TrumPutinGate

That was probably in the 30K emails that got bleach bit on Clinton’s server.
Sounds like we need a 14th e-mail investigation.
Now are you guys thinking that if an investigation finds no actionable wrongdoing that that should be the end of it?
 
Like what?

The FISA stuff is near the top of the list.

The whole McCabe story about planning to remove Trump from office is another.

A load of others where normal aversion to law enforcement abuses are excused because of the target.

As I said, the entire "ends justify the means" mentality so long as you support the ends flies in the face of principle but it gets continually not only justified here but actively celebrated. Frightening really.
 
Sounds like we need a 14th e-mail investigation.
Now are you guys thinking that if an investigation finds no actionable wrongdoing that that should be the end of it?
Can’t investigate something that was acid washed, bleach bitted, smashed with hammers, and burned.

All to protect emails about yoga and Chelsea’s wedding.
 
Wow, bombshell if true. Was she also responsible for the Skripal Poisonings?

I’m hearing reports from Twitter , Vox and Russian bots that she was the one that poured the liquid , was believed to be hot sauce . Apparently THEY say she keeps it in her pocket . PUTIN is believed to hold a news conference on it ...SOON.
 
I wasn't speaking for everyone, just me. Let me say it again for clarity:

This Dem will accept Mueller's findings as long as they release the full and unredacted report.
How about if the gang of 8 get the unredacted report? The most important aspect of Mueller's investigation is to prevent this in the future and congress needs the information to help write policy and laws.
 
Their desire not to offend Trump or his base is not a good enough reason to let him wreck the country in the meantime. The 25th Amendment was adopted in case we could not wait out the term of an unfit president, which is what we have now.

Trump must be ousted immediately.
Please go research the 25th amendment before posting this garbage because clearly you don't know what it is there for.
 
Sounds like we need a 14th e-mail investigation.
Now are you guys thinking that if an investigation finds no actionable wrongdoing that that should be the end of it?
There wasn't even one that was credible. We need one investigation in to the emails that isn't run by members of the FBI with a party affiliation.
 
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/21/politics/senate-trump-russia-david-geovanis-intl/index.html

London and Moscow (CNN)Senate investigators want to question a Moscow-based American businessman with longstanding ties to President Donald Trump after witnesses told them he could shed light on the President's commercial and personal activities in Russia dating back to the 1990s, multiple sources have told CNN.
The Senate Intelligence Committee, which is probing allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 elections, has been keen to speak with David Geovanis for several months, the sources say.
Geovanis helped organize a 1996 trip to Moscow by Trump, who was in the early stages of pursuing what would become a long-held goal of building a Trump Tower in the Russian capital, according to multiple media reports at the time.
Years later, Geovanis worked for the Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, whose ties to Trump's 2016 campaign chairman Paul Manafort have also been of interest to investigators.
 
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/21/politics/senate-trump-russia-david-geovanis-intl/index.html

London and Moscow (CNN)Senate investigators want to question a Moscow-based American businessman with longstanding ties to President Donald Trump after witnesses told them he could shed light on the President's commercial and personal activities in Russia dating back to the 1990s, multiple sources have told CNN.
The Senate Intelligence Committee, which is probing allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 elections, has been keen to speak with David Geovanis for several months, the sources say.
Geovanis helped organize a 1996 trip to Moscow by Trump, who was in the early stages of pursuing what would become a long-held goal of building a Trump Tower in the Russian capital, according to multiple media reports at the time.
Years later, Geovanis worked for the Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, whose ties to Trump's 2016 campaign chairman Paul Manafort have also been of interest to investigators.

Hot off the cnn presses , what was the answer they got when they asked him about it ? Where is he now ? Looks like it’s going to be one of those we won’t to talk to him but he has nothing to say things lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanjustin
There wasn't even one that was credible. We need one investigation in to the emails that isn't run by members of the FBI with a party affiliation.
lol.....So your answer is that if the investigation(s) do not reach the conclusions you believe justified, it is an issue with the investigation(s) and not an exoneration of the person being investigated?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hunerwadel
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/21/politics/senate-trump-russia-david-geovanis-intl/index.html

London and Moscow (CNN)Senate investigators want to question a Moscow-based American businessman with longstanding ties to President Donald Trump after witnesses told them he could shed light on the President's commercial and personal activities in Russia dating back to the 1990s, multiple sources have told CNN.
The Senate Intelligence Committee, which is probing allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 elections, has been keen to speak with David Geovanis for several months, the sources say.
Geovanis helped organize a 1996 trip to Moscow by Trump, who was in the early stages of pursuing what would become a long-held goal of building a Trump Tower in the Russian capital, according to multiple media reports at the time.
Years later, Geovanis worked for the Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, whose ties to Trump's 2016 campaign chairman Paul Manafort have also been of interest to investigators.
Name these sources please, thanks in advance
 
You can either believe the Senate wants to talk to him or not. But I'm sure it's imperative to your screeching that a source be named.
I have no doubt CNN makes stuff up and just attaches the unnamed sources to it to appeal to their radical viewers, all 10 of you.
 
I have no doubt CNN makes stuff up and just attaches the unnamed sources to it to appeal to their radical viewers, all 10 of you.

I don’t think CNN makes up stuff themselves (much) I think they broadcast/print whatever they are told without verifying.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top