NorthDallas40
Displaced Hillbilly
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2014
- Messages
- 61,352
- Likes
- 89,537
Lol, as if MAGA cared about human rights as anything more than a pretense to launch airstrikes on a country.
Thanks. Pretty much explains it for those that want to understand it. I look forward to getting all the money we can out of Vietnam and Thailand.What is Section 122 of the US Trade Act of 1974, Trump’s latest tariff weapon for 10% extra duty on the world - The Economic Times
President Trump announced a 10% global tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, shifting from the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) after a Supreme Court ruling. This new measure, permitted for temporary import surcharges due to international payments problems, can...m.economictimes.com
Throwing gays off of roof tops is kind of a different level than keeping guys with peckers that are wearing dresses from sharing bathrooms with little girls or locker rooms with big girls.
It wouldn’t be carpet bombing a country. More like precision strikes in targets like the supreme leader’s pillow.
Can you give some numbers on these "right-wing" attacks on gay people?Lol, do we need to catalog right-wing attacks on gay people in the United States?
Or the hate preached by evangelicals towards gay people?
You guys have more in common with groups like the Mullahs and the Taliban than you care to admit.
Lol, do we need to catalog right-wing attacks on gay people in the United States?
Or the hate preached by evangelicals towards gay people?
You guys have more in common with groups like the Mullahs and the Taliban than you care to admit.
Oh I’m doing fine. And we don’t believe you on your stance on Trump you are clearly a devout discipleYou’re working much harder at disparaging Trump. I was pretty clear that I don’t oppose the economic and foreign policies. I’m open to reasonable counter arguments, but they typically come with the insults. Do better.
Hey again just recognizing your work. Multiple people have made posts commenting on you “not liking Trump” and then spend, what are we on five pages+, of you defending Trump.No surprise here that that’s what you believe.
“Devout disciple”?
Hey again just recognizing your work. Multiple people have made posts commenting on you “not liking Trump” and then spend, what are we on five pages+, of you defending Trump.
Walks like a duck quacks like a duck looks like a duck must be a duck.
Lol. Complains about insults while making insults. We know you like them we’ve got 5+ pages of you defending this stupidity. You braced for July when these tariffs go poof?The usual offenders are running up the page count because they don’t like that I’m agreeing with the economic and foreign policies. The dumbest ones include the most insults.
Lol. Complains about insults while making insults. We know you like them we’ve got 5+ pages of you defending this stupidity. You braced for July when these tariffs go poof?
Are you seriously trying to act like you haven’t added your own insults in the last 5 pages?Have I called you a leg humper, devout disciple, water carrier, welfare recipient, disingenuous, Trump worshipper, long winded? Saying that the cult members directing those comments at me today and saying that those spewing the most are the dumbest ones hits hard. To some of them anyway.
Are you seriously trying to act like you haven’t added your own insults in the last 5 pages?
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
And I take exception to that list I have not today used leg humper, disingenuous, welfare recipient, or long winded at you.
ETA: and while expressing your righteous indignation you drop cult members and dumbest ones
Have you read the section 122 code yet and are you ready for late July?
This is the most fun I’ve had in this thread in weeks. This rube is 0fer on his predictions (SCOTUS will uphold the rulings being the biggest one to consider today) and expects us to take his tripe seriously on what will happen going forward on these latest idiotic tariffs. All while completely ignoring the section 122 code that clearly says they expire after 150 days without an affirmative resolution from Congress supporting their extensionHush it you oddly emotional, dumb, moronic, stupid, emotionally distressed, TDS-afflicted librard sheep...
Are you seriously trying to act like you haven’t added your own insults in the last 5 pages?
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
And I take exception to that list I have not today used leg humper, disingenuous, welfare recipient, or long winded at you.
ETA: and while expressing your righteous indignation you drop cult members and dumbest ones
Have you read the section 122 code yet and are you ready for late July?
This is the most fun I’ve had in this thread in weeks. This rube is 0fer on his predictions (SCOTUS will uphold the rulings being the biggest one to consider today) and expects us to take his tripe seriously on what will happen going forward on these latest idiotic tariffs. All while completely ignoring the section 122 code that clearly says they expire after 150 days without an affirmative resolution from Congress supporting their extension![]()
Oh I’m not offended at all. I’m laughing at your hypocrisy on it all.So be offended. You’re in the group spewing the cited garbage. I inferred that the dumbest are insulting the most frequently from the group.
I’m pretty sure that my comments have been reciprocal in intent.
What would you like me to use when addressing the needless, tired name calling and what not of POTUS? TDS kind of fits well, no?
