TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

You asked an opinion question "do you think" and I told you what I thought about them. Then you asked for "proof" of my opinion. I'm fine with the oversight of their handling the clinton investigation just not from Nunes. Bias is the issue in both instances.

No, I asked the question to another poster if he thought they should be involved in the investigation of either party. You stated they hated politicians, which isn't an answer and then tried to divert the topic by bringing up Nunes which is completely not the same thing.
 
Let me ask you this. Do you honestly think either one of them should have been anywhere near a case involving Trump or Hillary?

I haven't followed these lovebirds closely enough to opine. Other than some stupid texts, have they been shown to have DONE anything improper.
 
You asked an opinion question "do you think" and I told you what I thought about them. Then you asked for "proof" of my opinion. I'm fine with the oversight of their handling the clinton investigation just not from Nunes. Bias is the issue in both instances.

Why hasn’t Nunes been kicked off the Cmte, or lost his Chairmanship if he’s so terrible and evil?
 
No, I asked the question to another poster if he thought they should be involved in the investigation of either party. You stated they hated politicians, which isn't an answer and then tried to divert the topic by bringing up Nunes which is completely not the same thing.

I never said you asked me the question. In actuality their biases have been dealt with and they are off both cases. You can't say the same thing about Nunes who was elected by what 60% of the voters in his district. You want to infer Schiff is bias but Nunes in not. Please.
 
I haven't followed these lovebirds closely enough to opine. Other than some stupid texts, have they been shown to have DONE anything improper.

Well, that's the $64,000 question.

Let me ask you this then. You're (allegedly) a lawyer. If you were the defense in this case, would you use these texts, regardless of additional information, to show bias against your client?

Be truthful for once.
 
Well, that's the $64,000 question.

Let me ask you this then. You're (allegedly) a lawyer. If you were the defense in this case, would you use these texts, regardless of additional information, to show bias against your client?

Be truthful for once.

What's the goal? To show that they're biased or that the investigation is biased? Certainly, you could use the bad texts to show that they are individually biased, but they've already been removed from the case. Mueller nipped that one in the bud. And I'm sure any substantive information they gathered/work they performed has been reexamined/re-vetted at this point. So this should not affect the validity of the investigation itself, especially when there's been ZERO showing of misconduct in the investigatory work that they did. Also, I don't think they were decisionmakers, we're they?
 
No its not. The issue is being bias and investigations. Nunes was on the transition team and has shown time and time again just how bias he is.

Child, you should expect a politician to be biased not an FBI agent.
 
Ryan says he agrees with Gowdy that FBI acted appropriately - CNNPolitics

House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr, both Republicans, broke with President Donald Trump on Wednesday over allegations spies infiltrated his 2016 campaign, saying they agree with GOP Rep. Trey Gowdy that the FBI did "exactly" what it should have done over its handling of a confidential source.

The declarations by the leading Republicans are the latest indications that Trump lacks any evidence to back up his claims of a major political scandal he calls "spygate" -- since those lawmakers were among a select group briefed on the classified intelligence at issue. The only Republican briefed on the intelligence who has yet to break from Trump is Rep. Devin Nunes, the House Intelligence chairman who has demanded more documents as part of his investigation.

:birgits_giggle:
 
Ryan says he agrees with Gowdy that FBI acted appropriately - CNNPolitics

House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr, both Republicans, broke with President Donald Trump on Wednesday over allegations spies infiltrated his 2016 campaign, saying they agree with GOP Rep. Trey Gowdy that the FBI did "exactly" what it should have done over its handling of a confidential source.

The declarations by the leading Republicans are the latest indications that Trump lacks any evidence to back up his claims of a major political scandal he calls "spygate" -- since those lawmakers were among a select group briefed on the classified intelligence at issue. The only Republican briefed on the intelligence who has yet to break from Trump is Rep. Devin Nunes, the House Intelligence chairman who has demanded more documents as part of his investigation.

:birgits_giggle:

Make sure you use all the crayons in the box please.:hi:

"I think Chairman Gowdy's initial assessment's accurate, I think, but we have some more digging to do. We're waiting for some more document requests," Ryan told reporters at a news conference on Capitol Hill. "It would have been helpful if we got this information earlier.
 
Ryan says he agrees with Gowdy that FBI acted appropriately - CNNPolitics

House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr, both Republicans, broke with President Donald Trump on Wednesday over allegations spies infiltrated his 2016 campaign, saying they agree with GOP Rep. Trey Gowdy that the FBI did "exactly" what it should have done over its handling of a confidential source.

The declarations by the leading Republicans are the latest indications that Trump lacks any evidence to back up his claims of a major political scandal he calls "spygate" -- since those lawmakers were among a select group briefed on the classified intelligence at issue. The only Republican briefed on the intelligence who has yet to break from Trump is Rep. Devin Nunes, the House Intelligence chairman who has demanded more documents as part of his investigation.

:birgits_giggle:

left out this quote

"I am even more convinced that the FBI did exactly what my fellow citizens would want them to do when they got the information they got, and that it has nothing to do with Donald Trump," Gowdy said in an interview on Fox News.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Make sure you use all the crayons in the box please.:hi:

"I think Chairman Gowdy's initial assessment's accurate, I think, but we have some more digging to do. We're waiting for some more document requests," Ryan told reporters at a news conference on Capitol Hill. "It would have been helpful if we got this information earlier.

Helpful how? They wouldn't have been running around screaming foul.
 
Sure thing. How did I mislead you by posting the first two paragraphs of the article?

How many times have you or LG posted about Gowdy's interview, several that I know of. How many times have you all posted where Gowdy said "at this time Trump is not the target of the investigation"? Fact is you all didn't watch the interview, you just copy/paste what you read and hear on CNN and I'm sure they fail to mention that part
 
How many times have you or LG posted about Gowdy's interview, several that I know of. How many times have you all posted where Gowdy said "at this time Trump is not the target of the investigation"? Fact is you all didn't watch the interview, you just copy/paste what you read and hear on CNN and I'm sure they fail to mention that part

Face it I didn't mislead you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
You didn't me because I know the rest of the interview, but you far left pals don't and clearly you don't either or are leaving it out on purpose

So, what's your point? Gowdy is saying two things: The FBI did exactly what they should be doing (which is contrary to what Trump says - big deep state conspiracy according to Trump), he also says that Trump is not the target of the investigation (also contrary to what Trump thinks).
 
U.S. House Speaker Paul Ryan said on Wednesday that President Donald Trump should not pardon himself, becoming the second Republican leader in Congress to balk at the president’s assertion that he had “absolute” power to do so.
 
ryan says he agrees with gowdy that fbi acted appropriately - cnnpolitics

house speaker paul ryan and senate intelligence chairman richard burr, both republicans, broke with president donald trump on wednesday over allegations spies infiltrated his 2016 campaign, saying they agree with gop rep. Trey gowdy that the fbi did "exactly" what it should have done over its handling of a confidential source.

The declarations by the leading republicans are the latest indications that trump lacks any evidence to back up his claims of a major political scandal he calls "spygate" -- since those lawmakers were among a select group briefed on the classified intelligence at issue. The only republican briefed on the intelligence who has yet to break from trump is rep. Devin nunes, the house intelligence chairman who has demanded more documents as part of his investigation.

:birgits_giggle:


[twitter]1004422978078167040[/twitter]
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Advertisement





Back
Top