Too much ice

[Rickyvol77]

Ok then concentrate the deportation efforts on the 31 and on implementing policy that negatively affects all of them in the US. Eventually those communities will fail or they will change. Not everything has to be a right. Trump used to believe that (or at least claimed he did)

Great, except it's the federal government's job to enforce immigration laws, and these illegals are also being involved in several federal issues (census, benefits, welfare, tax evasion, crime, fraud, trafficking, drugs, gangs, etc)

 

[utvolpj]

Great, except it's the federal government's job to enforce immigration laws, and these illegals are also being involved in several federal issues (census, benefits, welfare, tax evasion, crime, fraud, trafficking, drugs, gangs, etc)

Stop trying to eat the whole elephant. What is currently being done is not working. Why not try a different approach instead of looking like this

 

[LouderVol]

You are right and wrong here.

I agree that Obama did it "quieter" and didn't go after the gardener, but also Trump can't "quietly work with the states" because 19 blue states, the Dems in general and the MSM have done a 180 about illegal immigration and ICE and work to block most any enforcement or deportations, even with violent felons

pull the federal funding for those 19. but otherwise don't engage them. put out a simple statement "because State X is not working with federal agents according to our laws, we will no longer be providing federal funds to State X."

let the state flounder and react, while you ignore them. verbally/online engaging these states was one of the worst ideas Trump has had, which is saying something.

 

[Rickyvol77]

Stop trying to eat the whole elephant. What is currently being done is not working. Why not try a different approach instead of looking like this

View attachment 820794

Agree except the point is to actually solve the problem, not to allow the problem to fester because it benefits a political party

Both sides were on the same exact side and totally agreed with enforcing illegal immigration, then one side did a 180 for political purposes about 8 years ago.

The immigration laws/enforcement didn't just pop up out of no where in 2024

 

[Rickyvol77]

pull the federal funding for those 19. but otherwise don't engage them. put out a simple statement "because State X is not working with federal agents according to our laws, we will no longer be providing federal funds to State X."

let the state flounder and react, while you ignore them. verbally/online engaging these states was one of the worst ideas Trump has had, which is saying something.

Not a real solution because lower level federal judges who are political can apparently overturn this in some situations

 

[CobbVol]

pull the federal funding for those 19. but otherwise don't engage them. put out a simple statement "because State X is not working with federal agents according to our laws, we will no longer be providing federal funds to State X."

let the state flounder and react, while you ignore them. verbally/online engaging these states was one of the worst ideas Trump has had, which is saying something.

District judges in Sacramento, SF, etc. would be lining up in glee for someone to file a case against that action in their court room.

 

[LouderVol]

Not a real solution because lower level federal judges who are political can apparently overturn this in some situations

yeah Trump gets overturned because he doesn't do anything officially. I said it from the beginning, Trump's Michael Scott declaration of bankruptcy doesn't work. likely because he doesn't actually want the changes made, and wants it struck down so he can play the victim to his sycophants. "Ah shucks I tried but the bad judges stopped me from something I theoretically could do but didn't even attempt the right way"

 

[Rickyvol77]

yeah Trump gets overturned because he doesn't do anything officially. I said it from the beginning, Trump's Michael Scott declaration of bankruptcy doesn't work. likely because he doesn't actually want the changes made, and wants it struck down so he can play the victim to his sycophants. "Ah shucks I tried but the bad judges stopped me from something I theoretically could do but didn't even attempt the right way"

Actually there are several cases that have been overturned incorrectly by law at the federal judge level....including judges saying that the President can't overturn executive orders of previous Presidents, which has been overturned at the Supreme Court multiple times already...Trump is correct legally on most of these cases.

 

[WoodsmanVol]

Thaw ICE, You can see why the USA is no longer a favored tourist destination.

 

[n_huffhines]

As a resident of Oklahoma, i'd personally like to thank DJT for picking Mullin. Maybe we now can get a Senator that can carry on a cognizant interview.

334K views · 15K reactions | The Markwayne Mullin hearings are about to be hilarious. By the way, rest of the story to the anecdote here: I made the baseball team but the head coach never did warm to me. My junior year he made me pick between bas

The Markwayne Mullin hearings are about to be hilarious. By the way, rest of the story to the anecdote here: I made the baseball team but the head coach never did warm to me. My junior year he...

www.facebook.com

 

[EasternVol]

FWIW; over 3 million people were deported by ICE under Obama and no one complained much.
The only difference of course then was that “sanctuary cities” weren’t a thing the. And local la enforcement actually cooperated with ICE making things much less confrontational.
So is this a question as to “the letter of the law”? The letter and SPIRIT of the law are identical in this case. You have to have permission to be here.

Just the same way i couldn’t barge into your home and kitchen without you inviting me.

Either a country has borders or it does not, in which case it ceases to be a country at all.

We've been through that before, no? There's a huge difference between then and now in that then the Administration wasn’t arbitrarily pulling student visas over political statements or removing refugee status and Feds weren't running around acting like a bunch of carjackers or brownshirts and systematically denying due process. It was a legitimate law enforcement operation and not bad political theater. There was no sweetheart deal with a tinpot dictator to put deportees in a supermax and as far as I know we didn't try to spite detainees by holding them a thousand miles from their friends and families or deportees by sending them 5,000 from miles from their home countries. Let me know if I missed anything.

 

[EasternVol]

pull the federal funding for those 19. but otherwise don't engage them. put out a simple statement "because State X is not working with federal agents according to our laws, we will no longer be providing federal funds to State X."

let the state flounder and react, while you ignore them. verbally/online engaging these states was one of the worst ideas Trump has had, which is saying something.

That would increase Federal control over the states though. Way back when revenue sharing was debated and agreed, was any such withholding part of the arrangement?