TrumPutinGate

[DC_Vol]

Homophobic people have a higher chance of being gay, according to science

I guess there are a few of you who just need to come out and admit how you live, instead of hiding it behind sideways comments towards people with viewpoints you don't agree with.

I’d like for you to tell me who here is homophobic.

 

[Stew Cook]

I’d like for you to tell me who here is homophobic.

Those with their curiosity on display?

 

[1972 Grad]

I’d like for you to tell me who here is homophobic.

I don't know about you, but I'm scared to death of them. If I dropped a bar of soap in a locker room shower, I ain't picking it up.

 

[DC_Vol]

Those with their curiosity on display?

I want names and examples.

 

[DC_Vol]

I don't know about you, but I'm scared to death of them. If I dropped a bar of soap in a locker room shower, I ain't picking it up.

 

[BigOrangeD]

Trump would surely pardon El Chapo if the price were right. Can launder it through stays at the Trump hotel in Washington.

I since some butthurt here. One word LG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Boomerang.

 

[AshG]

I’d like for you to tell me who here is homophobic.

Maybe homophobic isn't the right word, but it was the only word I could think of at the time for someone who uses insinuation of homosexual behavior or status as a method of insult or exertion of power or place over another. Specifically, I was referring to AirVol in this post and volfanjustin in this post. Socially inappropriate behavior that, because the majority agrees with their views, is glossed over.

 

[BigOrangeD]

I think Manafort just screwed himself on the pardon front. He makes for a good scapegoat at this point by his own actions.

Manafort was a plant into the Trump campaign. Trump will not pardon someone that betrayed him.

 

[C-south]

He may never pardon Manafort. With Trump loyalty only works one way. He doesn't give a flying **** about anyone under him.

So Barry has a thing for treasonous trannies?

 

[BigOrangeD]

Why didn't the the Russians meet with Hillary's campaign?

They owned her just like the Chinese owned her. More to come. Stay tuned.

 

[Matt2496]

Left wingers better be prepared.

You may be disappointed by the Mueller report

 

[DC_Vol]

Maybe homophobic isn't the right word, but it was the only word I could think of at the time for someone who uses insinuation of homosexual behavior or status as a method of insult or exertion of power or place over another. Specifically, I was referring to AirVol in this post and volfanjustin in this post. Socially inappropriate behavior that, because the majority agrees with their views, is glossed over.

Ahhh...so you’re working on smearing people for some light hearted fun. Gotcha.

 

[AshG]

Ahhh...so you’re working on smearing people for some light hearted fun. Gotcha.

Identification of behavior is smearing?

Edit: yep, I see where I did that.

 

[DC_Vol]

Identification of behavior is smearing?

Edit: yep, I see where I did that.

Labeling someone as homophobic?

 

[Matt2496]

Left wingers better be prepared.

You may be disappointed by the Mueller report

BTW, this isn't Fox reporting this.

 

[AshG]

Labeling someone as homophobic?

Give me a single word for someone who uses insinuation of homosexual behavior or status as a method of insult or exertion of power or place over another, and I'll gladly change the word I used.

 

[DC_Vol]

Give me a single word for someone who uses insinuation of homosexual behavior or status as a method of insult or exertion of power or place over another, and I'll gladly change the word I used.

Septic would definitely hold one.

We still like him though.

 

[AshG]

BTW, this isn't Fox reporting this.

So long as it's clear that the letter of the law was followed and the results of the investigation are trustworthy, I'm fine not knowing all of the information. I'll even be fine if it proves that nothing happened. I'm just a process wonk.

 

[lawgator1]

Left wingers better be prepared.

You may be disappointed by the Mueller report

Entirely possible. And we will have to endure a tidal wave of bragging and chin-strutting by Trump.

And that will fade and the country's overall revulsion at the guy will once again take over and he will be out on his fat arse in 2 years.

 

[DC_Vol]

Entirely possible. And we will have to endure a tidal wave of bragging and chin-strutting by Trump.

And that will fade and the country's overall revulsion at the guy will once again take over and he will be out on his fat arse in 2 years.

 

[Matt2496]

Entirely possible. And we will have to endure a tidal wave of bragging and chin-strutting by Trump.

And that will fade and the country's overall revulsion at the guy will once again take over and he will be out on his fat arse in 2 years.

You've repeatedly insinuated that Trump must be in the back pocket of Putin. Now you're recognizing that the Mueller report ending up a letdown is "entirely possible"?

Flip flop much?

 

[Mick]

Left wingers better be prepared.

You may be disappointed by the Mueller report

while the attorney general is required to notify Congress about Mueller's findings, the rules say those reports must amount to "brief notifications, with an outline of the actions and the reasons for them."

"At the conclusion of the Special Counsel's work, he or she shall provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel."

That's the way it should be, Especially involving counterintelligence.

 

[volfanjustin]

Left wingers better be prepared.

You may be disappointed by the Mueller report

Same left wing morons who were getting the base all fired up and making them believe this lie have recently started putting out stories that there may not be any collusion. Fun to watch the back peddling

 

[lawgator1]

You've repeatedly insinuated that Trump must be in the back pocket of Putin. Now you're recognizing that the Mueller report ending up a letdown is "entirely possible"?

Flip flop much?

Huh?

I've said here at least ten times that no collusion may ultimately be proven. That's always been a possible conclusion.

Do I think that likely? No.

Do I think it likely there is a smoking gun proof of Trump personally colluding? No.

Do I think the evidence will nonetheless be convincing that he did? Yes.

Do I think the 35% will accept it? No.

 

[Matt2496]

Huh?

I've said here at least ten times that no collusion may ultimately be proven. That's always been a possible conclusion.

Do I think that likely? No.

Do I think it likely there is a smoking gun proof of Trump personally colluding? No.

Do I think the evidence will nonetheless be convincing that he did? Yes.

Do I think the 35% will accept it? No.

Lulz