Did you hear about the Dossier or any FISA warrants or any investigation into the Trump campaign before the election? Can't influence an election after the fact.
Its not surprising you are confused.
That's where you're wrong.
According to your reasoning this is a grey issue.
In that case it seems to me that no one knows the truth but yet you discount one source over the other. I don't care about your pieced together sources to make up your conspiracy timeline of events.
I do however wait on you and mick, lv and others to let everyone else know how the investigation is going because I personally get a good laugh out of it.
Trump will never be charged or impeached.
If Muller brought charges against Trump that were not related to the election or his Presidency there could be riots.
Trump will never be charged or impeached.
If Muller brought charges against Trump that were not related to the election or his Presidency there could be riots.
Did you hear about the Dossier or any FISA warrants or any investigation into the Trump campaign before the election? Can't influence an election after the fact.
Its not surprising you are confused.
Oh this is such a fail.This is the main Trump supporters response. We dont care that hes a cheater cause the women he bangs are good looking. Its the typical teenage response which is where the majority of his supporters are mentally. The party of god turns a blind eye as long as the girl is hot.
yeah I don't see it selling well.
Russians, russians hacking, russians collusion, Russian influence, Russian interference, Russian memes. and now we bring you up on charges from 10 years ago on a deal in the Caribbean.
you're looking at this all wrong, this isn't a black and white issue. There is no one source that's universally acceptable to all factions as each will only accept the validity of sources that internally align with preconceived beliefs.
Some however are dumber than others. I'll let you know which one those are at a place and time of my choosing; right now you're on a need to know basis only.
where was i wrong specifically? Are you suggesting there is a common source that will subscribe to and satisfy everyone's confirmation bias? I've not commented on the investigation at all or the "timeline of events" as you've erroneously stated. It would appear that assuming my belief that donald is a retarded toddler is bound to a belief that he is guilty of a crime.
I have no idea on the latter, the former is undeniable.

You may want to check your own confusion level.
In the third debate Clinton claimed Putin was backing Trump and that he was doing so because he (Putin) wanted a puppet. Wonder why Hillary would claim Putin was backing Trump?
On Oct 31 the NYT ran a story that the FBI had been investigating Russian interference and any connections to the Trump campaign. The article goes on to discuss how Clinton supporters pushed for these investigations.
So indeed allegations and information about the investigation (which was grounded substantially in the dossier) were out in public prior to the election.
It may be as simple as Trump instructing his subordinates to lie in an attempt to cover up the purpose of the hotel meeting.
did they lie? again, if Mueller only comes up with a crime because there was an investigation this was all a witch hunt. we have been told for years now that Trump is guilty, but what we are given is a "crime" dated after the election. witch. hunt.