TrumPutinGate

The POS Democrat Mueller did that. He had to try and help them out of their hole of buzzfeed and the Covington boys somehow.

Mueller ordered the raid on Stone? Wow, he must have some serious clout to not work there and still have that reach.
 


How did they not notice the CNN reporter in the back drop filming the whole thing?

Hint: CNN and the FBI were colluding with each other.

Do we live in KGB Russia or the US? I honestly can't tell anymore.

29 agents( assault team) 17 vehicles, helicopter and boat and then they knock on the door, he was so dangerous they let him open the door and he turns around to be cuffed. CNN showing up to capture it all. This is political theatre at its best.
 
Basically, if Democrats don't get the outcome they want, they will continue partisan theatrics and stomp their feet.

House Democrats gear up for showdown over Mueller report in key committee

While committee investigations could cause significant heartburn for Trump, lawmakers know they are somewhat limited in what they can do because they don't have the ability to conduct a criminal investigation as Mueller does. So they say access to his final report will be significant.

It's unclear what the special counsel's final report will look like. Barr has said he wants to be as transparent as possible under Justice Department regulations, but those regulations require only that a report explain the decisions to pursue or to decline prosecutions. Democrats have said they want much more information than that — and are prepared to fight to get it. Nadler has said repeatedly that he would subpoena Mueller for a report or require him to appear.

To that end, top Democrats in the House and Senate have been discussing ways to bolster their legal teams in anticipation of that battle. As part of their strategy, several Senate Democrats who met with Barr told him that if he didn't make a comprehensive report on Mueller's probe available to Congress, their House colleagues would consider subpoenaing Mueller's investigators, a person familiar with the matter said. The person spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity in order to discuss private conversations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dezul
I guess you saw where the senate democrats said they do not agree with that conclusion.

LOL this Mueller sideshow will come to an end soon, and Democrats will be scrambling to find the new Muh Trump narrative.

But not you, Luth. I know you’ll respect the findings - or lack thereof - from Mueller and will tip your hat to him for a job well done.
 
LOL this Mueller sideshow will come to an end soon, and Democrats will be scrambling to find the new Muh Trump narrative.

But not you, Luth. I know you’ll respect the findings - or lack thereof - from Mueller and will tip your hat to him for a job well done.

Yep, the differences are stark.

Mueller Team: "After two exhaustive years of investigations, we found no evidence of direct collusion with the President and Russians to tip the election in his favor."

House Democrats: "Well, we'll continue looking because you didn't look hard enough!"
 
Mueller ordered the raid on Stone? Wow, he must have some serious clout to not work there and still have that reach.
Well since you ignored what I said he tipped CNN off of the raid. And ofcourse he had the FBI pick him up. He is the one investigating right?
 
LOL this Mueller sideshow will come to an end soon, and Democrats will be scrambling to find the new Muh Trump narrative.

But not you, Luth. I know you’ll respect the findings - or lack thereof - from Mueller and will tip your hat to him for a job well done.
I certainly will. That in no way means that there is not something that Mueller was not charged to investigate that the SDNY or the House investigations or any of the other ongoing investigations might find.
In that one in a thousand chance that nothing criminal is found on Trump, then we will just be left with having an habitual liar and despicable amoral human as the worst POTUS in history.
 
I certainly will. That in no way means that there is not something that Mueller was not charged to investigate that the SDNY or the House investigations or any of the other ongoing investigations might find.
In that one in a thousand chance that nothing criminal is found on Trump, then we will just be left with having an habitual liar and despicable amoral human as the worst POTUS in history.

Was there a limited scope of the Mueller investigation? I don’t think so given the many directions he moved in.
 


How did they not notice the CNN reporter in the back drop filming the whole thing?

Hint: CNN and the FBI were colluding with each other.

Do we live in KGB Russia or the US? I honestly can't tell anymore.

So you don't think it should be ok for the anti-Trump to call the most anti-Trump network to make sure they are there for the raid or losers of an election to go after their political enemies simply because they are soft,weak and can't handle losing?
 
Was there a limited scope of the Mueller investigation? I don’t think so given the many directions he moved in.
He had a fairly wide scope. He may have referred a couple of things to other jurisdictions for reasons I don't fully understand. The house may look at a couple of angles Mueller felt were beyond his charge.
Who knows? I think Trump's guilty of something that I would view as impeachable and certainly hope that somebody finds and proves it. If not....que sera sera.
 
You might want to re-watch that video and listen to what your handlers are telling you..
I'm good. There are witnesses that haven't testified. Seems pretty cut and dried that it is an incomplete investigation and premature conclusion.
 
So you don't think it should be ok for the anti-Trump to call the most anti-Trump network to make sure they are there for the raid or losers of an election to go after their political enemies simply because they are soft,weak and can't handle losing?
How did CNN being there for the raid impact anything? Much ado about nothing.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top