Too much ice

Oh bull ****. I say ICE murdered, or usually I say executed, because that’s what they did. And as much as this must hurt for you the local Democrats are 100% right in claiming ICE murdered (executed) those people. They’re still bat **** crazy but a broken clock is right twice a day.

I’ll never be a Democrat. Never have been. Right now it looks like I’ll never be a Republican again either. I’ll absolutely vote however if they trot out Vance I’ll likely be voting Libertarian. Again. Just like I have two out of the last three.

Oh and bad news for y’all. Trump isn’t really a Republican. He’s a rebranded Democrat and he’s got y’all lathered up over socialist fiscal policies and you’re all gobbling it up and parroting it out.

Voting is personal. You'll make the right decision for you and your family.
 
Democrat refusal to fund DHS now leading to ever increasing TSA lines at airports. The dems have refused to pay TSA three times now in the past few months.
And it is doubly stupid because ICE is ALREADY funded.
Lol, they have offered to fund TSA several times but Republicans don't want to reform ICE after it has killed several people
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sin City Vol
Yes and for others, you try to make the decision for the greater good

The reason you vote for someone may be different than the next person. Greater good is down the priority list of the first I mentioned. If we are listing 20 reasons I could keep naming items but at the top is a persons personal situation that gets layered out. It's the 5 Why's concept applied to voting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman
Democrat refusal to fund DHS now leading to ever increasing TSA lines at airports. The dems have refused to pay TSA three times now in the past few months.
And it is doubly stupid because ICE is ALREADY funded.

There is no more democrat party, only a red and green alliance - Independent, Glenn Beck
 
Lol, they have offered to fund TSA several times but Republicans don't want to reform ICE after it has killed several people
The democrats don’t have the votes to demand reforms to ICE. They are in the MINORITY. All they can do is gum up the works. You know, that whole „democracy“ thing you leftists always talk about.
Elections have consequences as lightbringer Obama once said. The majority says no to reforming ICE. So live with it. And pay the brave men and women who keep us safe at airports.
 
The reason you vote for someone may be different than the next person. Greater good is down the priority list of the first I mentioned. If we are listing 20 reasons I could keep naming items but at the top is a persons personal situation that gets layered out. It's the 5 Why's concept applied to voting.
I suppose I should have said "in addition to", with one being 1A and the other 1B. That's my personal reasoning anyway
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT
The democrats don’t have the votes to demand reforms to ICE. They are in the MINORITY. All they can do is gum up the works. You know, that whole „democracy“ thing you leftists always talk about.
Elections have consequences as lightbringer Obama once said. The majority says no to reforming ICE. So live with it. And pay the brave men and women who keep us safe at airports.
The majority of voters don't say no to reforming ICE at all. If you're going to fall back on "this is how the system works" then stop whining about how the system is working
 
The majority of voters don't say no to reforming ICE at all. If you're going to fall back on "this is how the system works" then stop whining about how the system is working

Reforming ICE is a pointless waste of time. Bringing it up is just another dog whistle for the partisan mouth breathers. Everyone should be lobbying for true, comprehensive immigration reform. If that happens ICE will reform by default.
 
The majority of voters don't say no to reforming ICE at all. If you're going to fall back on "this is how the system works" then stop whining about how the system is working
Actually, until the next election, the „majority of the voters“ have said whatever the majority in Congress says. That‘s how our system works.
Even if polling today says 60% of the public is against something, it doesn’t change the official fact that we govern based on elections ONLY. We don’t have a direct democracy where the entire populace votes every single time an issue comes up.
The ancient Athenians tried that and it crashed and burned big time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
You forgot the third leg of the „Democrat“ replacement alliance; Islamic radicals

The transcript below is from a local radio host, Michael Delgiorno. It's automatically generated so there there some minor accuracy issues.

I've attached the link to the iheart radio show.


-----------------

If you've studied the Quran, if you've studied

(19:24):
the Hidith, if you have studied the life of Mohammad
and the three contradictory lives of Mohammad, and you understand
Sharia law, and someone is an Islamist, there is nothing
more anathetical to an Islamist form of government and system

(19:45):
of life than our constitution, than our form of government,
than our culture and way of life, which is why
they're trying to either the long game, populate, infiltrate, agitate,

(20:08):
and then ultimately wage war.

Speaker 3 (20:13):
They're not going to change.

Speaker 2 (20:14):
I cannot tell you if they're going to win, but
they're not going to change, and they're gonna stop trying
now as your hottest will kill a bunch of people
today to strike fear a political Islamist place for the
next generation. And if you wake up any morning and
think what's happening in England can't happen here, you need
to rewake up and in a hurry.
 
The transcript below is from a local radio host, Michael Delgiorno. It's automatically generated so there there some minor accuracy issues.

I've attached the link to the iheart radio show.


-----------------

If you've studied the Quran, if you've studied

(19:24):
the Hidith, if you have studied the life of Mohammad
and the three contradictory lives of Mohammad, and you understand
Sharia law, and someone is an Islamist, there is nothing
more anathetical to an Islamist form of government and system

(19:45):
of life than our constitution, than our form of government,
than our culture and way of life, which is why
they're trying to either the long game, populate, infiltrate, agitate,

(20:08):
and then ultimately wage war.

Speaker 3 (20:13):
They're not going to change.

Speaker 2 (20:14):
I cannot tell you if they're going to win, but
they're not going to change, and they're gonna stop trying
now as your hottest will kill a bunch of people
today to strike fear a political Islamist place for the
next generation. And if you wake up any morning and
think what's happening in England can't happen here, you need
to rewake up and in a hurry.
Regarding „studying the Quaran“……I generally do not read many fictional books 😉
 
Only The Best People™

Trump installed Jesus Christ as the leader of the Office Of Immigration Detention Ombudsman’s Office?????
Does anyone on the left even have any basic understanding of basic grammar and sentence composition?
Or maybe they should use the name of My Lord as an off color interjection?

Interesting how no one on the left ever uses the name of the Islamic prophet in vain.
 
Actually, until the next election, the „majority of the voters“ have said whatever the majority in Congress says. That‘s how our system works.
Even if polling today says 60% of the public is against something, it doesn’t change the official fact that we govern based on elections ONLY. We don’t have a direct democracy where the entire populace votes every single time an issue comes up.
The ancient Athenians tried that and it crashed and burned big time.
We don't have a direct democracy, which is why something deeply unpopular should be rammed through - "the system" - but then when that isn't successful because of the same system, you b!tch and moan to high heaven. Make up your mind
 

Advertisement



Back
Top