Too much ice

#8,377
#8,377
rjd970 said:
www.theguardian.com

Anti-Trump US reporter says she was offered job at ICE after ‘minimal vetting’

Slate journalist Laura Jedeed documented hiring process and said she got offer despite not completing paperwork
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com

Anti-ICE journalist offered position with ICE. She didn’t complete required background paperwork on criminal history and passed a drug test after smoking marijuana 6 days prior. Still received job offer and was onboarded in the system.

Who are these people actually doing the enforcing of immigration laws? At best the fact that she made it as far as she did in the application process is concerning.
Click to expand...

I'm sure Minnesotans right now feel like "They aren't sending their best"

Take off the masks and start identifying yourself, whether you have a warrant or not, what you are detaining someone for. Learn the law. Should be a bare minimum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11 and DuckInAPen
#8,382
#8,382
OHvol40 said:
That’s because they don’t care about any conservative or Christian ideals. They are using conservatives as a vehicle to push their own self-serving agenda. They will toss those ideals aside if they are a roadblock to their real agenda.
Click to expand...
Spoken like someone who doesn’t have it figured out. Nice ramble though.
 
#8,385
#8,385
rjd970 said:
The about face on the second amendment from the administration apologists is one of the more pathetic parts of this whole thing.
Click to expand...
Been dropping these all weekend on people. I took a life long friend to task in private convo as he is a staunch 2A supporter. And he normally is … but not this time. And I told him I believe him on his convictions and told him I expect more. We agreed to disagree because it’s ludicrous to actually destroy lifelong relationships because if disagreement. But taking each other to task is absolutely the expectation. If the tables were turned I’d expect the same from him toward me.

1769454638847.jpeg


1769454655178.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11 and Smokey123
#8,387
#8,387
Remember guys, don’t call the 5ft2in guy wearing the gestapo cosplay the gestapo or there will be consequences. Im really wondering if this administration had the constitution printed on the toilet paper in the White House the way they wipe their ass with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11 and BernardKingGOAT
#8,390
#8,390
Majors said:
Where in the 2A does it say you can impede/interfere as long as you’re carrying a gun?
Click to expand...
Can you point me to the part that says “ well … you have to have your permit of course”. I’d guess it’s somewhere close to “shall not be infringed “ which I have seen here all the time. It must be close the amendment isn’t that large. TIA!
 
#8,393
#8,393
MercyPercy said:
Patel: "You cannot bring a firearm, loaded, with multiple magazines to any sort of protest that you want. It's that simple. You don't have a right to break the law."

Whistling past the graveyard.
Click to expand...
First part, I would generally disagree with but that his opinion, the second part is true as a generalization.

I still don't see what this has to do with the 2nd amendment.
 
#8,398
#8,398

In 2024 Minnesota AG Keith Ellison Argued No Right to Carry a Gun at ‘Political Rallies and Protests’​


1769454879305.png
In 2024, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison (D) was among 17 AGs who contended there is no right to carry a gun at “political rallies and protests.”

The AGs did this in a January 26, 2024, filing in support of upholding California’s gun controls for “sensitive places” in a Ninth Circuit case.

In the filing, Ellison and the other AGs expressed support for banning the possession of firearms “in crowded places.”

The AGs wrote: “Without the power to institute such restrictions, California and other states would be left unable effectively to prevent gun violence in crowded places, around vulnerable populations, or where individuals are exercising other constitutionally protected rights, putting the public at risk.”

They emphasized, “Even the perceived risk of gun violence could cause repercussions, as individuals may be discouraged from visiting crowded or confined locations where they know others may be armed.”

To bolster their argument, Ellison and the other AGs noted the practice of designating “event involving political speech, like political rallies and protests,” as gun-free sensitive places.

www.breitbart.com

In 2024 Minnesota AG Keith Ellison Argued No Right to Carry a Gun at 'Political Rallies and Protests'

In 2024, Minnesota AG Keith Ellison (D) was among 17 AGs who contended there is no right to carry a gun at "political rallies and protests."
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com
 
#8,399
#8,399
MercyPercy said:
Patel: "You cannot bring a firearm, loaded, with multiple magazines to any sort of protest that you want. It's that simple. You don't have a right to break the law."

True or false.
Click to expand...
Still waiting for you to provide where you can interfere as long as you’re carrying. Believe the kids called us trying to move the goal post some even called deflection.
 
#8,400
#8,400
MercyPercy said:
I'm sure Minnesotans right now feel like "They aren't sending their best"

Take off the masks and start identifying yourself, whether you have a warrant or not, what you are detaining someone for. Learn the law. Should be a bare minimum.
Click to expand...

Take off the masks? When the left identifies agents and has protestors bombarding their homes, their families with threats and use of violence, is that acceptable?

These nuts on the left are capable of quite a lot, as evidenced by their tracking chats.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top