TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

#4,227
#4,227
LouderVol said:
funny, the system only counts who you vote FOR. any thing else and you are just lying to yourself. also the same is equally true for Hillary so you aren't going to win any points.
Click to expand...

You missed the whole point of the original post, but that's okay.
 
#4,229
#4,229
hog88 said:
More time would mean at least 1 visit.

Ok Luther let's say you're right, it was the facebook memes and twitter bots that pushed Trump over the line in WI, MI and PA. What does that say about the intelligence level on the average Dem voter in those states? It was the usual Dem voters switching that won those states for Trump, not R voters.
Click to expand...

I would say that any "dem." voter in one of those states that voted for Trump made a horrible mistake and the reasons why would fall into a mix of 3 or 4 categories.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4,231
#4,231
volinbham said:
Webb would have won, Biden would have won.

Hillary was toxic and arrogant. She ignored the Midwest thinking it was firmly in pocket but the truth was the blue collar worker there was tired of being ignored. Trump at least spoke to their concerns; Hillary told them the government would "retrain" them for some other life.

Oh and Russia...
Click to expand...

How about the 16 repub. candidates Trump beat?
 
#4,232
#4,232
luthervol said:
How about the 16 repub. candidates Trump beat?
Click to expand...

What about them? A primary campaign is different than a general election campaign. Trump played to a frustrated base and the other candidates did the exact opposite. Remember the Rs don't have super-delegates to ensure the chosen one gets the nomination.
 
#4,233
#4,233
Sounds like a guilty Russian boogeyman to me...lol, everyone knows he's got nothing to hide.

Carter Page: I wanted 'illegitimate' FISA application released, memo seems to be 'next best thing' | TheHill

"I originally hoped that DOJ and the FBI would've released my illegitimate FISA application when I requested it last May, but it's been eight months since I submitted my Privacy Act/[Freedom of Information Act] request letters to them and I haven't received any of that information yet," he told Rolling Stone, using an acronym for the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
 
#4,234
#4,234
luthervol said:
You missed the whole point of the original post, but that's okay.
Click to expand...

no, you just don't understand how the system works. The reasons why one votes FOR someone is irrelevant. all that matters is if they do.

Nothing you have outlined changes the underlying fact that the DNC has no message. none, zero, zilch. the more you make it about Trump the more he wins. if you wanted to stop trump, come up with an easy to achieve low ball stance and you ride it to a 50 point electoral college win. Keep hating on Trump, deplorables, and so forth and you will lose again. simple as that.
 
#4,235
#4,235
Mick said:
You're doing a good job of showing the desperation and hatred of Hillary and the DNC. Are you looking for someone to defend their actions? Good luck with that.
Click to expand...

So the DNCs actions are indefensible... crickets. But you are outraged by by Ben Carson’s dining set today. I’ll never understand the thought process of a liberal.
 
#4,236
#4,236
Instead of blaming Russia for Trump:

Have you guys ever considered blaming the person who actually rigged the elections (primaries) and who told the media to give Trump extra coverage because she didn’t think she could beat anyone else?

That’s what’s most shocking. Is the lack of outrage directed at the dnc and Hillary
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4,237
#4,237
Vol8188 said:
Instead of blaming Russia for Trump:

Have you guys ever considered blaming the person who actually rigged the elections (primaries) and who told the media to give Trump extra coverage because she didn’t think she could beat anyone else?

That’s what’s most shocking. Is the lack of outrage directed at the dnc and Hillary
Click to expand...

They have no other play. They can't just say hey we ran a terrible candidate that got beat by a reality TV show guy, its just to embarrassing to admit that since they touted her as the most qualified candidate ever. They can save face by hitching their cart to Russia.
 
#4,238
#4,238
Vol8188 said:
Instead of blaming Russia for Trump:

Have you guys ever considered blaming the person who actually rigged the elections (primaries) and who told the media to give Trump extra coverage because she didn’t think she could beat anyone else?

That’s what’s most shocking. Is the lack of outrage directed at the dnc and Hillary
Click to expand...

These people are so far out of touch with reality that this doesn’t even compute w them
 
#4,239
#4,239
SLICKYINC said:
They have no other play. They can't just say hey we ran a terrible candidate that got beat by a reality TV show guy, its just to embarrassing to admit that since they touted her as the most qualified candidate ever. They can save face by hitching their cart to Russia.
Click to expand...

If they were willing to admit and accept how slimy Hillary is, the could save face by simply realizing she gave us trump.

But to do that, they’d have to admit just how corrupt both Hillary and the dnc are
 
#4,240
#4,240
LouderVol said:
no, you just don't understand how the system works. The reasons why one votes FOR someone is irrelevant. all that matters is if they do.

Nothing you have outlined changes the underlying fact that the DNC has no message. none, zero, zilch. the more you make it about Trump the more he wins. if you wanted to stop trump, come up with an easy to achieve low ball stance and you ride it to a 50 point electoral college win. Keep hating on Trump, deplorables, and so forth and you will lose again. simple as that.
Click to expand...

You forgot nada.

Of course I understand how the system works. One candidate will win and the others will lose. You can vote for the candidate you wish to win, against the one you wish to lose, for a third party as a statement vote, or not vote at all.

The dems. have a message, but evidently they need to summarize it in a 3 word childlike chant ("Build that wall" or "lock her up") or an idiotic 4 letter acronym (MAGA) in order for some to process it as a message.
 
#4,241
#4,241
Vol8188 said:
If they were willing to admit and accept how slimy Hillary is, the could save face by simply realizing she gave us trump.

But to do that, they’d have to admit just how corrupt both Hillary and the dnc are
Click to expand...

Exactly, they are not going to say the party they align with is corrupt.
 
#4,242
#4,242
luthervol said:
You forgot nada.

Of course I understand how the system works. One candidate will win and the others will lose. You can vote for the candidate you wish to win, against the one you wish to lose, for a third party as a statement vote, or not vote at all.

The dems. have a message, but evidently they need to summarize it in a 3 word childlike chant ("Build that wall" or "lock her up") or an idiotic 4 letter acronym (MAGA) in order for some to process it as a message.
Click to expand...

What’s the message:
“Communism isn’t that bad”
“There’s an infinite number of genders”
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4,244
#4,244
luthervol said:
You forgot nada.

Of course I understand how the system works. One candidate will win and the others will lose. You can vote for the candidate you wish to win, against the one you wish to lose, for a third party as a statement vote, or not vote at all.

The dems. have a message, but evidently they need to summarize it in a 3 word childlike chant ("Build that wall" or "lock her up") or an idiotic 4 letter acronym (MAGA) in order for some to process it as a message.
Click to expand...

What was Hillary's message?
 
#4,249
#4,249
luthervol said:
Progress is desired and not something to fear and despise; plus, it's inevitable. Her message may have been a tad to cerebral.
Click to expand...

too*

i-know-lets-have-a-spelling-contest.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4,250
#4,250
luthervol said:
Progress is desired and not something to fear and despise; plus, it's inevitable. Her message may have been a tad to cerebral.
Click to expand...

No, she was just a terrible, unlikable candidate who chose an execrable running mate. There is nothing cerebral about progressive politics.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top