TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

#9,353
#9,353
Obsessed said:
Please explain. But becarful Trump might have you audited like the fed did me for bad mouthing hillary and obama
Click to expand...




If the purpose of the Dems funding the dossier was to generate FISA warrants to try to get dirt on Trump and associates so as t influence the election, and this was all at the behest of Obama administration officials to help HRC win, why was the investigation into Trump not shouted from the rooftops?


The fact of it alone would have been crippling: Trump under DOJ investigation for connections to Russian spies" or some such headline.


The premise of your argument is completely contradicted by the fact that attention to this prior to the election, if any, was de minimus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#9,354
#9,354
lawgator1 said:
If the purpose of the Dems funding the dossier was to generate FISA warrants to try to get dirt on Trump and associates so as t influence the election, and this was all at the behest of Obama administration officials to help HRC win, why was the investigation into Trump not shouted from the rooftops?


The fact of it alone would have been crippling: Trump under DOJ investigation for connections to Russian spies" or some such headline.


The premise of your argument is completely contradicted by the fact that attention to this prior to the election, if any, was de minimus.
Click to expand...

Devils advocate.

Maybe it was to torpedo his presidency just in case he won.
 
#9,357
#9,357
Obsessed said:
Please explain. But becarful Trump might have you audited like the fed did me for bad mouthing hillary and obama
Click to expand...

This is the exact reason you are a considered a conspiracy nut. They don't know you much less have the Fed's audit you. More than likely your accounting abilities are lacking and it set off red flags for the IRS.
 
#9,358
#9,358
lawgator1 said:
If the purpose of the Dems funding the dossier was to generate FISA warrants to try to get dirt on Trump and associates so as t influence the election, and this was all at the behest of Obama administration officials to help HRC win, why was the investigation into Trump not shouted from the rooftops?


The fact of it alone would have been crippling: Trump under DOJ investigation for connections to Russian spies" or some such headline.


The premise of your argument is completely contradicted by the fact that attention to this prior to the election, if any, was de minimus.
Click to expand...

I forget which end of the pendulum we are now on?

are we on the FISA was the start of the investigation or was there a lot of previous investigation that went into things before the FISA.

because at one point the story was that the investigation started quietly not to influence the election. it was only after he won that the story changed.
 
#9,360
#9,360
Mick said:
This is the exact reason you are a considered a conspiracy nut. They don't know you much less have the Fed's audit you. More than likely your accounting abilities are lacking and it set off red flags for the IRS.
Click to expand...

Ahhh yes. I’m a nut because I was audited. Just a coincidence it happened when all the other conservatives were audited.

Obama weaponized the irs. Along with the cia/fbi/dhs etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9,363
#9,363
lawgator1 said:
If the purpose of the Dems funding the dossier was to generate FISA warrants to try to get dirt on Trump and associates so as t influence the election, and this was all at the behest of Obama administration officials to help HRC win, why was the investigation into Trump not shouted from the rooftops?


The fact of it alone would have been crippling: Trump under DOJ investigation for connections to Russian spies" or some such headline.


The premise of your argument is completely contradicted by the fact that attention to this prior to the election, if any, was de minimus.
Click to expand...

Really? Lulz
 
#9,364
#9,364
lawgator1 said:
If the purpose of the Dems funding the dossier was to generate FISA warrants to try to get dirt on Trump and associates so as t influence the election, and this was all at the behest of Obama administration officials to help HRC win, why was the investigation into Trump not shouted from the rooftops?


The fact of it alone would have been crippling: Trump under DOJ investigation for connections to Russian spies" or some such headline.


The premise of your argument is completely contradicted by the fact that attention to this prior to the election, if any, was de minimus.
Click to expand...

They never thought she could lose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9,367
#9,367
luthervol said:
That would also take away any motivation to "spy" on Trump in the first place.
Click to expand...

BS, looter.

The libs never thought she would lose, but they also saw the momentum Trump mustered through the primaries. It was a safety net, and you’re now seeing the repercussions.

But don’t let us interfere with your path to stupidity. You just continue marching the yellow brick road. You’re the scarecrow, right? You unequivocally struggle with functions that involve cerebral processing.

You have just over a month left, and if you’re wrong, which you will be, you will be e-ssaulted!

Tick tock!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9,368
#9,368
Squints said:
BS, looter.

The libs never thought she would lose, but they also saw the momentum Trump mustered through the primaries. It was a safety net, and you’re now seeing the repercussions.

But don’t let us interfere with your path to stupidity. You just continue marching the yellow brick road. You’re the scarecrow, right? You unequivocally struggle with functions that involve cerebral processing.

You have just over a month left, and if you’re wrong, which you will be, you will be e-ssaulted!

Tick tock!
Click to expand...

You guys don't get it.

It had to be both or neither.

Either they felt like Trump was a big enough threat to warrant a biased investigation in order to get him if need be....which means they would have made the investigations public or at least leaked them.

Or they didn't feel he was a enough of a threat to make the investigations public knowledge or even leak a word about them.....which means they didn't see him as a big enough threat to warrant biased and unnecessary investigations.

It's obviously not the first which means it must be the second.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9,369
#9,369
luthervol said:
You guys don't get it.

It had to be both or neither.

Either they felt like Trump was a big enough threat to warrant a biased investigation in order to get him if need be....which means they would have made the investigations public or at least leaked them.

Or they didn't feel he was a enough of a threat to make the investigations public knowledge or even leak a word about them.....which means they didn't see him as a big enough threat to warrant biased and unnecessary investigations.

It's obviously not the first which means it must be the second.
Click to expand...
My wife is down at the Cape. She said it's HOT!!! Of course, it's not cool here.
 
#9,370
#9,370
I seem to remember that the press reported that the government had spied on Trump during the election then denied it months later after everyone realized it was against the law.

Anyone remember the specifics?
 
Last edited:
#9,372
#9,372
luthervol said:
You guys don't get it.

It had to be both or neither.

Either they felt like Trump was a big enough threat to warrant a biased investigation in order to get him if need be....which means they would have made the investigations public or at least leaked them.

Or they didn't feel he was a enough of a threat to make the investigations public knowledge or even leak a word about them.....which means they didn't see him as a big enough threat to warrant biased and unnecessary investigations.

It's obviously not the first which means it must be the second.
Click to expand...

No, you don’t get it. Do you seriously believe they would leak that they were illegally spying on a candidate?

You can’t say, “why didn’t they leak anything?,” while believing the methods for acquiring the leaked info wouldn’t be determined. Now that it has all been brought to light, with the illegalities surrounding the FISA warrant and it’s subsequent use, I think our narrative is spot on.

Checkmate, doofer!
 
#9,374
#9,374
1972 Grad said:
My wife is down at the Cape. She said it's HOT!!! Of course, it's not cool here.
Click to expand...

We're going down next Wednesday and staying through the following Friday. Can't wait.

It's suffocating here. At least there I can get in the water.
 
#9,375
#9,375
Squints said:
No, you don’t get it. Do you seriously believe they would leak that they were illegally spying on a candidate?

You can’t say, “why didn’t they leak anything?,” while believing the methods for acquiring the leaked info wouldn’t be determined. Now that it has all been brought to light, with the illegalities surrounding the FISA warrant and it’s subsequent use, I think our narrative is spot on.

Checkmate, doofer!
Click to expand...

They had LEGAL ongoing investigations going against two key people in his campaign.

I think you must be playing checkers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top