lynch because clearly a crime doesn't have to been committed to do a full investigation; maybe an SC is warranted.