TrumPutinGate

#25,276
#25,276
lawgator1 said:
Huh?

I've said here at least ten times that no collusion may ultimately be proven. That's always been a possible conclusion.

Do I think that likely? No.

Do I think it likely there is a smoking gun proof of Trump personally colluding? No.

Do I think the evidence will nonetheless be convincing that he did? Yes.

Do I think the 35% will accept it? No.
Click to expand...

Mueller says that Trump actually designed some of the memes himself.
 
#25,278
#25,278
AshG said:
Maybe homophobic isn't the right word, but it was the only word I could think of at the time for someone who uses insinuation of homosexual behavior or status as a method of insult or exertion of power or place over another. Specifically, I was referring to AirVol in this post and volfanjustin in this post. Socially inappropriate behavior that, because the majority agrees with their views, is glossed over.
Click to expand...

Does it trigger you? If I call you a mofo, does that mean you are one? Damn, some of you need to go to sensitivity training.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01
#25,279
#25,279
AirVol said:
Does it trigger you? If I call you a mofo, does that mean you are one? Damn, some of you need to go to sensitivity training.
Click to expand...

Some of us believe that people can be better. It didn't trigger me, but it's not something I consider conservative behavior.
 
#25,281
#25,281
AshG said:
Some of us believe that people can be better. It didn't trigger me, but it's not something I consider conservative behavior.
Click to expand...

I'm sure he'd be the first to send "thoughts and prayers" out of one side of his mouth and be homophobic out of the other, so at least in that regard - I'd say he's very much a "conservative."
 
#25,283
#25,283
sk021419dAPR20190213104508.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolStrom
#25,289
#25,289
lawgator1 said:
Huh?

I've said here at least ten times that no collusion may ultimately be proven. That's always been a possible conclusion.

Do I think that likely? No.

Do I think it likely there is a smoking gun proof of Trump personally colluding? No.

Do I think the evidence will nonetheless be convincing that he did? Yes.

Do I think the 35% will accept it? No.
Click to expand...

Did you actually read that after you posted it ? You don’t think there will be proof that Trump did this ( smoking gun ) then you go on to say you don’t believe 35% will believe the evidence that can’t prove he did anything . 🤨

WTH? ... seriously .
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01
#25,290
#25,290
0nelilreb said:
Did you actually read that after you posted it ? You don’t think there will be proof that Trump did this ( smoking gun ) then you go on to say you don’t believe 35% will believe the evidence that can’t prove he did anything . 🤨

WTH? ... seriously .
Click to expand...


I said I do not think there will be a smoking gun of his role in collusion, but there will be very strong circumstantial evidence of it.

For example, while there may be an email chain discussing collusion, maybe Donald himself will not be on it. The question will arise, is there any way that whoever is on the email chain could have engaged in whatever deal-making was going on without telling Trump, i.e. Don or Kush?

Trump supporters will insist that absent him being on an email, that means no repercussions to him. Trump opponents, like myself, will want to delve deeper into that and will question whether it all went on without him knowing about it.
 
#25,291
#25,291
lawgator1 said:
I said I do not think there will be a smoking gun of his role in collusion, but there will be very strong circumstantial evidence of it.

For example, while there may be an email chain discussing collusion, maybe Donald himself will not be on it. The question will arise, is there any way that whoever is on the email chain could have engaged in whatever deal-making was going on without telling Trump, i.e. Don or Kush?

Trump supporters will insist that absent him being on an email, that means no repercussions to him. Trump opponents, like myself, will want to delve deeper into that and will question whether it all went on without him knowing about it.
Click to expand...

No proof means no impeachment . That’s the way it should be regardless of “ feelings / or wants “ .
 
#25,292
#25,292
AshG said:
Maybe homophobic isn't the right word, but it was the only word I could think of at the time for someone who uses insinuation of homosexual behavior or status as a method of insult or exertion of power or place over another. Specifically, I was referring to AirVol in this post and volfanjustin in this post. Socially inappropriate behavior that, because the majority agrees with their views, is glossed over.
Click to expand...
Or it was just 2 people teasing each other. But that was my take.
 
#25,294
#25,294
NurseGoodVol said:
Or it was just 2 people teasing each other. But that was my take.
Click to expand...

You very well may be right. I have trouble with some social cues and tend to take things literally. If it weren't going to cost upwards of $10k, I'd considered being testing for ASD. It would explain so much about my inability to integrate.
 
#25,295
#25,295
AshG said:
You very well may be right. I have trouble with some social cues and tend to take things literally. If it weren't going to cost upwards of $10k, I'd considered being testing for ASD. It would explain so much about my inability to integrate.
Click to expand...
These guys have been on Volnation debating for years, it gets heated at times but they all have great humor and tease each other. Probably one of the great things about the PF.
It is and will always be the case that texting leaves out visual and auditory ques that we as humans use to assess any given statement. Unfortunately the days of meeting in person to debate any given issue is pretty much over.
But if you get invited to the waffle house, then trust me, it's serious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AshG
#25,296
#25,296
0nelilreb said:
No proof means no impeachment . That’s the way it should be regardless of “ feelings / or wants “ .
Click to expand...


That is certainly your perspective, when it is a Republican president. Clinton went down because of lying. Trump I am certain he has lied to investigators. We know he has lied to the American public literally thousands of times. Probably hundreds of times about significant things in this investigation.
 
#25,297
#25,297
lawgator1 said:
That is certainly your perspective, when it is a Republican president. Clinton went down because of lying. Trump I am certain he has lied to investigators. We know he has lied to the American public literally thousands of times. Probably hundreds of times about significant things in this investigation.
Click to expand...

When did Trump talk to investigators?
 
#25,299
#25,299
AshG said:
You very well may be right. I have trouble with some social cues and tend to take things literally. If it weren't going to cost upwards of $10k, I'd considered being testing for ASD. It would explain so much about my inability to integrate.
Click to expand...
What is ASD?
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top