Too much ice

#9,779
#9,779
hog88 said:
You have been spending a lot of time with the Mrs since retirement, she's rubbing off on you..
Click to expand...
It’s a self protection move generally. But in this case I’m pretty sure I’m more pissed off at the ridiculous extrajudicial killing of a citizen than she is. She just hates Trump. I hate the ridiculous actions of his underlings resulting in the needless deaths of people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Delmar and hog88
#9,781
#9,781
Orange_Crush said:
Just for clarity, is he wrong?
Click to expand...
No. It is interpretation. And situational gray area.

For example, if my Podiatrist (who has a scope of practice limited to my feet) notices me chocking on hard candy during my exam, is he allowed to perform moves like mouth sweep to dislodge the obstruction...like any untrained citizen faced with same situation. The scope of practice says 'no'. But I would side with the idea that even though it isn't in the Podiatrist's legal scope of practice, he did the right thing.
 
#9,783
#9,783
McDad said:
No. It is interpretation. And situational gray area.

For example, if my Podiatrist (who has a scope of practice limited to my feet) notices me chocking on hard candy during my exam, is he allowed to perform moves like mouth sweep to dislodge the obstruction...like any untrained citizen faced with same situation. The scope of practice says 'no'. But I would side with the idea that even though it isn't in the Podiatrist's legal scope of practice, he did the right thing.
Click to expand...
It was a joke.

It was a joke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
#9,784
#9,784
McDad said:
It authorizes what their scope is. It also delineates what their scope isn't. But I didn't see anything limiting their scope when a serious crime is witnessed. Our discussion was about car theft. But I think it is more clear when we talk about crimes bringing harm to people rather than property crimes.
Click to expand...
Ok we don’t disagree on that I in fact was the one that provided that expansion. In this case the serious crime was committed by the damn agents 🤷‍♂️
 
#9,794
#9,794
McDad said:
Is this the incident where they shot that male nurse?
Click to expand...
Well that’s what the last 150 pages of this thread are about which is what I assumed you and the thick headed ham sammich were referring to. If you were talking about limited authority with exemptions for dangerous extenuating circumstance we’ve already agreed that’s likely the case even though I can’t see where that info was actually provided. In fact I’ll go as far as to say if any armed LEO doesn’t intercede to protect a person in danger I’d ask what the hell was wrong with them which is what I think got you to thinking?
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
#9,798
#9,798
NorthDallas40 said:
Well that’s what the last 150 pages of this thread are about which is what I assumed you had the thick headed ham sammich were referring to. If you were talking about limited authority with exemptions for dangerous extenuating circumstance we’ve already agreed that’s likely the case even though I can’t see where that info was actually provided. In fact I’ll go as far as to say if any armed LEO doesn’t intercede to protect a person in danger I’d ask what the hell was wrong with them which is what I think got you to thinking?
Click to expand...
Yeah...I've been out of the loop on the event. From the limited stuff I saw, that looks like criminal behavior by ICE. I didn't see long form videos of the moment so no idea what lead up to the murder (my position).
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top