Too much ice

Fwiw. Put me down in the "I told you this would get worse" category. Upholding the law has quickly come "what can we get away with because we have a badge".

I said it before and will say it again the more ICE/government cracks down, the worse this will get. There will be more and more incidents that get sketchier and sketchier until it really crosses a line and turns the mass public opinion against the government.

Pull ICE out but bring in the FBI to handle the mob. ICE is tained right now and it won't get better on its own.

If anything, the next one may be from the local ANTIFA chapter, ambushing and shooting agents.
 
I understand your point, but if “shutting off funds” was the answer, why have the other attempts to do so failed?

(It may be a simple as lack of will, or pure posturing, but other efforts to “defund” haven’t worked. See, for example, the efforts to defund child care subsidies to illegal immigrants just last week.)
They have failed because Trump thinks he can Michael Scott "declaring" something. Most of his rejections are because he tries to circumvent the process just to make the bs claim he tried to do something.
 
Wait, you need more? Conspiracy? You need a motive for these incredible lies?

Acknkwledge that they lied first and that you have a big problem with it, and we can discuss why they might've done it. If you don't have a ****ing gigantic problem with the lie, why should amybody talk to you?

I am not the one saying they lied because they wanted to invade their streets. Why do they want to invade the streets of Minneapolis?
 
Obama didnt actually deport more. He called catch and release at the border deport.

And the government being jack boots is a far bigger problem than the people protesting them. You can't use the circular argument of the side you don't like did something you don't like so your side gets to do something you do like, because that is the exact same argument they will use to do more themselves.

Especially in this last shooting. They shot a guy after they had him down on the ground, so this wasn't a protester escalating it was the government.
Again, it sounds like you are advocating for appeasement. Was the government being jackboots on January 6th?
 
Well, no right was violated and you have yet to prove one was violated. So, back to my question, how do you stop the obstruction of ICE officers in Minneapolis?
Look we understand in Mother Russia rights are granted by Putin. Here in your guest country we have a constitution with a bill of rights. What I pointed to is covered in the first two amendments. You should go read it before you post anymore.
 
No, he didn't and even if he had is the officer supposed to assume he only had one?

I think we cracked the code on volgr and his obsession with Russia. Guy just gets a chub for state propaganda. This is a dream for him, getting to parrot government lies when the video evidence is clear as day. The more removed from reality it is, the sweeter the juice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeardedVol
No, he didn't and even if he had is the officer supposed to assume he only had one?
IMG_4338.jpeg
Here’s the shooter pulling his gun. The only reason he pulls is he see the agent to his left taking the gun from the victims holster. So he clearly saw who had the gun and that there was no threat when he decided to shoot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
Yes, they need to dial it back. Just turn the checkbook off until they start cooperating with immigration officials.
This, and have someone other than Trump write up the narrative. Something along the idea of selling

"OK, fine. Immigration is under Federal purview and basically the rest of the country understands this and complies with how that is supposed to work. We formally withdraw any and all Federal funding regarding the state of Minnesota until such time lawful interaction with regards to immigration enforcement is restored. We would ask the good and sane residents of the great state of Minnesota to avoid such hardship by forcing those in power set aside the open violent and vitriolic propaganda quickly and have encourage peaceful interaction with lawful immigration enforcement like that seen elsewhere in our nation."

Whatever the actual wording make sure the message is it's the state/local heads in Minnesota that are fomenting all of this, it's a clear outlier for them to do so and that whatever hardship comes about from having their federal funding cut off is squarely on them.

Oh, and it matters not if anyone here disagrees with any of the particulars I agree with Hogg and others it's the best way to end ICE confrontations and still not just capitulate regarding immigration enforcement.
 
Wait, you need more? Conspiracy? You need a motive for these incredible lies?

Acknkwledge that they lied first and that you have a big problem with it, and we can discuss why they might've done it. If you don't have a ****ing gigantic problem with the lie, why should amybody talk to you?
Bless your heart, you are so deluded.
 
I mean its the Constitution. Innocent until PROVEN guilty. Felony is a government label not the act of the crime itself.

OJ is a murderer, but not a felon. He actually did the crime=murder and thus is a murderer. "Felon" can only be determined by a court.
Yea. I get that.
My angle was that some crimes are considered felonies.
Murder is a felony. So if you commit a murder you are both a murderer and a felon.
But maybe technically you do not call a person who commits felonies a felon.

I guess the bottom line is that there are lots of people have committed felonies who are not felons.

But there are not people who have committed murder who are not also murderers.
 
Get your head out of the sand. Minneapolis had a militia type scheme to impede ICE operations. They are putting citizens in the way on purpose. The signal chat getting hacked proved it. Minnesota politicians telling people to put their body on the line.
Ah I see you fell hook line and sinker for the Foxnews rage bait headline. Your story doesn't change the fact that federal agents are killing and illegally detaining American citizens.
 
This, and have someone other than Trump write up the narrative. Something along the idea of selling

"OK, fine. Immigration is under Federal purview and basically the rest of the country understands this and complies with how that is supposed to work. We formally withdraw any and all Federal funding regarding the state of Minnesota until such time lawful interaction with regards to immigration enforcement is restored. We would ask the good and sane residents of the great state of Minnesota to avoid such hardship by forcing those in power set aside the open violent and vitriolic propaganda quickly and have encourage peaceful interaction with lawful immigration enforcement like that seen elsewhere in our nation."

Whatever the actual wording make sure the message is it's the state/local heads in Minnesota that are fomenting all of this, it's a clear outlier for them to do so and that whatever hardship comes about from having their federal funding cut off is squarely on them.

Oh, and it matters not if anyone here disagrees with any of the particulars I agree with Hogg and others it's the best way to end ICE confrontations and still not just capitulate regarding immigration enforcement.

TN refuses to pass an open container law and the Feds withhold millions in highway funds because of it so I don't see why the same approach can't be taken with Sanctuary Cities/States.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top