Just what I thought. Nobody that is a self lubricating Trump anal probe will answer the question of what do you think the Trump Tower meeting was about.
cause its about the 15th time its been brought up, just like you ignoring Vol1235i1583's posts.
it was a twenty minute meeting, yes? If it was twenty minutes long it was nothing substantial. likely just some handshakes and introductions.
at worst, for Trump, it was *speaking into the hidden mic*"Hi my name is ***** Galore, I will be your Kremlin liaison for nefarious back room deals."
seriously twenty minutes is "oh crap, I didn't put money into the machine, here is some top secret document only for Trump's eyes, I have to go, bye." you have to consider that 20 minutes is a rolling clock from the moment she set foot in Trump Tower to when she left the front door. you don't get special permission from the US government to enter the country for a 20 minute meeting.
to play your game lets say it was everything you hope it to be. Trump Jr was handing over the nuclear codes, the keys to Fort Knox, the servers with proof of the hacking, and they got a letter stating the piss tape never comes out. How do you explain the two meetings with Fusion GPS? If one meeting in Trump Tower is enough for collusion, what do you call two with the people responsible for the dossier?
A twenty minute meeting about nothing. Were they pitching a Seinfeld sitcom in Russia?
I already played your game. It was everything you hoped, Jr was turning everything over and signing away the US Constitution to Putin to freely edit as he sees fit. which is probably why Trump wants to take our guns.
now answer mine. What about the two meetings with Fusion GPS the day before and day after? seems like at least twice the collusion.
Confirmed email the meeting was about dirt on Hillary.
How about you tell everybody who's source is correct. I bet you wont and will only have some smart assed response.
Ok I'll play along...Is Jr's apparent meeting with the intent to hear opposition research dirt illegal?
But wait, what about the HRC/DNC opposition research of the dossier by an foreign Brit sources, that used unverified Russian 'purveyors' to spread dirt?
I'm confused Mick, you can't have it one way.
Where's your outrage about the dossier, which is REAL foreign collusion to effect an election?
You're looking at this all wrong, this isn't a black and white issue. There is no one source that's universally acceptable to all factions as each will only accept the validity of sources that internally align with preconceived beliefs.
Some however are dumber than others. I'll let you know which one those are at a place and time of my choosing; right now you're on a need to know basis only.
Mueller has it all figured out and just waiting to inform you. He know it will be hard for you to swallow and will have to shove it down your throat with evidence.