Orange_Crush
Resident windbag genius
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2004
- Messages
- 43,175
- Likes
- 88,946
You said election law forbids receiving dirt from foreign sources.
The dossier was compiled as opposition research prior to the election.
Team Clinton and the DNC received this dirt prior to the election.
Fits your definition.
In addition, testimony shows Steele was shopping the information well before the election. Signs point to a Yahoo News story in September that was based on the Steele info.
If you say it's only a foul of election law if said dirt is used (which is not the law) show me where Team Trump USED any foreign generated dirt (let alone received any).
U.S. intel: Russia compromised seven states prior to 2016 election
U.S. intel: Russia compromised seven states prior to 2016 election - NBC News
Muellers Russia probe zeroes in: When did Trump decide to run? | Fox Business
FOX Business has learned that Muellers team has been focusing on this detail in interviews with people who have been called to provide testimony in the probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 election and whether Trump aides or associates violated federal laws by colluding in that effort to gain an edge over Hillary Clinton.
People with direct knowledge of these interviews said that Muellers investigators have made finding the details of the timing of Trumps decision a key question for people in his orbit who have been asked to speak with the special prosecutors office.
Mueller team asks about Trump's Russian business dealings as he weighed a run for president - CNNPolitics
Dotting the T's and crossing the I's before he announces Trump's vindication.
Of course you wouldn't notice the intentional act. He is crossing the T's and dotting the I's before he indicts Trump. Is that better? Your mind was just blown I bet.
Spot on article.
There is still no evidence tying Trump to Russian conspiracy | TheHill
...When Trump won, the Russians organized protests against him. Objectively, the most direct explanation is that the Russians wanted to be disruptive and were seeking any target of opportunity to do so.
That is why I am skeptical. It takes willful blindness not to acknowledge either the lack of direct evidence of collusion or the implausibility of many of the theories abounding on cable news programs. None of this means that people cannot speculate on the existence of entirely undisclosed evidence, but some skepticism with the speculation would be helpful.
I got you:
I am very skeptical of Trump's claims of lack of financial connections to Russia.
How's that?
That's not getting the attention you all like so you put it in every thread multiple times. The Russians will never hire you with that type of sloppiness.
That's not getting the attention you all like so you put it in every thread multiple times. The Russians will never hire you with that type of sloppiness.
Quit being a ***** and man up...
Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment