Too much ice

#13,326
#13,326
LouderVol said:
you went from it being a political issue (GOP), to now a moral issue. those are two different arguments.

anyone looking to cause a fight is not a good thing. period.
Click to expand...

Do you not understand that the problem here in the original post that you responded to is that the AZ GOP couldn't see that a cop looking to cause a fight was a bad thing? You're saying it's an obvious issue. I agree. The AZ GOP does not. Are we on the same page now?

Louder, I love you bro, but you're killing me on this. A small, responsible, smart, and fair government does not staff itself with people that think it's OK to try to entrap the kids in their community. Just take the L, bro. You should have never jumped on this.


1775831401951.png
 
#13,327
#13,327
n_huffhines said:
I'm not talking about the law at all. I am talking about right and wrong.

Forget about what the laws may actually be. The very fact that we have laws about entrapment is because we all agree entrapment (of otherwise innocent people) is bad, right? Ipso facto, entrapment of teens in the form of a dangerous situation involving deliberate provocation against those exercising free speech is especially wrong, right?
Click to expand...
Entrapment? Like on January 6 when police welcomed protesters into the capitol before arresting (and shooting) them? THAT kind of entrapment?

Glad to see you finally coming around to our side. Welcome!!!!
 
#13,328
#13,328
LouderVol said:
this has fallen off.

first it was 100% cut off. then it was practically 100%, with only a few edge cases making it. then it was a hard 99%, now we are at 95%.

these numbers are getting revised just like Biden's job numbers.

I wonder what they will be the next time.
Click to expand...
Yeah. He will be a complete failure of it drops to... I'll let you fill in the blanks
 
#13,329
#13,329
Rickyvol77 said:
I am referring to blocking traffic during protests not just jaywalking as itself....and it's still a law, most normal jurisdictions will charge them with some form of kidnapping for intentionally blocking traffic...which they should

I am not surprised you think it's not a big deal
Click to expand...
The horror. I hope therapists were on standby.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11 and MercyPercy
#13,330
#13,330
OrangeTsar said:
Entrapment? Like on January 6 when police welcomed protesters into the capitol before arresting (and shooting) them? THAT kind of entrapment?

Glad to see you finally coming around to our side. Welcome!!!!
Click to expand...

This is an incredible example of changing their position as it suits them. You all talk about FAFO and "fight with the cops you get what you deserve" and here you are defending them in the same breath. At least be consistent so you don't look like a total dumbass.
 
#13,333
#13,333
EasternVol said:
Wrong on all counts. Does it hurt to be that hateful and ignorant?
Click to expand...
Last time he tried to do the "pro-terrorist/Hamas" thing, it was to LMAO about how the people blowing up a girls' elementary school couldn't have been us. Whoops

Rickyvol77 said:
LMAO it was a failed missile launch by the IRGC that landed on that school...and the hamas brigade lapped up the story as predicted
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
#13,339
#13,339
Last edited:
#13,340
#13,340
“Protestors began throwing rocks, bottles and concrete at officers”
Of course a mentally ill lib skips that part and portrays this as some poor guy peacefully protesting and hit for no reason.
When a riot breaks out, stay away. Or don’t and see what happens
“Hey there’s a riot and I think I’m gonna go take pics.” Brilliant choice.
 
#13,342
#13,342
OrangeTsar said:
Yeah, i mean it’s not like there is video evidence of the police doing just what I described or anything 🙄
Click to expand...

I don't think timing or context are something that people like you take into account.

It really is just sad how easily you're fed a narrative when there is an overwhelming mountain of evidence that shows what happened that day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#13,344
#13,344
EasternVol said:
Still wrong on all counts. At least you're consistent.
Click to expand...
According to mainstream Islamic tradition and scholarly consensus, Prophet Muhammad was illiterate, meaning he could not read or write. The Quran refers to him as al-nabī al-ummī (the unlettered prophet), which is interpreted as evidence that he did not read or write previous scriptures, supporting the divine origin of the Quran.
 
#13,345
#13,345
Rickyvol77 said:
According to mainstream Islamic tradition and scholarly consensus, Prophet Muhammad was illiterate, meaning he could not read or write. The Quran refers to him as al-nabī al-ummī (the unlettered prophet), which is interpreted as evidence that he did not read or write previous scriptures, supporting the divine origin of the Quran.
Click to expand...
I assume he couldn’t count also. 6 years old is kinda young for a bride.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman and Rickyvol77
#13,346
#13,346
DinkinFlicka said:
I don't think timing or context are something that people like you take into account.

It really is just sad how easily you're fed a narrative when there is an overwhelming mountain of evidence that shows what happened that day.
Click to expand...
“Context”. The go to life line liberals use when you prove they are mistaken or disingenuous.

Most commonly used dodge at snopes is “lacks context”. Not True. Not false. But actually true but in way they don’t like.

“I didn’t punch that guy”

“here’s video of you punching that guy”

“Ok, I punched him; but here is the context “

🙄
 
#13,347
#13,347
tim said:
I assume he couldn’t count also. 6 years old is kinda young for a bride.
Click to expand...
His claim is that Muhammed never raped anyone of any age, never enslaved or murdered anyone, wasn't illiterate, and never did anything wrong, and that all historians, Muslims, the Quran, and Muhammed himself are lying
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top