TrumPutinGate

[Hunerwadel]

Not when trying to impeach a president .. you better have more than a washed up lawyer that couldn’t buy another client after exposing that he likes to record them and his “ code words “ . To say he has credibility problems is an understatement of epic proportions . I’ll go ahead a get in front of your response here “ Trump , credibility problems , liar “ etc .... None of that matters because you have to have enough to convience the senate to impeach . A wink and a nod won’t get’er done .

He can be impeached if he broke the law even on a wink and a nod. I agree the Senate probably wouldn't do their part but at least the truth can be known.

 

[0nelilreb]

He can be impeached if he broke the law even on a wink and a nod. I agree the Senate probably wouldn't do their part but at least the truth can be known.

He can be impeached by the house , just like Clinton but if you don’t have both house to do your bidding with you’ll end up screwing yourself like the Rs did and get him re-elected .

 

[RockyTop85]

My whole point is the BASIS of Mueller’s appointment. The ruling just said Rosenstein hired him and he, or his replacement, can fire him. As we’ve discussed before the basis of that appointment is what I harp on. And this ruling didn’t address that. It just reinforces he answers to the Executive Branch appointing official.

Basically Mueller isn’t responsible for the validity of his appointment the appointing official is. And I agree with that. Now let’s get back to THAT original basis. It was the result of a flawed process as far as I’m concerned.

Oh on the comment that he answered to nobody so I’m pretty sure I haven’t made that statement. It gets back to WHO he answered to. If Sessions has to recuse then Rosenstein damn sure should have also.

No, those rants are not about you.

Questioning Rosenstein’s judgement is not intellectually dishonest.

 

[VolStrom]

No, those rants are not about you.

Questioning Rosenstein’s judgement is not intellectually dishonest.

Good double negative.

 

[Mick]

Good double negative.

Where are the double negatives?

 

[NorthDallas40]

No, those rants are not about you.

Questioning Rosenstein’s judgement is not intellectually dishonest.

Ok I think we’re in sync. Mueller derives his authority by his engagement letter from Rosenstein. And the breadth of that letter along with the background which formed its need to be generated is what I’ve always attacked.

Without rehashing the whole timeline I do not believe Rosenstein was honest in the actual generation of the public and classified engagement letters nor do I believe he had any business being involved in the first place due to his fingerprints being all over the FISA warrant process. This is a separate debate from the ruling that the court just provided.

 

[hog88]

He can be impeached if he broke the law even on a wink and a nod. I agree the Senate probably wouldn't do their part but at least the truth can be known.

You mean after 2+ years we might actually know teh truth?

 

[VolStrom]

Where are the double negatives?

not intellectually dishonest

 

[Hunerwadel]

He can be impeached by the house , just like Clinton but if you don’t have both house to do your bidding with you’ll end up screwing yourself like the Rs did and get him re-elected .

If he committed an impeachable offense I would like to see the House do their job whether the Senate does or not.

 

[0nelilreb]

If he committed an impeachable offense I would like to see the House do their job whether the Senate does or not.

“ If” he did then just prove it , and you will .

 

[VolStrom]

If he committed an impeachable offense I would like to see the House do their job whether the Senate does or not.

You better hope that they don't find anything. If they do it will be goodbye 401k for about 5 years.

 

[RockyTop85]

not intellectually dishonest

In my mind, “intellectually dishonest” being a colloquialism kept it from being a faux pas, but that’s probably not correct.

 

[Mick]

You better hope that they don't find anything. If they do it will be goodbye 401k for about 5 years.

Most economist expect a recession before 2021.

 

[luthervol]

So then ..” when do a liar tell the truth , when it’s in their best interest “ isn’t always the case , correct ?

You can amend it to "when they realize it's in their best interest." I assumed the "realize" was implied.

 

[0nelilreb]

Most economist expect a recession before 2021.

I hope those are the same ones that expected a collapse when Trump took office .

 

[0nelilreb]

You can amend it to "when they realize it's in their best interest." I assumed the "realize" was implied.

I saw you that put it in there . Wordmaster masterworder. Doesn’t change the fact that we all know liars don’t always tell the truth or that you skipped the Trump part of my post .

 

[luthervol]

You mean after 2+ years we might actually know teh truth?

that's actually pretty fast and efficient.

 

[Mick]

I hope those are the same ones that expected a collapse when Trump took office .

Now who were they? I don't remember such predictions.

 

[luthervol]

“ If” he did then just prove it , and you will .

That's what this whole process is all about.

 

[Vol8188]

Most economist expect a recession before 2021.

If they keeping bumping up interest rates I’m certain we will have one

 

[Septic]

They were screeching impeachment before he took the oath of office because it was Hillary’s turn. Bunch of damn sore losers. Get over it, you’ll still wake up tomorrow and put on your pants just like everyone else.

 

[UT_VOLS13]

Weak coming from you, not impressed.

 

[NorthDallas40]

In my mind, “intellectually dishonest” being a colloquialism kept it from being a faux pas, but that’s probably not correct.

I got what you were saying or thought I did. Nothing wrong with questioning the basis of Rod’s formulation of the engagement letter.

 

[hog88]

If they keeping bumping up interest rates I’m certain we will have one

Yep, they were kept artificially low for way to long.

 

[UT_VOLS13]

Yep, they were kept artificially low for way to long.

Yep and QE 100+