TrumPutinGate

#25,852
#25,852
Mick said:
That has been referred elsewhere because it is not "at the heart of the investigation", but that is another good thing to come out of the investigation (cracking down on the FARA violators).
Click to expand...

I must have missed it . Because I believe they are just as dirty or sleepy as PM is . I was actually waiting for their names to pop up during the investigation into PM
 
#25,857
#25,857
0nelilreb said:
Trey is flash and cameras . Tom Fitton has a very able legal crew and just makes requests until he gets the info . 15 mins of fame vs filing law suites until the info comes out .
Click to expand...
Gowdy is a good prosecutor, and never lost a case. The Congress has no real power to prosecute anything. I wouldn't want him on my ass out in the real world.
 
#25,859
#25,859
DC_Vol said:
I like whataboutism. There’s nothing wrong with using the past to point out inconsistencies. People who complain about it are usually trying to run away from their lack of standards.
Click to expand...
More times than not, around here, it's a deflection where similarities is negligible. The similarities between what he perceives is going to be future behavior and the living example I provided were striking. Wouldn't you agree?

GTG, later redneck. 😀
 
#25,860
#25,860
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s office is formally denying Roger Stone’s claims that journalists got early access to his indictment last month, allowing CNN to film the GOP operative’s arrest.

In a court filing Friday, Mueller prosecutors said Stone’s sealed indictment was ordered to be automatically unsealed upon Stone’s arrest on charges of lying to congressional investigators and intimidating a witness. In accordance with that order, Mueller’s office notified reporters of the indictment and posted it on the office’s website shortly after the FBI raided Stone’s South Florida home and took him into custody just after 6 a.m. on Jan. 25, prosecutors said.

Mueller rebuffs Roger Stone’s claims that feds tipped off CNN
 
#25,861
#25,861
Mick said:
More times than not, around here, it's a deflection where similarities is negligible. The similarities between what he perceives is going to be future behavior and the living example I provided were striking. Wouldn't you agree?

GTG, later redneck. 😀
Click to expand...

I don’t know. I didn’t actually read your previous posts.
 
#25,864
#25,864
Orange_Vol1321 said:
It's a smear campaign. They want to drag it out till 2020 election.
Click to expand...
On this we actually agree. Muller report will have nothing actionable. It will have lots of shady ****. That will result in kicking and screaming into Trumps re-election. The House has already implied that they won’t see his taxes, which is a exercise in dumb assery, until after the next election. It will be paint him as dirty as possible with zero real proof. Now they will have a lot of those around him ****ed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeTrain
#25,865
#25,865
Mick said:
That has been referred elsewhere because it is not "at the heart of the investigation", but that is another good thing to come out of the investigation (cracking down on the FARA violators).
Click to expand...

I'm cool with this if they are going after all FARA violators. Hard to imagine they are only people connected to Trump. (see Podesta)
 
  • Like
Reactions: DC_Vol and 0nelilreb
#25,866
#25,866
Mick said:
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s office is formally denying Roger Stone’s claims that journalists got early access to his indictment last month, allowing CNN to film the GOP operative’s arrest.

In a court filing Friday, Mueller prosecutors said Stone’s sealed indictment was ordered to be automatically unsealed upon Stone’s arrest on charges of lying to congressional investigators and intimidating a witness. In accordance with that order, Mueller’s office notified reporters of the indictment and posted it on the office’s website shortly after the FBI raided Stone’s South Florida home and took him into custody just after 6 a.m. on Jan. 25, prosecutors said.

Mueller rebuffs Roger Stone’s claims that feds tipped off CNN
Click to expand...

So we believe this Mueller statement but the one about the Buzzfeed reporting was wrong?

If the BF Mueller statement was full of vagueness then so too is this statement

“The Special Counsel’s Office is aware of no information indicating that reporters were given any advance knowledge of a possible indictment from the Special Counsel’s Office,” prosecutors wrote in a footnote to their Friday filing.

IOW - we're not "aware" of a leak
 
  • Like
Reactions: DC_Vol
#25,874
#25,874
Mick said:
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s office is formally denying Roger Stone’s claims that journalists got early access to his indictment last month, allowing CNN to film the GOP operative’s arrest.

In a court filing Friday, Mueller prosecutors said Stone’s sealed indictment was ordered to be automatically unsealed upon Stone’s arrest on charges of lying to congressional investigators and intimidating a witness. In accordance with that order, Mueller’s office notified reporters of the indictment and posted it on the office’s website shortly after the FBI raided Stone’s South Florida home and took him into custody just after 6 a.m. on Jan. 25, prosecutors said.

Mueller rebuffs Roger Stone’s claims that feds tipped off CNN
Click to expand...
Yea, Smollet said the attack was real. I can say I have a billion in gold bars.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top