TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

:lolabove: So it's the FBI"s responsibility to vet political hires, you think a "smart genius" would have done that. :birgits_giggle:

Not what I said. The FBI is privy to information that simple vetting could not uncover. As Trump was running for President, they easily could have, and should have, let him know that they were investigating Manafort. I would expect the same courtesy to have been given if it were a Democratic candidate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Sessions has seen enough of the evidence to know that he is the only thing standing between Trump's illegitimate and criminal presidency getting exposed versus Trump covering it up with personnel moves.


Trump may fire him to try to further the cover-up in a Nixonian move, but Sessions isn't going to make it easy for him. For one thing, he does not want the history books to imply that he might have been complicit in Trump's criminal enterprise.

LOL VolProf.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Sessions has seen enough of the evidence to know that he is the only thing standing between Trump's illegitimate and criminal presidency getting exposed versus Trump covering it up with personnel moves.


Trump may fire him to try to further the cover-up in a Nixonian move, but Sessions isn't going to make it easy for him. For one thing, he does not want the history books to imply that he might have been complicit in Trump's criminal enterprise.

Then wouldn’t the smart move be to step down and say it? If he really was wanting to save his own legacy? Seems dumb to keep working with the guy if that’s the case.
 
Sessions has seen enough of the evidence to know that he is the only thing standing between Trump's illegitimate and criminal presidency getting exposed versus Trump covering it up with personnel moves.


Trump may fire him to try to further the cover-up in a Nixonian move, but Sessions isn't going to make it easy for him. For one thing, he does not want the history books to imply that he might have been complicit in Trump's criminal enterprise.

Illegitimate presidency? How so?
 
"OCONUS LURES" = foreign spies ...in Dec 2015. WTF???

Breaking: Senate Releases Unredacted Strzok-Page Texts Showing FBI Initiated MULTIPLE SPIES in Trump Campaign in December 2015

The texts released today from corrupt FBI investigator Peter Strzok to corrupt FBI attorney Lisa Page state the following –

BOMBSHELL- From DECEMBER 2015–The word LURES is redacted by FBI but not OIG; OCONUS LURES; OCONUS= Outside Contiguous US LURES= In this context LURES = SPIES – multiple – Is this an admission that the FBI wanted to run a baited Sting Op using foreign agents against Trump?”


[twitter]1003673455496052736[/twitter]
 
"OCONUS LURES" = foreign spies ...in Dec 2015. WTF???

Breaking: Senate Releases Unredacted Strzok-Page Texts Showing FBI Initiated MULTIPLE SPIES in Trump Campaign in December 2015

The texts released today from corrupt FBI investigator Peter Strzok to corrupt FBI attorney Lisa Page state the following –

BOMBSHELL- From DECEMBER 2015–The word LURES is redacted by FBI but not OIG; OCONUS LURES; OCONUS= Outside Contiguous US LURES= In this context LURES = SPIES – multiple – Is this an admission that the FBI wanted to run a baited Sting Op using foreign agents against Trump?”


[twitter]1003673455496052736[/twitter]

I still got those beachfront lots available in Kansas. Just hit me up and I'll set you up in the lot next to the one I sold to this really old Argentinian guy with a funny German name. Think it was Adolf something or other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I still got those beachfront lots available in Kansas. Just hit me up and I'll set you up in the lot next to the one I sold to this really old Argentinian guy with a funny German name. Think it was Adolf something or other.
I don't think you are in Kansas anymore, Dorothy.
 
I still got those beachfront lots available in Kansas. Just hit me up and I'll set you up in the lot next to the one I sold to this really old Argentinian guy with a funny German name. Think it was Adolf something or other.

Do right and wrong change depending on what political parties are involved?
 
"OCONUS LURES" = foreign spies ...in Dec 2015. WTF???

Breaking: Senate Releases Unredacted Strzok-Page Texts Showing FBI Initiated MULTIPLE SPIES in Trump Campaign in December 2015

The texts released today from corrupt FBI investigator Peter Strzok to corrupt FBI attorney Lisa Page state the following –

BOMBSHELL- From DECEMBER 2015–The word LURES is redacted by FBI but not OIG; OCONUS LURES; OCONUS= Outside Contiguous US LURES= In this context LURES = SPIES – multiple – Is this an admission that the FBI wanted to run a baited Sting Op using foreign agents against Trump?”


[twitter]1003673455496052736[/twitter]

How do they know the text is about Trump? Is that the only thing they were working on?
 
Read those texts, then read the title of the article and let me know how you can infer anything from those texts that supports the conclusion/title of the article.

Let me ask you this. Do you honestly think either one of them should have been anywhere near a case involving Trump or Hillary?
 
Let me ask you this. Do you honestly think either one of them should have been anywhere near a case involving Trump or Hillary?

I think they both hate politicians. Do you think Nunes should have anything to do with the oversight of those investigations?
 
I think they both hate politicians. Do you think Nunes should have anything to do with the oversight of those investigations?

Nunes was elected and holds no police powers, completely different.
 
lol

Please show that proof.



Well now, that's the way this government works. Of course, the same could be asked about Schiff, though you won't ask that question.

I think you are incapable of giving a simple straight answer to a simple question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I think you are incapable of giving a simple straight answer to a simple question.

You really are full of irony this morning as you avoided the original question and follow up questions and are attempting to divert the topic.

Yes, Nunes can and should be involved in oversight since that happens to be his Congressional committee.

Just like Schiff.

However, neither of those two FBI Agents should be involved at any point with an investigation of Hillary or Trump. Period.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
You really are full of irony this morning as you avoided the original question and follow up questions and are attempting to divert the topic.

Yes, Nunes can and should be involved in oversight since that happens to be his Congressional committee.

Just like Schiff.

However, neither of those two FBI Agents should be involved at any point with an investigation of Hillary or Trump. Period.

You asked an opinion question "do you think" and I told you what I thought about them. Then you asked for "proof" of my opinion. I'm fine with the oversight of their handling the clinton investigation just not from Nunes. Bias is the issue in both instances.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Advertisement





Back
Top